Dupe
Civil War II: The Coming Breakup of America - a book published in 1996 predicted these riots almost to the day
- Thread starter STG
- Start date
Tactics of communism:
Rt. Rev. Msgr. Fulton J. Sheen, D.D.. PRINTED AND PUBLISHED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. BY.
"5. Q. How does the Revolution take place?
A. It begins with a civil war which is the condition of overthrowing the established order. "Revolution signifies the forcible invasion of the proletariat into the domain of property. . . . The conquest of power by the proletariat is the violent overthrow of . . , armies, police, bureaucratic hierarchy, judiciary, parliaments, etc. (Program, p.36.)
6. Q. Will violence continue even after the civil war?
A. Yes, until everyone who is opposed to Communism is crushed. "After the civil war has been brought to an end, the stubborn class struggle continues in the form of a struggle between the survivors of previous economic systems." (Ibid., p. 48.)
7. Q. Since Communism means the aboli tion of all private properly what will happen to the small landowners, peasants, farmers and
the like?
A. They must be crushed with violence. The “Proletariat.. . must mercilessly suppress the slightest opposition on the part of the village bourgeoisie who ally themselves with the landowners,” (Program, p. 49.)
8. Q. What will happen lo the city people who own their own homes, e. g., the grocer, the butcher or the sahsman?
A. They are to be left their property for a while "to win them over” (Program, p. 49), but in the
end all private property must be abolished. (Program, p. 30.)
9. Q, During this period of civil war when private properly is confiscated in the name of the proletarian Revolution, who plays the lead¬
ing rdle—the Communist Party or the workers whom it claims to aid?
A. “The Communist Party plays the leading role ” (Program, p, $1, italics in original.)
10. Q. Does that mean there will be another party permitted in a country after the establishment of Communism?
A. No, Communism tolerates no rival parties. "The essential difference between the existence of parties in the Western world and with us Commun ists, is that the sole possibility with Communism is the following: One party is in power and all theothers are in jail/* (Troud, November 13, 1927.) Troud is the official organ of the Central Committee of the Syndicate of Soviet Workers.
11. Q. Will the Communist Party ever really renounce its control over the workers?
A. No. "The Communist Party will never renounce the role of its direction and its revolutionary initiative. (International Correspondence,
August 5, 1933.)
12. Q. Against which groups will Communism fight during the civil war in order to establish the dictatorship of the Communist Party ?
A. Against (a) all forms of private property, (b) against all religions, Jewish, Protestant, Catholic, (c) and against all education except materialistic. "The confiscation of all property.” (Program,p. 40.) "Systematically and unswervingly combating religion.” (Program, p. 53.) "Reconstructthe whole of education on the basis of scientific materialism.’* (Program, p. 54.)
13. Q. Whom do the Communists regard as the greatest forces standing in the way of world revolution?
A. The main obstacles on the road toward the establishment of the proletarian social revolution are . , . Catholic trade unions, Y. M. C. A*, Jewish Zionist organizations. , . . The American Federation of Labor, etc. (Program, pp, 68 and 69.)"
Rt. Rev. Msgr. Fulton J. Sheen, D.D.. PRINTED AND PUBLISHED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. BY.
"5. Q. How does the Revolution take place?
A. It begins with a civil war which is the condition of overthrowing the established order. "Revolution signifies the forcible invasion of the proletariat into the domain of property. . . . The conquest of power by the proletariat is the violent overthrow of . . , armies, police, bureaucratic hierarchy, judiciary, parliaments, etc. (Program, p.36.)
6. Q. Will violence continue even after the civil war?
A. Yes, until everyone who is opposed to Communism is crushed. "After the civil war has been brought to an end, the stubborn class struggle continues in the form of a struggle between the survivors of previous economic systems." (Ibid., p. 48.)
7. Q. Since Communism means the aboli tion of all private properly what will happen to the small landowners, peasants, farmers and
the like?
A. They must be crushed with violence. The “Proletariat.. . must mercilessly suppress the slightest opposition on the part of the village bourgeoisie who ally themselves with the landowners,” (Program, p. 49.)
8. Q. What will happen lo the city people who own their own homes, e. g., the grocer, the butcher or the sahsman?
A. They are to be left their property for a while "to win them over” (Program, p. 49), but in the
end all private property must be abolished. (Program, p. 30.)
9. Q, During this period of civil war when private properly is confiscated in the name of the proletarian Revolution, who plays the lead¬
ing rdle—the Communist Party or the workers whom it claims to aid?
A. “The Communist Party plays the leading role ” (Program, p, $1, italics in original.)
10. Q. Does that mean there will be another party permitted in a country after the establishment of Communism?
A. No, Communism tolerates no rival parties. "The essential difference between the existence of parties in the Western world and with us Commun ists, is that the sole possibility with Communism is the following: One party is in power and all theothers are in jail/* (Troud, November 13, 1927.) Troud is the official organ of the Central Committee of the Syndicate of Soviet Workers.
11. Q. Will the Communist Party ever really renounce its control over the workers?
A. No. "The Communist Party will never renounce the role of its direction and its revolutionary initiative. (International Correspondence,
August 5, 1933.)
12. Q. Against which groups will Communism fight during the civil war in order to establish the dictatorship of the Communist Party ?
A. Against (a) all forms of private property, (b) against all religions, Jewish, Protestant, Catholic, (c) and against all education except materialistic. "The confiscation of all property.” (Program,p. 40.) "Systematically and unswervingly combating religion.” (Program, p. 53.) "Reconstructthe whole of education on the basis of scientific materialism.’* (Program, p. 54.)
13. Q. Whom do the Communists regard as the greatest forces standing in the way of world revolution?
A. The main obstacles on the road toward the establishment of the proletarian social revolution are . , . Catholic trade unions, Y. M. C. A*, Jewish Zionist organizations. , . . The American Federation of Labor, etc. (Program, pp, 68 and 69.)"
Last edited:
24. Q. Is the goal of American Communism different from the goal of International Communism?
A. No, in both the goal is the establishment of die proletarian dictatorship by revolution. "In the revolutionary situation the Communist Party . . . wins some of the armed forces to its side, and leads the effective majority of the population to the seizure of State power. . . . Above all they need the armed forces.” (Earl Browder, What Is Communism?, pp, 164 and 165.)
25. Q. What docs the word “Fascism” mean to a Communist?
A. It means anything that is anti-Communist. Browder identifies it with the DuPonts and a "system of murder and concentration camps for everyone who raises his voice against exploitation and oppression/’ {What Is Communism?, p. 105.) Dimitrov says it is "rabid reaction and counter-revo lution*" (Working Class Against Fascism, p. 14.)
Note: In order to think clearly about Communism it is well always to translate the word Fascism whenever they use it as anti-Communist. When the Communist orator pleads for the union of the employed, or the unemployed, or the Negro, or students to fight against Fascism, remember Fascism to a Communist is anti-Communism,
28. Q. Which then is the greater danger for America?
A. Communism. It must be borne in mind that the political problem of the world is not a choice between Communism and Fascism. There are other kinds of government besides the Fascist, for example, our own American form. Rather the struggle is between Communism and anti-Communism whatever forms the latter may assume.
31. What do the Communists mean when they use the word “Peace”?
A, Peace means the establishment of the Communist regime. Peace under any other regime is inconceivable to Communism. “The fight to maintain peace is a fight against Fascism, a fight that is essentially revolutionary.” (G. Dimitrov, The Untied Struggle for Peace, p. 18, Workers' Library edition.) “The anti-war struggle of the masses must be very’ closely combined with the struggle against Fascism [anti-Communism] and the Fascist movement.” (Resolutions of the Seventh Annual Congress, International Correspondence, Septem¬
ber 19, 1935, p. 1184. Brackets mine.)
32. Q. What are we to understand by Communism presenting itself as the Enemy of War and Fascism and the friend of the Former mid
Laborer?
A, We are to understand that Communism has changed not its principle!:, but its tactics. In order to understand the difference let us assume that A is a robber by profession. He decides to rob B, C and D, forcibly entering their homes, hitting each over the head with a bludgeon and then steal ing their possessions. He succeeds with B but finds that C and D put up considerable opposition and
fight him off, and thereafter carry guns to prevent a future robbery. A now decides to give up violence as a means of robbery. And so he plans to rob E, F and G in a new way. He invites them to dinner, tells them that he likes their families, their
children, goes to church with them, joins the same golf clubs and then is finally invited into their homes for a week-end during which he robs them. Note that the principle of A’s life would have remained unchanged, but bis tactics would have changed. He
would have used non-violent methods to attain his end.
Now this is what Communism is doing today. It has found that its revolutionary approach has been unsuccessful. Some countries have resisted and organized, and so, it decides to change its tactics and to use non-revolutionary approaches to attain revolutionary ends.
38. Q. Would the United Front tactics mean that Communism would seek to enter Catholic organizations in order to secure “pro-
dominant influence”?
A. Yes. "It would exert a powerful influence on the ranks of the Catholics, anarchists and unorganized ivorkers , even on those who had temporarily become the victims of Fascist [anti-Communist] demagogy* (G. Dimitrov, The Working Class vs.
Fascism, p. 32. Italics in original; brackets mine.)
44. Q. What pledge did Maxim Litvinoff give on behalf of the U. S. S. R. when the United States recognized Soviet Russia on November
16, 1933?
A. "To refrain, and to restrain all persons in government service and all organizations of the government .. . from any act, overt or covert, liable in any way whatsoever to injure the tranquillity and prosperity, order or security, of the whole or any part of the United States.”
45* Q. Wlial is Litvinoft reported to have said to fellow Communists after the signing of the pledge?
A. "Notice that the pledge did not exclude the activities of the Third International.*’
T9. Q. Did Earl Browder, despite his love of America, advocate the United Front tactics to win over the sailors and soldiers to foment
revolution in Ameriea?
A. Yes. "Soldiers and sailors can be and must be won for the revolution. All revolutions have been made with weapons which the overthrown rulers have relied on for their protection.” (What Is Communism?> p. 16f, italics in original.)
53. Q. Do the new tactics mean that Communism has forgotten its revolutionary goal and that it has given w r ay to peaceful reform or
the continuation of American institutions?
A. No. "Only downright scoundrels . . . hopeless idiots can think that by means of the United Front tactics Communism is capitulating to Social Democracy." (D, Z. Manuilsky* The Work of the Seventh Congress, p. 59.)
A. No, in both the goal is the establishment of die proletarian dictatorship by revolution. "In the revolutionary situation the Communist Party . . . wins some of the armed forces to its side, and leads the effective majority of the population to the seizure of State power. . . . Above all they need the armed forces.” (Earl Browder, What Is Communism?, pp, 164 and 165.)
25. Q. What docs the word “Fascism” mean to a Communist?
A. It means anything that is anti-Communist. Browder identifies it with the DuPonts and a "system of murder and concentration camps for everyone who raises his voice against exploitation and oppression/’ {What Is Communism?, p. 105.) Dimitrov says it is "rabid reaction and counter-revo lution*" (Working Class Against Fascism, p. 14.)
Note: In order to think clearly about Communism it is well always to translate the word Fascism whenever they use it as anti-Communist. When the Communist orator pleads for the union of the employed, or the unemployed, or the Negro, or students to fight against Fascism, remember Fascism to a Communist is anti-Communism,
28. Q. Which then is the greater danger for America?
A. Communism. It must be borne in mind that the political problem of the world is not a choice between Communism and Fascism. There are other kinds of government besides the Fascist, for example, our own American form. Rather the struggle is between Communism and anti-Communism whatever forms the latter may assume.
31. What do the Communists mean when they use the word “Peace”?
A, Peace means the establishment of the Communist regime. Peace under any other regime is inconceivable to Communism. “The fight to maintain peace is a fight against Fascism, a fight that is essentially revolutionary.” (G. Dimitrov, The Untied Struggle for Peace, p. 18, Workers' Library edition.) “The anti-war struggle of the masses must be very’ closely combined with the struggle against Fascism [anti-Communism] and the Fascist movement.” (Resolutions of the Seventh Annual Congress, International Correspondence, Septem¬
ber 19, 1935, p. 1184. Brackets mine.)
32. Q. What are we to understand by Communism presenting itself as the Enemy of War and Fascism and the friend of the Former mid
Laborer?
A, We are to understand that Communism has changed not its principle!:, but its tactics. In order to understand the difference let us assume that A is a robber by profession. He decides to rob B, C and D, forcibly entering their homes, hitting each over the head with a bludgeon and then steal ing their possessions. He succeeds with B but finds that C and D put up considerable opposition and
fight him off, and thereafter carry guns to prevent a future robbery. A now decides to give up violence as a means of robbery. And so he plans to rob E, F and G in a new way. He invites them to dinner, tells them that he likes their families, their
children, goes to church with them, joins the same golf clubs and then is finally invited into their homes for a week-end during which he robs them. Note that the principle of A’s life would have remained unchanged, but bis tactics would have changed. He
would have used non-violent methods to attain his end.
Now this is what Communism is doing today. It has found that its revolutionary approach has been unsuccessful. Some countries have resisted and organized, and so, it decides to change its tactics and to use non-revolutionary approaches to attain revolutionary ends.
38. Q. Would the United Front tactics mean that Communism would seek to enter Catholic organizations in order to secure “pro-
dominant influence”?
A. Yes. "It would exert a powerful influence on the ranks of the Catholics, anarchists and unorganized ivorkers , even on those who had temporarily become the victims of Fascist [anti-Communist] demagogy* (G. Dimitrov, The Working Class vs.
Fascism, p. 32. Italics in original; brackets mine.)
44. Q. What pledge did Maxim Litvinoff give on behalf of the U. S. S. R. when the United States recognized Soviet Russia on November
16, 1933?
A. "To refrain, and to restrain all persons in government service and all organizations of the government .. . from any act, overt or covert, liable in any way whatsoever to injure the tranquillity and prosperity, order or security, of the whole or any part of the United States.”
45* Q. Wlial is Litvinoft reported to have said to fellow Communists after the signing of the pledge?
A. "Notice that the pledge did not exclude the activities of the Third International.*’
T9. Q. Did Earl Browder, despite his love of America, advocate the United Front tactics to win over the sailors and soldiers to foment
revolution in Ameriea?
A. Yes. "Soldiers and sailors can be and must be won for the revolution. All revolutions have been made with weapons which the overthrown rulers have relied on for their protection.” (What Is Communism?> p. 16f, italics in original.)
53. Q. Do the new tactics mean that Communism has forgotten its revolutionary goal and that it has given w r ay to peaceful reform or
the continuation of American institutions?
A. No. "Only downright scoundrels . . . hopeless idiots can think that by means of the United Front tactics Communism is capitulating to Social Democracy." (D, Z. Manuilsky* The Work of the Seventh Congress, p. 59.)
I'm leaning more toward predictive programming not prediction.
He most likely already knew about this Coronavirus plan set to be rolled out in the year 2020 when he wrote the book.
He probably works for a government agency like the CIA, as do countless authors.
Another perfect example would be Dan Koontz and his book The Eyes of Darkness. Absolutely predictive programming.
I have seen alot of calls and predictions for Civil War following the election in the last few days.
I wonder if this will become the default position over the next month or two on both sides. Kind of like the plan for a couple of kids to settle the score after school in the smoking pit.
I wonder if this will become the default position over the next month or two on both sides. Kind of like the plan for a couple of kids to settle the score after school in the smoking pit.
I don’t see it. As we enter into the colder months everything should start to simmer down. It appears the BLM riots are starting to Peter out... only to be resumed next election cycle of course.
As long as there’s Netflix and other useful distractions no ones going to want to go to war. An insurrection? Sure maybe on the coasts. Cities will get more violent for sure but the vast majority of Americans don’t want to kill each other.
As long as there’s Netflix and other useful distractions no ones going to want to go to war. An insurrection? Sure maybe on the coasts. Cities will get more violent for sure but the vast majority of Americans don’t want to kill each other.
I'm afraid you're right. I was hoping things would heat up so fast that a true reset could happen, and we could likely "surgically remove" the cancer within our western societies. In the end it's just two dogs barking and snarling at each other through a fence, while one owner keeps extending his property line into the other dogs yard.
So... I guess the next 4 years I'm going to be learning ... Russian ?... and become an expat.
Ironside
Robin
Nah there's no way this will stop, it's impossible to put the breaks on this at this point.
This reminds me that I should do the "how I learned Russian post" that I promised @gework I would do and has been on my to do list for months. I did one on the old RVF, but it seems to have not survived the transition.
Interesting, I forgot about winter. On the negative, winter is going to bring more coronavirus or influenza like illnesses and prompts for the lockdowns to continue.
On the positive, continued lockdowns are going to continue to put pressure on regular white people, motivate them and free up their time for political action. Also on the positive, people don't have the stomach for rioting on foot in winter but it doesn't stop truck and tractor parades, which conservatives seem to love (See Canada Yellow Vests).
So, if the election is contested, Democrats can really only riot and secede in warm weather states like CA and OR and will fizzle out come the first snowfall. They will maybe try to hold things neutral until the spring of 2021 to start being aggressive again to coincide with natural chimp out season.
Cold weather is definitely going to be a factor here. After all, the foot "soldiers" of the left aren't very well equip and are by their very nature dregs of society. So, I don't seem them affording Haley Hansen gear. And, its cold and pussy's don't like the cold.
On the other hand, blm is flush with cash?
That said, I think the weather will on be a delay. The lines dividing us are way too deep. And the motivations on both sides way too high. We're simply two different kinds of people. I see this in my home town, which has become two towns - one that supports the police and America and the other that supports blm and gays. We're simply not compatible with each other.
We have tons of pockets of alt lite good 'ole boys down south. But, you have tons of Jewish Golem threat (brainwashed gibsmedat joggers) down where I live in the majority urban areas. Further south in the black mud belt towards central Mississippi and Alabama you have redneck blacks that are conservative by nature but vote democrat/liberal for the past 50years..I'm not sure how they'll react
Seems that over the last decade the US has become politically divided and more polarized not in a state by state breakdown as much as large pop. city on the left vs suburban/small towns/rural on the right (exceptions of course but generally speaking). Just look at the blue vs red map of the last election in 2016.
