@cernovich and @heartiste accounts suspended

Status
Not open for further replies.

SunW

Woodpecker
I wish I could find my post where I predicted that they would ban everyone on Twitter who is red pill/neomasculine eventually, but it's coming, so this isn't a surprise. Go ahead, join Twitter if you want. You get on their platforms, you'll lose. That's the end game.

Ultimately, the victory is stopping the spread of their platforms. "Oh you're on Twitter? Sorry to hear."
 

samsamsam

Peacock
Gold Member
You mean this "mom and dad should have watched tv that night" where erections go to die colored hair warthog?

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Randi_Harper

OBSDyGirl.png
 

Blaster

Ostrich
Gold Member
dads said:
As a black man, I'm not a fan of a lot of Heartiste's political talk. However, his thoughts on everything else are miles past exceptional. I don't have to agree with a 100% of someone's thoughts to support them 100%. Regardless of how he would feel towards me as a human being personally, the idea of the "Twitter Thought Police" cracking down on him makes me sick to my fucking stomach.

I hear you. I get really sick of his "diversity+proximity=war" mantra and much of what he writes as "RealTalk" is essentially anti-black propaganda.

But I also think that he has a lot of valid points and his ideological opponents are just as bad (if not dramatically worse and often flat-out hypocrites). It's their idiocy that gives Heartiste his power. I've seen blatant anti-white racism (not "reverse racism," just racism). I've seen minority resentment. It's hard as fuck to find any discussion about immigration that isn't maliciously biased one way or the other. Liberal SWPL hypocrite racism is real. Many of them live in white communities, marry white people, send their kids to white-dominated schools, and patronize white businesses yet they will be the first ones to go denouncing the Confederate Battle Flag. They will make anti-racist jokes to other whites show off how sensitive they are and to conceal their own doubts racist beliefs.

That's not how diversity really works. When diversity actually works, it's because the diverse people set aside their fucking differences, and they do that by focusing on some shared values. Whether it's getting laid, playing a sport (or a videogame), running a business, criticizing corporate media agendas, or planning a community event, everyone puts the shared goal ABOVE their differences. They don't dwell on their grievances and obsess about internal power relationships or structural biases. They just work together and get shit done.

The pro-diversity crowd has it all wrong. They're well past the point where their rhetoric is counter-productive, serving only to keep race on everyone's mind and distracting otherwise good people from focusing on things that actually matter. Sure, hardcore racists still exist. But that's the thing: they are hardcore racists for a reason and the only real way to handle the holdouts is one at a time (or just wait for them to die). Meanwhile, the pro-diversity agendas are doing nothing but spread resentment on all sides and raise a new generation of racists with backwards priorities. In my view, a reactionary like Heartiste is a symptom of this problem. If the pro-diversity agenda would chill the fuck out and stop being such hypocrites and assholes, then Heartiste would not have the same appeal. He would probably not bother to talk about it half as much as he does.
 

CaptainS

Hummingbird
dog said:
I don't want to derail this thread but I feel like this is one of those discussions that the manosphere needs to have sometime soon, even if it is a third rail. The portion of the "red pill" community that trends toward white nationalism is very off-putting to people. On the other hand, they do bring up good points about what seems like a coordinated effort to destroy European populations and identity.

It's unfortunately very difficult to have a discussion about this sort of thing, and it would be nice to hammer out a coherent philosophy in regards to the race issue. The only way I can think of doing that is actually talking about it. I know way too many quality red pill Black, Asian, and Latino dudes, and sticking all of them into a category of "non-white" and labeling them "bad" doesn't help our cause.
The problems aren't race related, they are cultural. Not liking "black culture" is called racism in an effort to shut down opposition.

To the thread:
Isn't that why Mike's friend "The Derb" was fired? He wrote an article about avoiding blacks because enough of them are openly hostile to whites.
 

WestIndianArchie

Peacock
Gold Member
So private actors use their contracts to restrict activity on their private network.

I'm sure their politics are okay with this, Roissy at least.

WIA
 

Demented Kim

 
Banned
...i'm not taking the mickey to dads...however, as a black man living in africa, i find heartiste's brand of reasoning to be brutaly honest if not outright intriguing...you see, down here we are close to 100% black and we still fight over tribalism and it won't end...we even have xenophobia in some quaters....we even have tribe based soccer teams....how is that one's passionate appreciation for his heritage and identity and its perks be considered as an issue in the manosphere and for its constituents...we have a saying, " having eaten the whole cow, why leave out the tail"...are we also keen on uniformity of thought?
 
There are enough topics about race. I want to know how we can get back at the motherfuckers who did this to them but I don't really use social media.
 

Samseau

Eagle
Orthodox
Gold Member
If this how Twitter wants to roll, we all know it's just a matter of time before they overreach and cause a fallout a la Reddit style. Watch them try and ban someone like Trump for being "offensive," or something like that.
 

Atlanta Man

Ostrich
Gold Member
Samseau said:
Blick Mang said:
I don't see any reason why he should have been suspended.

I'm of the Heartistian school of red pill thought, but even here many don't like him. It's a shame really, he's one of the only few willing to bridge game realtalk and political realtalk.


It's because most men are far more sensitive with their feelings than they realize.
Trust me it was not a man. I do not like Heartiste, so I do not go to his site. That is how men deal with sites they object to. Women see something they do not like and want it banned, the guy fired and everybody to pat them on the back for dealing with a "problematic" person.

I think Heartiste is a troll and he went from a good game site to a Stormfront light, race baiting site for his white nationalist base of daily visitors-But I do not want him banned, I don't care if he advocates for a return to slavery, I do not want him banned. I personally disagree with him but I would rather refute his ideas, not ban him from a platform to speak. Once people start banning people for saying things they do not like then you end up going down a slippery slope, I do not like Heartiste's views on race,but most women would not like my views on gender- So if they can ban Heartiste, what is to stop them from banning my account for my views on"rape culture",false rape accusations and Bill Cosby's innocence. Not popular views, like Heartiste's, but they are legitimate thought out opinions.

Remember, the people that banned Heartiste are the same people demanding for no more net anonymity and having to use your real name for everything you do online. Imagine if SJWs could find my real name, your real name or Heartiste's-do you think they would hesitate to inform our employers and pull a Dax on us and get us fired? Make us unemployable for years and destroy our Google search results, and not not bat an eye? You bet your ass they would...
 

CaptainS

Hummingbird
TheWastelander said:
There are enough topics about race. I want to know how we can get back at the motherfuckers who did this to them but I don't really use social media.
You can't. Twitter is completely in bed with the SJWs - a few reports will get a conservative or red pill account deleted while a million reports won't do anything to SJWs accounts.

The only thing to do is not use Twitter.

Same goes for mainstream entertainment. John Stewart has been calling Trump "Fuckface" on his show and Twitter and Kimmel had that midget on his show calling him a bastard in Spanish - in both cases it's met with thunderous applause.

RjvZLzs.gif
 
Captainstabbin said:
TheWastelander said:
There are enough topics about race. I want to know how we can get back at the motherfuckers who did this to them but I don't really use social media.
You can't. Twitter is completely in bed with the SJWs - a few reports will get a conservative or red pill account deleted while a million reports won't do anything to SJWs accounts.

The only thing to do is not use Twitter.

Same goes for mainstream entertainment. John Stewart has been calling Trump "Fuckface" on his show and Twitter and Kimmel had that midget on his show calling him a bastard in Spanish - in both cases it's met with thunderous applause.

RjvZLzs.gif

You're probably right. Also, I laughed at that gif.

The fact that they're resorting to such retarded insults against Trump means they're scared and he's doing something right. Shit isn't even remotely humorous or sophisticated compared to the way they mock mainstream cuckservative Republican politicians they know their guys will beat.

But this thread has already been derailed enough. The Donald has his own thread!
 

Honorable Man

Woodpecker
Bannings on Twitter -> race issues -> Donald Trump

Guys maybe the next topic of discussion in this thread can be about how God isn't real or how both political parties in the USA are the same.
 

Roosh

Cardinal
Orthodox
Twitter is now in bed with two forces that will make it increasingly hostile for us: money and SJW's. The former will probably do us in faster since corporations don't want to advertise where there is "misogynist" speech present. Give it 5 years, but Twitter will eventually have the moderation ethic of Reddit.

Facebook is already long gone. It's getting impossible to share a link that is critical of women or makes fun of them without getting a one-month ban. I've been suspended 6 or so times because of it.

While Facebook/Twitter serves some benefit to promote links/books, it wouldn't be wise to be dependent on them.
 

dog

Robin
Captainstabbin said:
TheWastelander said:
There are enough topics about race. I want to know how we can get back at the motherfuckers who did this to them but I don't really use social media.
You can't. Twitter is completely in bed with the SJWs - a few reports will get a conservative or red pill account deleted while a million reports won't do anything to SJWs accounts.

The only thing to do is not use Twitter.

The SJW takeover of silicon valley and digital media has to be one of the defining characteristics of the last decade. All of these platforms started off as very free speech, were infiltrated, and have been slowly choking out any dissenting viewpoints for being "offensive".

I'm sure there's some sort of metaphor there for the West in general. If our side ever wins, historians and sociologists should have a field day trying to piece it together. There are certainly some lessons to gleaned from the mess.
 

Quintus Curtius

Crow
Gold Member
Roosh said:
Twitter is now in bed with two forces that will make it increasingly hostile for us: money and SJW's. The former will probably do us in faster since corporations don't want to advertise where there is "misogynist" speech present. Give it 5 years, but Twitter will eventually have the moderation ethic of Reddit.

Facebook is already long gone. It's getting impossible to share a link that is critical of women or makes fun of them without getting a one-month ban. I've been suspended 6 or so times because of it.

While Facebook/Twitter serves some benefit to promote links/books, it wouldn't be wise to be dependent on them.


What about Google Plus and YouTube?

Problem with Google Plus is that nobody seems to use it...
 

CaptainS

Hummingbird
dog said:
Captainstabbin said:
TheWastelander said:
There are enough topics about race. I want to know how we can get back at the motherfuckers who did this to them but I don't really use social media.
You can't. Twitter is completely in bed with the SJWs - a few reports will get a conservative or red pill account deleted while a million reports won't do anything to SJWs accounts.

The only thing to do is not use Twitter.

The SJW takeover of silicon valley and digital media has to be one of the defining characteristics of the last decade. All of these platforms started off as very free speech, were infiltrated, and have been slowly choking out any dissenting viewpoints for being "offensive".

I'm sure there's some sort of metaphor there for the West in general. If our side ever wins, historians and sociologists should have a field day trying to piece it together. There are certainly some lessons to gleaned from the mess.

Unfortunately, our side only wins when the illusion of safety is taken away. Remember the thread about women being more feminine when they're scared? The world will never work in our favor when women and weak men are free to act like idiots, make any wild unsubstantiated claims and even start physical attacks with no ramifications other than praise for their "bravery".

That means that the world will have to be a scarier place before these weak SJWs, fearing for their lives, come back to real men begging for protection. In exchange, they will become the submissive, feminine and even physically fit women they used to be - and be happier for it!

There are certainly some lessons to gleaned from the mess.

Those lessons are quickly forgotten when the danger passes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top