Butt becoming America's preference (NY Times)

iop890

Peacock
Orthodox
Gold Member
Good, maybe girls will stop getting awful fake titties and start doing squats. I just hope fake asses never get popular like breast implants have.
 

Deluge

Hummingbird
Gold Member
I'm a sucker skinny bitches with long legs and phat asses. Suffice to say I am very happy about this trend :D

This shift to ass isn't new, the NYT is pretty late in reporting this. A lot girls who previously would only do cardio and "group fitness" classes started hitting the squat rack around a year ago. Around the same time the most popular hipster bar in my (hipster capital) city started running weekly twerk lessons (on top of their dance classes) that became the talk of the town. People started talking about whether or not Nicki Minaj had butt implants. "Fitness blogger" chicks working hard on their butts and getting huge attention for their butt pics. Instagram hotties with big butts started becoming mini-celebrities. When Fancy topped the charts and a lesbian bitch I know started gushing to me about Iggy's booty, that is when I knew we were about to reach critical mass. And then the Anaconda video came along...

gktV5Q2l.jpg


You'd have to have been living under a rock not to notice this until now, fat asses have entered the respectable white mainstream.
 

Basil Ransom

Crow
Gold Member
"You'd have to have been living under a rock not to notice this until now, fat asses have entered the respectable white mainstream."

If you're not careful, it's easy to conflate two similar but distinct trends:

1. Asses as a sexual focus.
2. Big juicy phat asses over little ones.

The NYT is definitely conflating the two. And while #1 is already here, we have some ways to go before #2 is dominant. Without #1 in place, #2 will not happen. But plenty of people, especially white girls who think big asses are gross or ghetto, are stuck on #1 and not yet at #2.

Also, I definitely see a generational trend of older women, 35+ conceiving of their tits as the erogenous zone of choice while it's the ass for younger girls.

I would disagree with you - phat asses have entered the mainstream white consciousness, but they have yet to attain respectability, let alone high status. You can bet that otherwise hot white girls will snark on white girls with phat asses.

We need a bunch of high profile white celebrities and athletes that choose white, big booty girlfriends and wives. And I specifically say white on white because if the girl or the guy in the couple is black, white girls will quickly dismiss it as 'a black people thing' or 'he justs like black girls.'

And Kate Upton as a popular female celebrity with a mediocre ass, is our greatest enemy...
 

MidWest

 
Banned
So Americans were never big on ass?


I can't help but notice that white cats usually never look at girls asses as much as Hispanic and Black guys. I don't think i've ever recall seeing a white guy look back at a passing girl with an ass, but i've seen it a lot with Hispanics and Blacks.

Could it be the culture? Has anybody else notice this or is it just me?
 

TravelerKai

Peacock
Gold Member
Because we have developed having a vice for that. We know what it feels like letting them ride and smash down on top of us with that ass and that pressure. We got suckered into that stuff and almost all of us still are.
 

TravelerKai

Peacock
Gold Member
Basil Ransom said:
In any discussion of big asses, you have to define the "terms" well.

When I praise a girl for having a big ass, it's implied that she is not fat, that she is relatively slim.

Here is a pretty extreme (and amazing) example from the ass thread:



That's my ideal body for a girl - tall, skinny arms and waist, and a huge ass. An ass basically can't look bad if it's big and the girl is slim.

When guys rag on big asses, it's usually because they're picturing a FAT girl.

I agree the face and youth is paramount for beauty, especially for a long term relationship. But every girl can work towards a better ass and get results.

How tall are those girls? Does either one have a FUPA?

I personally hate photos of ass. Everyone photoshops alot here. I don't know how you guys can enjoy photos of this anymore. Only a moving picture tells the truth on ass.

It's all regional. Asians photo shop their eyes acne, and tits. Women here do their legs, waist, and ass.
 

Days of Broken Arrows

Crow
Gold Member
How is this "hope for America?"

The focus on the butt is one of convenience for today's females. They've gotten much fatter and the ass is the one place you can point to as a positive when you gain weight as a woman.

If anything, I think this is a sign we're devolving into a Third World society (there was a previous thread on here long ago about this, so it's not my idea).

The way I see it is like this:

Butts: signify the primal and are preferred by very low class men and women.

Breasts: signify the maternal and are the preference of men from blue collar backgrounds who might be insecure and looking for mother figures (i.e. "I don't care if she's fat -- look at them boobs!").

Legs: long legs are a sign of good breeding and point to classiness in a woman.

Legs were a big deal in the 1980s. But we had a different society and different breed of woman back then. They were bred to be leaner, for one thing. Back then, a fat girl making a video like "All About That Bass" would have been laughed out of town. Now she's a celebrity.

This is not the sign of a society that's healthy -- in any sense of that word.

I'm all for slumming, but to see the entire country go in this direction is disheartening. It's also annoying when The New York Times puts its stamp of approval on a trend. There's usually an ulterior motive. See my sentence #1 for that motive.

Addendum: I forgot to mention large asses don't age well. Having seen my female classmates grow older ("My eyes, my eyes!!") I can tell you what's "hotttt" in that area at 18 becomes scary once the woman in question has pumped out a kid or three. You've been warned.
 

AnonymousBosch

 
Banned
Gold Member
Days of Broken Arrows said:
How is this "hope for America?"

The focus on the butt is one of convenience for women. They've gotten much fatter and the ass is the one place you can point to as a positive when you gain weight as a woman.

If anything, I think this is a sign we're devolving into a Third World society (there was a previous thread on here long ago about this, so it's not my idea).

The way I see it is like this:

Butts: signify the primal and are preferred by very low class men and women.

Breasts: signify the maternal and are the preference of men from blue collar backgrounds who might be insecure and looking for mother figures (i.e. "I don't care if she's fat -- look at them boobs!").

Legs: long legs are a sign of good breeding and point to classiness in a woman.

Legs were a big deal in the 1980s. But we had a different society and different breed of woman than. They were bred to be leaner, for one thing. Back then, a fat girl making a video like "All About That Bass" would have been laughed out of town. Now she's a celebrity.

This is not the sign of a society that's healthy -- in any sense of that word.

I'm all for slumming, but to see the entire country go in this direction is disheartening. It's also annoying when The New York Times puts its stamp of approval on a trend. There's usually an ulterior motive. See my sentence #1 for that motive.

Yeah, I'm not buying the hype. What they're selling seems to be not the toned, proportionate arses of athletic women, but exaggerated, cartoonish hippo-esque arses. This gives overweight women a reason to think they're far higher value than they are, and just adds another, more socially-acceptable way for girls to attention whore.

Women have this delusion that if you squeeze fat, untoned flesh into leggings it becomes magically-tight, so get used to holding down your lunch on the street as fat girls think they're all that.

This trend is only being hyped because the standards it encourages are lower and take less discipline to achieve.

I also suspect this also has something to do with the progressive agenda to normalise anal sex as superior to Penis-In-Vagina. Anal sex: like trying to push a Doberman through a Doggy Door, while the Doberman shits on you.

For me: long, toned legs up to her ears, coupled with feminine deportment. Does she walk with feminine grace?

More my speed:

tumblr_lhv8fo7SAg1qc5nzeo1_500.jpg
 

Basil Ransom

Crow
Gold Member
"What they're selling seems to be not the toned, proportionate arses of athletic women, but exaggerated, cartoonish hippo-esque arses. "

There is such a range of athletic women that athletic is practically meaningless. The ass of a weightlifter? The ass of a volleyball player? Of a sprinter? A marathon runner? An ass can be at once large and belong to an athlete.

To be sure, a big ass can be cover for a girl who is simply fat - thus my post before highlighting skinny girls with a big ass.

" Butts: signify the primal and are preferred by very low class men and women."

In an age when having any balls are principally limited to the lower classes, this is a compliment. Going "primal" in various ways is frequently doled out as advice here, so I fail to see the problem.

Although, I would bet ass-men are more prone to flings.
 

Blaster

Ostrich
Gold Member
My theory on this is that butts have always been preferred, it was just considered more vulgar and was not discussed as overtly as today.
 

POASTER

 
Banned
This has been long coming.

The breakthrough pioneer was Sir Mix A Lot's magum opus "Baby Got Back" of course. To this day whenever I am on a dancefloor and this song gets played - and it always does - all the girls go wild, start grinding hard and singing along.

Twenty years of hip-hop culture permeating American society has taught us all the glories of DAT ASS. I welcome this trend. This is yet another example of African-American culture spilling over to White-American culture.

I think another reason is that naturally big boobs are just rare. Asses are more abundant, easier to achieve, and more enduring. That's why most of my guy friends say the same thing - ass is necessary and breasts are like the icing on the cake but not as necessary. What other choice is there?

Legs have been overshadowed in America which is unfortunate. I was never a big legs guy until I went to Europe, which forever traumatized me. Now I cannot be attracted to short girls anymore, like I used to be. Seeing so many long-legged girls over there forever altered my tastes.

So a lot of this stuff is just the effect of what you’re exposed to. Same with race. When I grew up in a really White neighborhood, those were the only girls I liked. Then I lived and worked in a Latina area and guess what? I developed a Latina fetish.

This trend just highlights how easily humans are influenced by environment and media, even when they think they are strong-willed.
 

berserk

 
Banned
Northern European bros, have you noticed a lot more ass on girls? I have been back and either my tastes have changed - noticing girls with bigger asses more, or a lot of young girls really have more ass. I see a lot more round big asses on the street, still with flat shoes and jeans instead of heels and tight skirts, but I'm not complaining.
 
Top