Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
Boston Bombs on Boylston St?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blaster" data-source="post: 304980" data-attributes="member: 3805"><p>The bombers were terrorists armed with guns and improvised explosives, who had demonstrated willingness to kill random Americans for no reason other than being American. And even then, the shelter-in-place was not ordered until the night when the pair murdered MIT Officer Sean Collier and gotten into a protracted firefight in a heavily populated residential area of Watertown, in which several officers were injured (one of whom eventually died).</p><p></p><p>Again: They were setting off bombs and shooting at police in dense residential neighborhoods. Everyone wanted those motherfuckers caught and hung.</p><p></p><p>Civilians, while a bit unnerved and intimidated by the heavily armed police presence, generally understood the stakes and did their best to cooperate. So far as I know there were no accidents or misunderstandings that ended badly. </p><p></p><p>Also, a fact that tends to be glossed over by coverage of the event (including the excellent Wahlberg movie) is that the shelter-in-place was ended before the target was found and apprehended. Although this does suggest that perhaps the shelter-in-place was a misguided tactic, it does show that the elected leaders were not willing to keep the city shut down indefinitely.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blaster, post: 304980, member: 3805"] The bombers were terrorists armed with guns and improvised explosives, who had demonstrated willingness to kill random Americans for no reason other than being American. And even then, the shelter-in-place was not ordered until the night when the pair murdered MIT Officer Sean Collier and gotten into a protracted firefight in a heavily populated residential area of Watertown, in which several officers were injured (one of whom eventually died). Again: They were setting off bombs and shooting at police in dense residential neighborhoods. Everyone wanted those motherfuckers caught and hung. Civilians, while a bit unnerved and intimidated by the heavily armed police presence, generally understood the stakes and did their best to cooperate. So far as I know there were no accidents or misunderstandings that ended badly. Also, a fact that tends to be glossed over by coverage of the event (including the excellent Wahlberg movie) is that the shelter-in-place was ended before the target was found and apprehended. Although this does suggest that perhaps the shelter-in-place was a misguided tactic, it does show that the elected leaders were not willing to keep the city shut down indefinitely. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
Boston Bombs on Boylston St?
Top