Bodybuilding Chad branded as trash for having standards on Tinder

[email protected]

Pelican
Gold Member
kosko said:
Having preference is fine but totally canceling out a whole segment of girls, especially on traits she has no control over is quite dumb.

Yes but why is it socially acceptable for women to say they only want men over 6 feet? That's a trait that we can't control. YET, this is a totally accepted fact for women to state this. Do they get their Tinder profiles banned for it?

The omega males and feminists running these companies have made this double standard ok. Women can list every little uncontrollable traits she wants in a man and no one bats an eye. But stop the fucking presses when a man does it. The butthurt women complain to these sub-humans in control and BAM! Instant ban for the misogynist man. Then they share the story with the MSM and shame him for having standards that no one gives a fuck about when it's flipped to the other gender.

I'm under 6 foot, but do I complain and whine when I see a woman state she prefers men over that height? No. I accept it and move on. Are these precious females not required to do the same? Currently no, because we have simp men STILL giving in to their every wants and desires. Women will continue to be spoiled little bitch princess because WEAK MEN allow it to happen.

So this guy doesn't want a woman who has been with a black guy. Who gives a fuck. She needs to wipe her tears away and swipe to the next guy. Life isn't fair. Cry me a river, bitch.
 

Mr. D

Pelican
Gold Member
porscheguy said:
He had 3 simple rules.
1. She could have one bastard offspring at the most. He said he wanted his own kids.
2. If she dated black guys, don’t even contact him.
3. He didn’t want money grubbing bitches.

Needless to say, this didn’t go over well because in 2019, how dare a man have standards.

On the first rule. I can see that a lot of women would be pissed off about it. But it also highlights just how much women view men as replaceable. And though they might want their eggs paired with Chad DNA, they really give zero fucks about who raises the kid as long as he gives his resources to her.

On the second. Men are allowed to discriminate however they wish when it comes to where they put their dicks, just as women are allowed to discriminate how they wish when it comes to dicks they’ll sit on. It could also be that the more a woman embraces diversity, the more sjw she is. And who wants to deal with that?

On the third point, he doesn’t want a dead beat who sits on her ass. What’s the big deal?

https://www.mirror.co.uk/lifestyle/dating/man-branded-trash-tinder-profile-14263855

I don't see anything wrong with this, beyond him revealing his standards.

As far as the second rule...
Personally, I don't really care whether or not a woman has dated a black man.

Unless the guy's FOB from Africa, which then might make it an issue.

I say "might", because most women in Finland who go for those guys are (to loosely quote king bast) trashy, SJW's, feminists or just plain naïve.
 

game_ethic

Kingfisher
Thot Leader said:
What about discriminating based on their bone structure or IQ? Or on established (and statistically valid) undesirable traits that are linked to their group? You aren't allowed as an individual to say "I'm just not interested in any of you"?

You’re allowed to say whatever you want, just as I’m allowed to think and say you’re a racist. Shouldn’t be a problem right?

The fact that guys like you can make statements like this with zero consequences (and with a cheerleading squad to boot), shows the direction this forum is headed in.
 

Goldin Boy

Pelican
game_ethic said:
Thot Leader said:
What about discriminating based on their bone structure or IQ? Or on established (and statistically valid) undesirable traits that are linked to their group? You aren't allowed as an individual to say "I'm just not interested in any of you"?

You’re allowed to say whatever you want, just as I’m allowed to think and say you’re a racist. Shouldn’t be a problem right?

The fact that guys like you can make statements like this with zero consequences (and with a cheerleading squad to boot), shows the direction this forum is headed in.

What he said wasn't against the forum rules. What kind of "consequences" do you want?

Just because you don't like someone's opinion doesn't mean they can't voice it. This isn't Jezebel or the comment section of any of those leftist/SJW rags. If you don't what he said, just read it and move on.
 

game_ethic

Kingfisher
Goldin Boy said:
game_ethic said:
Thot Leader said:
What about discriminating based on their bone structure or IQ? Or on established (and statistically valid) undesirable traits that are linked to their group? You aren't allowed as an individual to say "I'm just not interested in any of you"?

You’re allowed to say whatever you want, just as I’m allowed to think and say you’re a racist. Shouldn’t be a problem right?

The fact that guys like you can make statements like this with zero consequences (and with a cheerleading squad to boot), shows the direction this forum is headed in.

What he said wasn't against the forum rules. What kind of "consequences" do you want?

Just because you don't like someone's opinion doesn't mean they can't voice it. This isn't Jezebel or the comment section of any of those leftist/SJW rags. If you don't what he said, just read it and move on.
I remember a time when guys were (rightfully) shamed and/or given warnings for holding beliefs such as this on here. Exhibit A https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-57889.html. The only difference between back then and today’s forum is that there were less closet racists such as Thot Leader and when they did rear their heads, people called them out and sometimes they even got banned as in the case of Requiem. It’s not stretch to say guys with these beliefs are tolerated today.
 

VNvet

Kingfisher
I'm under 6 foot, but do I complain and whine when I see a woman state she prefers men over that height? No. I accept it and move on. Are these precious females not required to do the same? Currently no, because we have simp men STILL giving in to their every wants and desires. Women will continue to be spoiled little bitch princess because WEAK MEN allow it to happen.

As a man under 6 feet AND bald, I'll let you in on a little secret...

Just lie.

Go to the date and never mention it. It's mostly about how you make her FEEL instead of how you LOOK.

Looks get you the match. Feels get you the bang.
 

[email protected]

Pelican
Gold Member
VNvet said:
I'm under 6 foot, but do I complain and whine when I see a woman state she prefers men over that height? No. I accept it and move on. Are these precious females not required to do the same? Currently no, because we have simp men STILL giving in to their every wants and desires. Women will continue to be spoiled little bitch princess because WEAK MEN allow it to happen.

As a man under 6 feet AND bald, I'll let you in on a little secret...

Just lie.

Go to the date and never mention it. It's mostly about how you make her FEEL instead of how you LOOK.

Looks get you the match. Feels get you the bang.

Oh I know. And I agree. I don't listen to what a woman says in any medium.

It's the principle of it that is wrong.
 

kosko

Peacock
Gold Member
kosko said:
Having preference is fine but totally canceling out a whole segment of girls, especially on traits she has no control over is quite dumb.

Yes but why is it socially acceptable for women to say they only want men over 6 feet? That's a trait that we can't control. YET, this is a totally accepted fact for women to state this. Do they get their Tinder profiles banned for it?

The omega males and feminists running these companies have made this double standard ok. Women can list every little uncontrollable traits she wants in a man and no one bats an eye. But stop the fucking presses when a man does it. The butthurt women complain to these sub-humans in control and BAM! Instant ban for the misogynist man. Then they share the story with the MSM and shame him for having standards that no one gives a fuck about when it's flipped to the other gender.

I'm under 6 foot, but do I complain and whine when I see a woman state she prefers men over that height? No. I accept it and move on. Are these precious females not required to do the same? Currently no, because we have simp men STILL giving in to their every wants and desires. Women will continue to be spoiled little bitch princess because WEAK MEN allow it to happen.

So this guy doesn't want a woman who has been with a black guy. Who gives a fuck. She needs to wipe her tears away and swipe to the next guy. Life isn't fair. Cry me a river, bitch.

I don't care what women do.

Adopting thier similar dating "screens" to the male side isn't ideal in my view. I don't have a preference for taller girls, I usually don't check for them. But, of course, this isn't in stone. I'm dealing with a girl right now who is a leggy giant in heels versus modest height kosko.

Is the above to say is go and be open to date any woman no matter how much of a degenerate she is? No, of course not. Use your own discretion and your preferences will lead you to what you find desirable ultimately.

Again it is class culture and environment that largely shapes a girl.

I don't like low class bitches, girls who are from the hood and such I don't get along with at all. I came from a simple working class background, only connection I had to the hood was the Native kids who got bussed in from it to my school
 

Thot Leader

Kingfisher
Gold Member
game_ethic said:
I remember a time when guys were (rightfully) shamed and/or given warnings for holding beliefs such as this on here. Exhibit A https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-57889.html. The only difference between back then and today’s forum is that there were less closet racists such as Thot Leader and when they did rear their heads, people called them out and sometimes they even got banned as in the case of Requiem. It’s not stretch to say guys with these beliefs are tolerated today.

Translation: "How dare you use free speech to express red-pilled beliefs on Roosh's forum??"

Just because you don't like hearing something, doesn't mean you can prevent other people from saying it. If you think there should be "consequences" for stating an opinion backed up with reason and evidence, then that says more about you than your attempts at shaming and labeling say about me.

Have you checked out any of Roosh's material that isn't directly game-related? If the guy who runs the forum is redpilled on pretty much everything including race, then what do you expect?

Also, do you have a problem with anyone offending other groups or is it just certain ones that need protecting?
 

Buck Wild

Kingfisher
Everybody here needs to calm down. I'm black and I don't have a problem with anything this guy wrote. Men have good reasons for caring about womens' sexual histories, even today.

I also think it's largely futile. I've had sex with a lot of white women, very few of whom could be classified as nightriders, trashy or hip-hop types. I've been the first black guy for most of them. Believe me, these women have absolutely no problems whatsoever entering relationships & marriages with successful, quality white men when their turn on the Buck Wild roller coaster has concluded. The fact is that there is no penalty on women for dating interracially, that train has left the station and won't be back if current trends continue.

My personal experiences aside (which I'm more than happy to expound upon) the fact is that BM/WW pairings are now fairly mainstream at least in large American cities. The idea that this guy is going to be able to tell if a girl has fucked black men before him is just laughable. Not internet LMAO, I mean actually laughable to the point where I chuckled in real life when I read it.
 
This dude would rather raise a son that wasn't his and marry up a single mom than date an otherwise decent chick (assuming so for the sake of argument) who was with a black guy.

If you chill with the most angelic, perfect single mom ever (this is just for the sake of example), you will still be raising some other dude's kid, investing endless time and energy into supporting another man's prodigy and rewarding her insanely poor decision making with all it's retarded consequences.

Compare this to some angelic, perfect woman (again, just for the sake of example), who once dated a normal well adjusted black guy. Hell, even if she dated some "thug".

I think this says a lot about the mentality of this guy, as well as those who support his line of thinking. Nothing wrong with having standards, but these standards are imaginary (how the hell would he know if she doesn't tell him?), but where the standards are NOT imaginary - a bastard child - he is ok with it.

Let's take race out of the equation here and say rule number 2 was something like "if you ever slept with a Guido, no way", but "I'm ok with raising your bastard child for the rest of my life because I'm super compassionate and forgiving like that". Not really following the line of thinking here. Dude is an idiot (in my opinion), but he gets a SLIGHT modicum of respect for the troll of both Tinder and the RVF race enthusiasts.
 

Zevs

Sparrow
Good on him for having those three rules, I have my rules and if women don't like it, then piss off I have no need for you, and all on this forum that have complained or made excuses. I suggest you take a good look in the mirror and try to find the man in you if there is one.
 

Zevs

Sparrow
Robert High Hawk said:
This dude would rather raise a son that wasn't his and marry up a single mom than date an otherwise decent chick (assuming so for the sake of argument) who was with a black guy.

If you chill with the most angelic, perfect single mom ever (this is just for the sake of example), you will still be raising some other dude's kid, investing endless time and energy into supporting another man's prodigy and rewarding her insanely poor decision making with all it's retarded consequences.

Compare this to some angelic, perfect woman (again, just for the sake of example), who once dated a normal well adjusted black guy. Hell, even if she dated some "thug".

I think this says a lot about the mentality of this guy, as well as those who support his line of thinking. Nothing wrong with having standards, but these standards are imaginary (how the hell would he know if she doesn't tell him?), but where the standards are NOT imaginary - a bastard child - he is ok with it.

Let's take race out of the equation here and say rule number 2 was something like "if you ever slept with a Guido, no way", but "I'm ok with raising your bastard child for the rest of my life because I'm super compassionate and forgiving like that". Not really following the line of thinking here. Dude is an idiot (in my opinion), but he gets a SLIGHT modicum of respect for the troll of both Tinder and the RVF race enthusiasts.


Show me where I can find an angelic woman. If there were no men fornicating, then yes we would have angelic women and no single mothers. There is no perfect world and no perfect angelic woman
 
^@zevs,

Think you missed the multiple times where I said "for the sake of argument", as well as the point I was making.

This dude is retarded for being accepting of one standard that is WAY more detrimental to deal with and pathetic to associate with than another (if you even believe that in absolute terms)
 

kosko

Peacock
Gold Member
Robert High Hawk said:
This dude would rather raise a son that wasn't his and marry up a single mom than date an otherwise decent chick (assuming so for the sake of argument) who was with a black guy.

If you chill with the most angelic, perfect single mom ever (this is just for the sake of example), you will still be raising some other dude's kid, investing endless time and energy into supporting another man's prodigy and rewarding her insanely poor decision making with all it's retarded consequences.

Compare this to some angelic, perfect woman (again, just for the sake of example), who once dated a normal well adjusted black guy. Hell, even if she dated some "thug".

I think this says a lot about the mentality of this guy, as well as those who support his line of thinking. Nothing wrong with having standards, but these standards are imaginary (how the hell would he know if she doesn't tell him?), but where the standards are NOT imaginary - a bastard child - he is ok with it.

Let's take race out of the equation here and say rule number 2 was something like "if you ever slept with a Guido, no way", but "I'm ok with raising your bastard child for the rest of my life because I'm super compassionate and forgiving like that". Not really following the line of thinking here. Dude is an idiot (in my opinion), but he gets a SLIGHT modicum of respect for the troll of both Tinder and the RVF race enthusiasts.

Yes, excellent. This why it's goof to point out a dude with not much experience. No man with any knowledge of some would ever sign up to raise another man's child unless he is a devout Christian/Religious type. The only men I see sign up to raise other men's children are those who do the have much experience with women.

The OP Chad would rather date some trailer trash woman with a kid versus a high pedigree woman who dated the Rhodes Black QB in college. Which girl do you think has her head on strait outbid the two mentioned.
 

Papaya

Peacock
Gold Member
quaker13 said:
I'm Black and I'm not the least bit offended by his statement. It's distasteful, but he's entitled to his standards no matter if I do or do not cotton to them.

In terms of white women, I prefer to be their first or second brother. There are exceptions, if the bitch is pretty enough and body crazy enough I'm all in. I generally prefer the "All American" Sorority types, but those are also the hardest to get. Why? because I don't party in a White Fratty Post College environment.

This ain't about me though, I'm not offended. What I don't get is why he would even care. Based on his pics he looks purely like a pump and dump kinda guy. Why would a guy giving off this energy even care if he isn't gonna fuck the girl more than twice?

My bet is he has a small weiner.
Or he just doesn't wanna to be Atlanta Man's eskimo brother.
Or both
 

Rorogue

 
Banned
Nobody can know for sure, but
I think racial insecurity has something to do with it.

For instance, I am brown with a 5.5 incher (at least).

I wouldn't feel apprehensive at all about banging a woman who has been with a lot of black guys. Because they are of a similar race to me. We are both melanated, there's no competition. If she finds them better, then so be it.

I banged a straight African woman last year who had only ever banged black men. I whipped my average sized brown willy out with glee and waited in anticipation for her verdict. She said it was 'pretty good' but then again she didn't opt to meet me again.

I do, however, feel apprehensive if a woman (even a non white woman) has been with a lot of Chads. Our culture, ancestry and genetics are very different. If she deems them better, then it wouldn't make me feel too good.

I suspect this man has a certain image of himself as an expert love maker, and wouldn't want that self image to be disturbed.
 

Man of Truth

 
Banned
PapayaTapper said:
My bet is he has a small weiner.
Or he just doesn't wanna to be Atlanta Man's eskimo brother.
Or both

Sheesh have I stumbled into Jezebel.com

I believe you came under fire in another thread for not liking huge ass women. The irony being its a common hamstering technique to ridicule men on their manhood who don't particular find the Kim Kardashian types attractive.
 

VNvet

Kingfisher
Rorogue said:
I banged a straight African woman last year who had only ever banged black men. I whipped my average sized brown willy out with glee and waited in anticipation for her verdict. She said it was 'pretty good' but then again she didn't opt to meet me again.


Her reason wasn't your dick or that you weren't African.

Her reason was you 'waited in anticipation for her verdict' on your penis... assuming this isn't made up.

That's an awful frame to have.
 

Rorogue

 
Banned
VNvet said:
Rorogue said:
I banged a straight African woman last year who had only ever banged black men. I whipped my average sized brown willy out with glee and waited in anticipation for her verdict. She said it was 'pretty good' but then again she didn't opt to meet me again.


Her reason wasn't your dick or that you weren't African.

Her reason was you 'waited in anticipation for her verdict' on your penis... assuming this isn't made up.

That's an awful frame to have.

you're not wrong. My game at the time was very bad.
 
Top