Building Muscle No Gym ?

SlickyBoy

Hummingbird
dies irae said:
Do Freeletics as I recommend here:

http://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-42055-post-871760.html#pid871760





"I've been doing Freeletics for 60 weeks now and my body is as hard as a rock and I never got injured. When you endure the pain of the first weeks it takes you only 2 hours a week on average to complete the full week of training. (not counting the time to recover and time to stretch before the training). You will only need a pull up bar as an equipment, no need to join the gym."


Impressive! Funny, in the first video I could already tell that wasn't an American's house - there's way too many big books in the background. BTW, if you have access to a lot of big books that may or may not get read, they make excellent stands for elevated push ups.
 

Beyond Borders

Peacock
Gold Member
SlickyBoy said:
Impressive! Funny, in the first video I could already tell that wasn't an American's house - there's way too many big books in the background. BTW, if you have access to a lot of big books that may or may not get read, they make excellent stands for elevated push ups.

A statement like that makes it clear that Canadians are far less ignorant... :dodgy:
 

mastauser

 
Banned
I'm not entirely sure, and I won't do any research but it seems Freeletics is a German thing - or at least it's very popular here.

I would see a bunch of these guys (and girls!) outside after dark doing their workout-sessions and motivating each other. I was really impressed by some and I can attest that this is no BS. I don't know if progress will come as quickly as the videos promise, but you will eventually get there.

Joining the site costs money, but you can easily create your own schedule with some research. Their philosophy is: "If you didn't feel like dying at any point during the workout you did something wrong." For the rest its just bodyweight exercises + pull up variations.
 

Fortis

Crow
Gold Member
micha said:
@Fortis

I thought the same thing at first. But to be fair, it's not like you can't do both. It might even be better keep good work ethics ingrained through a tough stretch than to give up on something as vital as fitness.

50 minutes three times a week for a good work-out don't mean you're not doing all you can to make dough.


edit: also handstand pushups. I've been wanting to do these since forever , but somehow never got serious enough to try.

Absolutely, fitness should always be just as important as finances to a man. but when your finances are so low that you have to avoid the gym, then you may have an issue. That said, calisthenics are an excellent way to build a top-tier physique (in my eyes), but it can take longer.

Burpees. Check those out. I imagine you can do burpees and a few other exercises and build a bad ass physique.
 

Downtown

 
Banned
For the legs, just focus on pistols. There are progressions to get you there. And yes it requires coordination and flexibility! Good!

Once you can rep out ten pistols each side, grab a cinder block and get progressive with it.

To be "fit" and "Strong" you really dont need to be able to do much more than a set of ten of pistols on each side. if you're 200 lbs thats like squatting (close to) 400 lbs with both legs.
 

Downtown

 
Banned
Truly, all you need is a bar. And where I live there are these outdoor courses with pull up bars and other stations around.

If you can do 20 dead hang pull ups, lots of dips, a few hand stand push ups and rep out some pistols - you'll be in better physical condition than 99% of the country.
 

civpro

 
Banned
Downtown said:
To be "fit" and "Strong" you really dont need to be able to do much more than a set of ten of pistols on each side. if you're 200 lbs thats like squatting (close to) 400 lbs with both legs.

how so?
 

civpro

 
Banned
I may be wrong about this let me try and work this out in a rough manner.

In a squat, with the legs as the moving/functional bodypart, the dead weight that it is bearing is the Upper Body + Whatever External Load.

So in an unweighted or "bodyweight" squat, each leg is by default/normally carrying "half" the upper body.

When you lift one leg into the air and make it a pistol squat, the working leg is now bearing more than it normally carries. What else does it now carry? First, the other "half" of the upper body. Second, the other leg. So the external load that the working leg has to carry is half bodyweight. Framing it as a two-legged squat, that's like barbell squatting your bodyweight.

Again it's not completely exact, as the back muscles involved are not "halved" in a pistol squat the way the legs are. But a rough guide is: a 200 lbs man doing an unweighted pistol squat is working that leg about the same as it would be in a 200 lbs barbell squat.
 

Downtown

 
Banned
I think using your logic its actually normal load+half body weight. which would make the cumulative total greater than 1. probably more like 5/4 or 6/4 (1.25 or 1.5)
 

Virtus

Pelican
Gold Member
Squatting with two legs 200 bw + 400 load is 300 per leg

A bw pistol squat is 200 for one leg. So yup it be like sqatting 200 load

Difficulty comes from the balancing act
 

Beyond Borders

Peacock
Gold Member
civpro said:
^^ Yes that's true. They're hard as fuck to progress to though, they require crazy flexibility & coordination.

There are plenty of great progressions to get you there, though. The crazy flexibility and coordination is something you work towards. It's not something you "need" so much as a goal.

Start with bodyweight squats, then closed leg squats. Once you get strong there, you can start moving to one-leg versions. For example, start out sitting in a chair and stand on to one leg. Then when you can do sets of 20 with that (nice and controlled), you start in a standing position, sit down, and stand up again for a rep. Then maybe move to assisted pistols, where you hold on to a bar or something as you raise and lower yourself. And so on...

I'm sure there are plenty of other in-between progressions you can work on - it has been a while since I looked them up. Plenty searchable by Google. I think with working towards pistols it's important to aim for the 20-30 rep range before you move to a harder movement because that gives you plenty of time to build up some good technique and balance in that movement before making it harder. You really don't want to take it too fast once you're on one leg or it can be a little hard on the knee.

You can also throw in jump rope, box jumps, and sprints for more leg work without weights.

Personally, I do both weighted movements and bodyweight movements, depending on the day and how I feel, as another poster suggested above. I still stick around 20-rep range even weighted, though I sometimes finish off with a heavier set or two. High reps might not be ideal in many cases, but I'm more worried about getting to pistols than I am about pushing big weight at the moment, and I feel like sticking to lighter weights and higher reps will allow me to practice the movement and build up the muscle endurance I need to maneuver my body like that.

I like to think of my visits to the gym as practice rather than a time to accomplish particular feats (like lifting a certain amount of weight a certain number of times). So everything I do is more about the future than the moment. That said, I still get a damn good workout from my approach.
 

Robert JS

Pigeon
I have no doubt pistol squats are great, but they always give me pain in my knee and lower back when I use the full range of motion [ass to ground].

I have found shrimp squats to be a good alternative. They're basically one legged body squats with the non active leg held behind you. If you're doing them on your right leg, you would curl your left foot to your butt and hold your left ankle with you left hand. Here's a good demonstration.


By the way, a good resource for bodyweight exercises is 'Never Gymless' by Ross Enamait. Ross trains boxers for a living and he knows what he is talking about. Some of the exercises are more hardcore than you can probably imagine - can any of you do clapping one hand pushups?
 

Downtown

 
Banned
I just rocked my first muscle ups yesterday. So psyched. This fall I've checked off squats and hand stand push ups along with the muscle ups - whats next?!
 

rudebwoy

Peacock
Gold Member
After years of lifting, I find weights boring.

I now do 100 pull ups and 100 push ups in every session, followed by a few other routines.

The pull-up/push-up routine consists of doing 10 pull-ups and then 10 push-ups, I do this non stop 4 reps. I take a break and do the same with a different grip, overhand usually. Then I will finish with the remaining 20.

I am delighted how my body has responded to this workout, my arms get jacked right away. My upper body is looking solid, even better than when I am on Test.
 

cmrocks

Robin
I used to do a lot of field geology and we'd live in temporary work camps with no gym. I bought a TRX suspension trainer and used that with decent results. It's no replacement for a gym but it's better than nothing.

TRX
 

Hades

 
Banned
Downtown said:
How do you mean?

I mean, one leg squatting your entire body weight, whereas with two legs each does half the load...?

The pistol squatting 'math' is faulty. It's a lot more like if you can do 10 pistols, you can probably 1 rep 125% of body weight, no where near 200% body weight.

For the record I can do eight or nine pistols at 195# (have not really trained them as I don't much care for rep work) but cannot do anywhere near a 200% body weight back squat. I've been slacking off in the gym for months.

My third day going to the gym I could squat only 85% body weight but could do two pistols no problem.

If you can do 20 on each leg, maybe you can do closer to double bodyweight. If you want to achieve a double bodyweight back squat through lots of bodyweight accessory work (like you can only make it to the gym once a week, but you can hit pistols every other day), you must work some kind of leaping or weighted (or both) variation in there.

The best way to get to do pistol squats, IMO, is through assistols (or assist pistols). Just grab a doorframe and start squatting. So what if you're cheating. I can guarantee that if you can do a set of twenty assisted pistols you can do at least five or more regular pistols. Here's a video of a girl using a resistance band for assistance.



Beyond Borders said:
SlickyBoy said:
Impressive! Funny, in the first video I could already tell that wasn't an American's house - there's way too many big books in the background. BTW, if you have access to a lot of big books that may or may not get read, they make excellent stands for elevated push ups.

A statement like that makes it clear that Canadians are far less ignorant... :dodgy:

Canadians are too broke paying for universal healthcare to afford Kindles. :D

Sensei Creation said:
So I'm basically in a very precarious financial position . One that makes even going out on dates / to the gym unfeasible .

Now I use a lot of my own bodyweight for exercising : Push ups , Curls , Planks and I possess a 10 KG weights that I use regularly , I also possess an Ab Toning belt which I wear when I'm working on my abs ( Or when I'm doing a long and tedious activity which still kinda requires some form of focus ( Such as cooking )

I've noticed some results , I'm still skinny but a bit more defined . Is it actually feasible to substantially build muscle using ones own bodyweight ? Or must I wait until my first pay check ?

Money is sort of a luxury that need not determine what kind of shape you are in.

If you want weights to work out with, you can't beat the cost per pound of sandbags. The hardest part about it is finding a container to put it in. Lower body is very easy to work out with sandbags. Upper body is a little harder. If you want more information I can send you a PDF or two.

Otherwise I would just pick a few calisthenics moves to work on and figure out how to add weight to them. For instance you can do pushups, then weighted pushups (throw some books into a backpack on your back). Or pullups, then wear a backpack and do pullups. There are also more difficult variations of the same moves.
 
Top