Simeon_Strangelight said:It's old news, but Paul Nungasser - the victim of the Mattress Girl actually got some settlement cash from Columbia University:
http://time.com/4858979/columbia-university-paul-nungesser-mattress-girl-emma-sulkowicz/
God bess the US legal system - sometimes at least.
IN Germany he would not have gotten anything, but on the other hand - he would not have been accused there over such fleeting allegations.
What are your estimates regarding the settlement money the guy got?
1-5 mio. $ ?
Of course it was only his because he did not back down, did not apologize, did not cuck out and refused to be bullied off campus. Most Soyboys now would buckle down like a sack of potatoes.
-------------------
Was checking up what the lying bitch was doing:
http://theinvisibledog.org/the-floating-world-by-emma-sulkowicz/
http://www.emmasulkowicz.com/
Also her porn vid is still online - the level of exhibitionism on her part is enough to eek out a moderate existence as an artist.
http://www.cecinestpasunviol.com/
Delicious Tacos hit on her during one expo.
To make it as an artist this is not an incorrect behavior pattern - this type of mental state is fine. Too bad that she was too brainwashed by the current SJW-mindset.
Also look at her bio:
And she is not dumb either - it's frankly more a shame and a symbol of our times than anything else.
He would be accused as well in Germany - ever heard of Gewaltschutzgesetz? (the law to provide security from violence).
You say whatever you want under oath (Eidesstatliche Versicherung), just end it by 'I am afraid' and, whaa, you can make a crime of such simple things like meeting someone on a street. You can then give his name to everyone, put his name on home-made posters, call police, even attack as a first one, just because you are afraid. And security, especially German security, has always been very highly priced in Germany. In my opinion, it is not just SJWism, which does not really exist in Germany (at least in the sense of spontaneous activity and subculture) besides government mandated virtue signalling, but the expression of rather low German cultural traits.
I was a victim of such a law for a year, in spite of the fact that I am a disabled person, and despite that it was passed on perjury which I could prove (for this reason I finally got acquitted in the crminal court. But guess what? Immediately they tried to accuse me on the basis of another law. There is saying in Germany : If violence does not solve a problem, more violence will solve the problem. Wenn es geht nicht mit Gewalt, es geht mit mehr Gewalt.). On the account of great and agitated activity of my former German gilfriend, I was actually attacked few times and my ribs were broken. But neither police nor a prosecutor did care, everything was justified, and if it was not, that could be not proved too! There was a security video tape, but why look at the tape when we have such trustworthy German witnesses! No need. Hahaha , we Germans always win!
Somewhere very deeply there is a dangerous vibe in German culture, a vibe which murmurs with 'denounce' and resonates with 'kill', denounce & kill, denounce & kill.
I mean, a crazy woman can be found anywhere. But there is a problem when a crazy woman almost immediately resonates with crazy elements of culture. Those crazy elements of German culture are not really feminism- or SJW-based. 'Me too' has never really got off here.
Germany is still a culture of intimidation without real attempt to correct it. Remember: If violence does not solve a problem, more violence will solve the problem. Wenn es geht nicht mit Gewalt, es geht mit mehr Gewalt.
Even antidiscrimination law has to be forced upon Germany by EU, the law, which is, of course, a real joke here. Hochstaplerism.
It is a pity that Germans do not really appreciate freedom and broterhood but just always try to get upper hand against each other. This is a culture of hierarchy, something like Japan. The one who is higher is always right, and if you lose, you lose because apparently you deserved, so no one will cry after you, whatever happened. They will simply eat you. Ever heard about Arisierung? It was a redistribution of Jewish property among so called 'normal Germans'. It substantially changed my ideas about German complicity in Holocaust, because it was Arisierung that drived 'normal' Germans to denounce 'normal' Jews since they could get their property. Ever dreamed about this friseur shop on the corner?! Now it could be yours, just a small trip to Gestapo away. Disgusting. It is one thing when a regime organizes persecution, it is another when it is driven by your neighbours.... And, mostly they never gave back what they took in Arisierung.
Compassion is rooted in empathy, and Germany is not a compassionate land. Fair play is not really important - Hochstapler aka con-man is an important cultural concept here to which Thomas Mann devoted his last novel (Confessions of con-man Felix Krull), safely writing from Switzerland.
And it is very true that the accused would get nothing in compensation here. In Germany, to get even small compensation you must prove that someone either did something deliberately (vorsatzlich) or did not fullfil his legal duty (Pflicht). That essentially means that there is incentive in the system for false accusations, since you can never prove that someone said a lie deliberately AND in order to inflict a loss or harm upon you. Germany is always full of do-gooders who do harm.
And the obsession with duty transcends everything, ethics, law - as a good exemplification, just recently there was an article either in SZ or FAZ newspaper, discussing whether Von Stauffneberg did broke his oath, trying to take Hitler life in 1994. However German 'duties' are usually narrowly defined, there is no general doctrine of 'duty of care' here. If something is not clearly in law, it is not a duty, haha! There is perverse, hidden racism in refusing to assimilate such foreign concepts here, a sign that Germans still somehow consider 'the German way the best and only way', still being silently in contests with French and British cultures, as always they used to be. I once had a discussion with my old German landlord, who liked rambling about duty and Kant. I had to explain to him that Kant's notion of duty is rooted in the transcendental subject, not a current law on the books. I mean he took from Kant what he understood, and he understood what his culture learnt him.
Essentially all that means that there is no real recognition of personality and human rights (Personlichkeitenrechten) in Germany, nor mental anguish and humiliation, for example. Human righst are foreign concept from France here.
Human righst are not duties and thus do not really exist in German mentality. From this perspective, you could say the subjects of human righst do not really exist.
Neither Mollath nor Kachelmann, two recent victims of big justice scandals, got anything.
Moreover, no one is really concerned with them. No reparations for injustice in Germany. Cry for yourself in your pillow, loser. That is a message here.
The great cultural narration of seeking to amend injustice does not exist in Germany. Michael Kolhaas, a character of Kleist story who went such a way, is presented in a school narration as someone who exaggerated.
By the way, it is interesting story to read, much more than a recent film with Max Mikkelsen (pretty good on its own, too), since in the story actually almost every figure - even Martin Luther - admits that Kolhaas is right, but still nothing can be changed in his case. It is a deep story about cultural fatalism of Germany.
