Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
Connecticut bans conversion therapy.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SlickyBoy" data-source="post: 1116784" data-attributes="member: 8508"><p>As mentioned, the article didn't explain it very clearly, but this has to do with prohibiting therapists from conducting anything resembling "conversion therapy" on children. No idea where they draw the line on what constitutes conversion therapy or how it's expected to be policed. </p><p></p><p>On the subject of converting adults, Sigmund Freud himself did not deny it was possible, but he said (in response to a mother asking about whether it would work for her son), that it would depend upon two things - the age of the patient, and the desire of the patient to change. Hence, even he agreed a child is in a much better position to change and/or be influenced than a grown adult. </p><p></p><p>There are religious and secular groups out there who participate in this and though society at large - especially the gay community - does not respect their efforts and actively fights against them, there are probably a few success stories, though it's understandable we would never hear about that.</p><p></p><p>For lesbian woman switching around there's even more evidence that human sexuality is not immutable. Plenty of LUGs (Lesbians Until Graduation) leave college and go on to be more or less regular heterosexual (if oversexed, ruined and thousand cock stare afflicted) women later in life. I know it'd be great for Buzzfeed to announce the existence of a "gay gene" but it flat out does not exist. Even if it did, what would happen next would be the desire for parents everywhere to get their unborn child tested for the gene and aborted if it were found to have the propensity to be born a homosexual. Then what - would gays suddenly become pro life? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, the facts back up way more than that. For their population, there are far too many of them who willingly participate in child molesting - the Catholic Church scandal at its core was about a homosexual mafia moving around gay pedophiles through a network of sympathizers. They definitely do not want to be "equal" and just like everyone else - far from it. As the bill passed in CT demonstrates, they are constantly chewing at the edges of normy society in an effort to cut out exceptions and special treatments for themselves. The only one of note with a sense of reality is Milo Yiannopolis and look what they did to him. </p><p></p><p>If there is a lack of trust for the gay community that you sense on this forum, it's for a damned good reason. They are not our allies. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Banging sluts without a condom is foolish indeed, but HIV rates (as well as other STDs including Hepatitis) spread far worse and more rapidly among the gay community as a direct result of their stratospheric levels of promiscuity, even when they do use protection. </p><p></p><p>How many bathrooms, public parks and rest areas get raided by police because heterosexual people are meeting up there regularly for anonymous sex with random people from chat rooms? It never happens, of course. That's because heterosexual and homosexual communities and approaches to sex are utterly unalike even in these perverted times. </p><p></p><p>Throw in their latest campaign to be allowed to donate blood and you have a recipe for disaster, all because they want to strut their political stuff and see what they can get through browbeating impressionable white liberals. You know what? Fuck that - enough is enough. The blood supply is too risky to allow them to participate just because their feelings are hurt.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SlickyBoy, post: 1116784, member: 8508"] As mentioned, the article didn't explain it very clearly, but this has to do with prohibiting therapists from conducting anything resembling "conversion therapy" on children. No idea where they draw the line on what constitutes conversion therapy or how it's expected to be policed. On the subject of converting adults, Sigmund Freud himself did not deny it was possible, but he said (in response to a mother asking about whether it would work for her son), that it would depend upon two things - the age of the patient, and the desire of the patient to change. Hence, even he agreed a child is in a much better position to change and/or be influenced than a grown adult. There are religious and secular groups out there who participate in this and though society at large - especially the gay community - does not respect their efforts and actively fights against them, there are probably a few success stories, though it's understandable we would never hear about that. For lesbian woman switching around there's even more evidence that human sexuality is not immutable. Plenty of LUGs (Lesbians Until Graduation) leave college and go on to be more or less regular heterosexual (if oversexed, ruined and thousand cock stare afflicted) women later in life. I know it'd be great for Buzzfeed to announce the existence of a "gay gene" but it flat out does not exist. Even if it did, what would happen next would be the desire for parents everywhere to get their unborn child tested for the gene and aborted if it were found to have the propensity to be born a homosexual. Then what - would gays suddenly become pro life? Unfortunately, the facts back up way more than that. For their population, there are far too many of them who willingly participate in child molesting - the Catholic Church scandal at its core was about a homosexual mafia moving around gay pedophiles through a network of sympathizers. They definitely do not want to be "equal" and just like everyone else - far from it. As the bill passed in CT demonstrates, they are constantly chewing at the edges of normy society in an effort to cut out exceptions and special treatments for themselves. The only one of note with a sense of reality is Milo Yiannopolis and look what they did to him. If there is a lack of trust for the gay community that you sense on this forum, it's for a damned good reason. They are not our allies. Banging sluts without a condom is foolish indeed, but HIV rates (as well as other STDs including Hepatitis) spread far worse and more rapidly among the gay community as a direct result of their stratospheric levels of promiscuity, even when they do use protection. How many bathrooms, public parks and rest areas get raided by police because heterosexual people are meeting up there regularly for anonymous sex with random people from chat rooms? It never happens, of course. That's because heterosexual and homosexual communities and approaches to sex are utterly unalike even in these perverted times. Throw in their latest campaign to be allowed to donate blood and you have a recipe for disaster, all because they want to strut their political stuff and see what they can get through browbeating impressionable white liberals. You know what? Fuck that - enough is enough. The blood supply is too risky to allow them to participate just because their feelings are hurt. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
Connecticut bans conversion therapy.
Top
