Coronavirus Lounge thread

Were I one of those evil elites, I'd do this just to rub crap in peasants' faces ust to see if they'd offer any feeble resistance or just mindlessly go along not remembering the original "two weeks to flat the curve".

And if so, further embolden to view people as mindless, useless eaters
full-spectrum-domination-png.24728
 

areyouaweir

 
Banned
Catholic

I have a hard time believing things like this because the fact is, all of these things you mentioned in the last paragraph logically appeared due to social media. Initially when facebook was invented it was for students only, but soon after it became open to the public. Soon after that we had snapchat, instagram, tik tok, twitter, etc, and all of these platforms were created by the nerds of society. In return, the people who had time on their hands spent all of their waking hours becoming moderators and heavy users of these platforms, which over time began to sway opinion in a particular direction. Eventually these people became the majority on these platforms, and because only the dregs of society would spend such an unfathomable amount of time on them, one can reasonably infer that all of these LGBTQ agendas, social justice, etc, came from these dregs of society. Not only that but human psychology has been exploited so that the average pseudo intellectual supports these kinds of things because they have no other purpose in life.

Destroy social media tomorrow, and these degenerates will have no stories to share, no platform to regurgitate their opinions online, and nobody to support them. The only reason we are seeing a decline in society is because social media has given a totalitarian platform to degenerates to force their agenda upon others.

I don't believe the "elites" facilitated this, not one bit. Sure, it is advantageous to them, but I don't think anybody even remotely at the top fathomed that drag queens would become a thing. The only interference I can think of that is legitimate is ideological subversion which Yuri Bezmenov mentioned, and George Soros's support in the riots last year.
 

Papaya

Peacock
Gold Member
I have a hard time believing things like this because the fact is, all of these things you mentioned in the last paragraph logically appeared due to social media. Initially when facebook was invented it was for students only, but soon after it became open to the public. Soon after that we had snapchat, instagram, tik tok, twitter, etc, and all of these platforms were created by the nerds of society. In return, the people who had time on their hands spent all of their waking hours becoming moderators and heavy users of these platforms, which over time began to sway opinion in a particular direction. Eventually these people became the majority on these platforms, and because only the dregs of society would spend such an unfathomable amount of time on them, one can reasonably infer that all of these LGBTQ agendas, social justice, etc, came from these dregs of society. Not only that but human psychology has been exploited so that the average pseudo intellectual supports these kinds of things because they have no other purpose in life.

Destroy social media tomorrow, and these degenerates will have no stories to share, no platform to regurgitate their opinions online, and nobody to support them. The only reason we are seeing a decline in society is because social media has given a totalitarian platform to degenerates to force their agenda upon others.

I don't believe the "elites" facilitated this, not one bit. Sure, it is advantageous to them, but I don't think anybody even remotely at the top fathomed that drag queens would become a thing. The only interference I can think of that is legitimate is ideological subversion which Yuri Bezmenov mentioned, and George Soros's support in the riots last year.
Theres no doubt that the advent of internet and social media have greatly expanded and enhanced western cultures demise. But dont think for a minute that the subversion agenda started after. Its been going on for centuries with a n accelerated pace for at least last 60 -70 years. Movies and then TV were corrupted long before Al Gore invented the internet
 

areyouaweir

 
Banned
Catholic
Theres no doubt that the advent of internet and social media have greatly expanded and enhanced western cultures demise. But dont think for a minute that the subversion agenda started after. Its been going on for centuries with a n accelerated pace for at least last 60 -70 years. Movies and then TV were corrupted long before Al Gore invented the internet

I don't disagree, but if you look at what things were like just 10 years ago, it was a complete 180 to where we're at now. I'm a firm believer that if social media were not around, we wouldn't hear many of the degenerate voices that made it to the mainstream. There wouldn't be a such thing as clown world, not for a long, long time. Clown world incidents would be few and far in between. Sure, communist influence was there prior to social media, but it was moving very, very slowly. Yuri had mentioned that it takes generations to truly subvert a nation, and it's happened all in the span of 10 years. social media accelerated it way too much.
 

the high

Kingfisher
Other Christian
I don't disagree, but if you look at what things were like just 10 years ago, it was a complete 180 to where we're at now. I'm a firm believer that if social media were not around, we wouldn't hear many of the degenerate voices that made it to the mainstream. There wouldn't be a such thing as clown world, not for a long, long time. Clown world incidents would be few and far in between. Sure, communist influence was there prior to social media, but it was moving very, very slowly. Yuri had mentioned that it takes generations to truly subvert a nation, and it's happened all in the span of 10 years. social media accelerated it way too much.
Yuri said 15-20 years or one generation, so 10 years isn't far off from that.
 

areyouaweir

 
Banned
Catholic
Yuri said 15-20 years or one generation, so 10 years isn't far off from that.

Well, let me put it this way:

Before social media, could you imagine someone openly claiming that gender is a social construct, and that crossdressing was normal? In my opinion, if someone tried to push that narrative pre social media, they probably would've been beaten and or sent to a mental institution. I don't think anyone would even have the courage to come out and say something like that back then.

Or better yet, can you imagine someone talking openly about white supremacy? Reparations for black people?

This stuff is only enabled by social media, it would've taken much, much longer to gain any traction at all without it.

It's insidious because people have always looked towards corporations and media to gain a basis for normalcy, but when every institution slowly starts to change what's normal, people's idea of normal also changes. Few people even realize the usage statistics of a site like Twatter, something like 80% of tweets are from 10% of the users, and most of the tweets are from women. This is public info too, not something hidden. Not to mention the vast amounts of bots that post the same propaganda from different accounts. People's minds have been dumbed down to not be able to critically think about this stuff.

We could agree to disagree, but I just don't see us being where we are now without social media's help to move things along.
 

the high

Kingfisher
Other Christian
I agree with you, I was just being the "well akshually" guy when I saw you reference Yuri as I had just watched that video again recently.
 

LeoniusD

Pelican
Gnostic or New Age
Spot on.

They won as soon as they attained control of the monetary system and were able to infiltrate virtually all Masonic lodges and secret societies.

The latter being easily attainable once you had sufficient funds and had countries and kings borrowing money from you at usury.

Anything from then was a constant march down an agenda. They had been in charge for 100+ years before anyone of you were ever born.

We are now entering into what they called 50 years ago the Century of Change. This century is when everything shall finally be manifested - all the final changes they planned to implement more than a century ago.

+ depopulation - rapid enough as to not let them lose control
+ total control over every monetary transaction
+ elimination of most small and medium businesses - this coincides well with depopulation and agenda change as the peasants will only afford the basic services that they offer to them
+ restriction of peasant resource consumption - insect and plant protein instead of meat and dairy, little controlled consumption on general, little travel
+ accelerated peasant dumbing down and illness proliferation - this being done not only with the frequent vaccines, but also the coming food changes - the plant- and insect foods, your upcycled trash food will let you die much sooner
+ social changes coming with the increased promotion of homosexuality, transgenderism, pedophilia, etc. - anything frankly is fine including ritual cannibalism so long as there is no nuclear family, women are elevated in the unnatural position above the man which only makes them lash out in a legion of angry Karens, and yes - a deliberate mixing of the races is on the agenda as well - best if in the future only they have an IQ well above 110 and are 2 feet taller and have white skin - the rest of the peasants will appear as a different species, darker, smaller and much dumber - unable to ever rebel

Now - that is the plan, I don't think that they will be able to manifest their eternal Reich, but they will certainly give their best try and might create very very dark times for the coming decades on earth. Humanity will prevail however and freedom will return some day. At worst most will live shorter more miserable lives for some time.

And looking at most people I say that they willingly walk into the gulag clapping. Hope that future generations can learn from that.
 

Gimlet

Kingfisher
Well, let me put it this way:

Before social media, could you imagine someone openly claiming that gender is a social construct, and that crossdressing was normal? In my opinion, if someone tried to push that narrative pre social media, they probably would've been beaten and or sent to a mental institution. I don't think anyone would even have the courage to come out and say something like that back then.

The award winning film Dog Day Afternoon in which Al Pacino robs a bank to get money to help his homosexual lover get a sex change operation came out in 1975.

The Jeffersons had a trannie story line in 1977.

In the TV Show Soap, Billy Crystal was homosexual who want a sex change. Also 1977.

Tootsie came out in the early 80s.

So did The World According to Garp, in which John Lithgow was a tranny retired football player.

I am of the Gen X age. This crap started way before social media. Social media turbo charged it, yes. But the foundation was already there. I saw the long march, but as a child I didn't recognize it. Now I do. Our society was softened up to this degeneracy way before social media.
 
Last edited:

Viktor Zeegelaar

Hummingbird
Orthodox Inquirer
Good observation, though I do think our enemy (Satan) has a big interest in victory over us. Moreover, we cannot stop it at the global level, but we can stop it in our personal lives to a large extend by avoiding MSM, pornography, secular lifestyle. So we're not 100% free from it but we can limit it down to a small degree.
 

Viktor Zeegelaar

Hummingbird
Orthodox Inquirer
I have a hard time believing things like this because the fact is, all of these things you mentioned in the last paragraph logically appeared due to social media. Initially when facebook was invented it was for students only, but soon after it became open to the public. Soon after that we had snapchat, instagram, tik tok, twitter, etc, and all of these platforms were created by the nerds of society. In return, the people who had time on their hands spent all of their waking hours becoming moderators and heavy users of these platforms, which over time began to sway opinion in a particular direction. Eventually these people became the majority on these platforms, and because only the dregs of society would spend such an unfathomable amount of time on them, one can reasonably infer that all of these LGBTQ agendas, social justice, etc, came from these dregs of society. Not only that but human psychology has been exploited so that the average pseudo intellectual supports these kinds of things because they have no other purpose in life.

Destroy social media tomorrow, and these degenerates will have no stories to share, no platform to regurgitate their opinions online, and nobody to support them. The only reason we are seeing a decline in society is because social media has given a totalitarian platform to degenerates to force their agenda upon others.

I don't believe the "elites" facilitated this, not one bit. Sure, it is advantageous to them, but I don't think anybody even remotely at the top fathomed that drag queens would become a thing. The only interference I can think of that is legitimate is ideological subversion which Yuri Bezmenov mentioned, and George Soros's support in the riots last year.
Every facet of society since the staged freedom revolutions since the 60s has been carefully constructed. The dr Day tapes in the 60s already foretold that gender was going to disappear, for they work towards a non gender world in order to control procreation in labs etc (first confuse with the gays, now merge with the trannies). Why don't you believe this? Is that a prideful statement out of fear of the unknown? Or have you done your research? I'd recommend you to do some more research on the scale of dominance the elite has. And that will take time, don't expect it to land in a week but 1-1.5 year and you should be able to see 99% of the strings in the web. It's pretty daunting to realize this, that even the food you eat has been discussed at a top level in order to weaken you, but when you understand that society has set out to destroy you, you will find greater freedom than you ever had.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member

The best, most effective type of propaganda is one that packages a powerful truth to plant a smaller element of indoctrination onto the target audience. That is the actual goal of pieces like the one above, it is a subtle misdirection that plays into the zio-nationalist Muslim spell, obfuscating the tribal nature of the foreign element occupying the West and substituting for it an islamic bogeyman in the form of a long-gone empire that was active on the southeastern edge of Europe two centuries ago.

This subtle subterfuge is exactly the same that has been used in the Yuri Bezmenov story, where the target audience is led to believe that a Soviet/Russian secret propaganda arm was the main agent in the demoralization of the West, recycling the old obsolete Cold War theme, which resonates with American Boomers. These Boomers are led to believe that the US and the West have been penetrated by Russian agents, when in fact those cultural change agents are not Russian at all. This also serves to vilify Russia and create a new cold war popular mindset against Russia.

This theme and the right-left dialectic has been particularly effective in keeping much of the American right (especially older "conservatives") in the zionist plantation, into which they've invested billions (Fox, Breitbart, Shapiro and the rest of Con Inc).

Eventually the smarter (and usually younger) elements of the right go on to discover the real nature of the demoralization operation by studying the real nature of the Frankfurt School and the tribal aspect of the people financing and pushing that agenda.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
The award winning film Dog Day Afternoon in which Al Pacino robs a bank to get money to help his homosexual lover get a sex change operation came out in 1975.

The Jeffersons had a trannie story line in 1977.

In the TV Show Soap, Billy Crystal was homosexual who want a sex change. Also 1977.

Tootsie came out in the early 80s.

So did The World According to Garp, in which John Lithgow was a tranny retired football player.

I am of the Gen X age. This crap started way before social media. Social media turbo charged it, yes. But the foundation was already there. I saw the long march, but as a child I didn't recognize it. Now I do. Our society was softened up to this degeneracy way before social media.

Well said.

In fact the greatest cultural leap towards degeneracy occurred in the 1960s-70s, priming the Boomer generation and stripping them from the virtues of their cultural heritage and faith.

The main reason social media has been effective the last decade is because its target audience has already been primed, as atomized individuals with weak family structures living in a post-Christian society, they are prone to be programmed.
 

ginsu

Kingfisher
Agnostic
I have a hard time believing things like this because the fact is, all of these things you mentioned in the last paragraph logically appeared due to social media. Initially when facebook was invented it was for students only, but soon after it became open to the public. Soon after that we had snapchat, instagram, tik tok, twitter, etc, and all of these platforms were created by the nerds of society. In return, the people who had time on their hands spent all of their waking hours becoming moderators and heavy users of these platforms, which over time began to sway opinion in a particular direction. Eventually these people became the majority on these platforms, and because only the dregs of society would spend such an unfathomable amount of time on them, one can reasonably infer that all of these LGBTQ agendas, social justice, etc, came from these dregs of society. Not only that but human psychology has been exploited so that the average pseudo intellectual supports these kinds of things because they have no other purpose in life.

Destroy social media tomorrow, and these degenerates will have no stories to share, no platform to regurgitate their opinions online, and nobody to support them. The only reason we are seeing a decline in society is because social media has given a totalitarian platform to degenerates to force their agenda upon others.

I don't believe the "elites" facilitated this, not one bit. Sure, it is advantageous to them, but I don't think anybody even remotely at the top fathomed that drag queens would become a thing. The only interference I can think of that is legitimate is ideological subversion which Yuri Bezmenov mentioned, and George Soros's support in the riots last year.

To disregard everything that happened which has led us up to this point and to absolve the elite of any responsibility in it is very suspect.

@911 said '' The best, most effective type of propaganda is one that packages a powerful truth to plant a smaller element of indoctrination onto the target audience. ''

Thats what areyouaweir ( yes we are aware of you ) is trying to do by getting everyone to agree that social media has put the decline of society on steroids. Obviously it did, but its not the main driver. At the same time he slips in that the elite are unaware and it all happened unintentionally. And dismisses that the period from 1950 to 2010 was intentionally used by the elite to lay the groundwork for everything.

hes most likely a troll / plant
 
Last edited:

Belgrano

Ostrich
Gold Member
The best, most effective type of propaganda is one that packages a powerful truth to plant a smaller element of indoctrination onto the target audience. That is the actual goal of pieces like the one above, it is a subtle misdirection that plays into the zio-nationalist Muslim spell, obfuscating the tribal nature of the foreign element occupying the West and substituting for it an islamic bogeyman in the form of a long-gone empire that was active on the southeastern edge of Europe two centuries ago.

Or, you know, maybe it's just a good historical example to illustrate the point? Nobody except you even brought up Islam. By the way, if you are Central or Eastern or Southern European, Islam was and is not a "bogeyman" but a very real threat and your direct ancestors have spent a millennium fighting endless wars to defend themselves against the oh-so-irrelevant "long-gone empire", thereby protecting Christianity and preserving their culture and civilization.

You keep telling us to fight Sauron and ignore the orcs. I say: Why not both?

I've noticed a consistent pattern of you trying to steer the conversation away from Islam whenever it's brought up. Even in a case like this, where nobody brought up Islam, you still go into damage control mode and jump in to drop some subtle apologetics. Quite bemusing, actually. I have to wonder what your motivation is though. Are you a Muslim?
 
Last edited:

911

Peacock
Gold Member
Or, you know, maybe it's just a good historical example to illustrate the point? Nobody except you even brought up Islam. By the way, if you are Central or Eastern or Southern European, Islam was and is not a "bogeyman" but a very real threat and your direct ancestors have spent a millennium fighting endless wars to defend themselves against the oh-so-irrelevant "long-gone empire", thereby protecting Christianity and preserving their culture and civilization.

You keep telling us to fight Sauron and ignore the orcs. I say: Why not both?

I've noticed a consistent pattern of you trying to steer the conversation away from Islam whenever it's brought up. Even in a case like this, where nobody brought up Islam, you still go into damage control mode and jump in to drop some subtle apologetics. Quite bemusing, actually. I have to wonder what your motivation is though. Are you a Muslim?

I wasn't the one bringing out islam here, it was brought out as the main feature in the long 4Chan post quoted above. I seriously doubt that the author's choice of digging out a marginal (and potentially dubious) historic vignette from the 17th or 18th century Ottoman rule to illustrate his point was really random, he could have chosen from a plethora of examples of more current and relevant events to make his point, for example the widespread use of child prostitution in the Weimar Republic, or the sexualization of children in the Bela (Kohn) Kun's Hungary.

These western societies were orders of magnitude more degenerate than the Ottomans ever were, their use here would have been far more relevant than an obscure phenomenon from Ottoman times, not just because the dynamics of humiliation thorough degeneracy aimed at children the same as today's, but also because these events took place in western cities, and the actors behind them are actually the same. And the fact that the 4Chan author consciously avoids naming the architects of this degeneracy in a long post is either a sign of ignorance, of cowardice or of deliberate obfuscation.

your direct ancestors have spent a millennium fighting endless wars to defend themselves against the oh-so-irrelevant "long-gone empire", thereby protecting Christianity and preserving their culture and civilization.

The battle against Islam was settled 14 centuries ago by my French Catholic ancestors at Poitiers. Interestingly enough, my French Catholic ancestors were actually allied with the Ottomans for much of the Renaissance and beyond. Without that alliance France might have been completely overrun by the Habsburgs/Anglos, and France might not even have existed today as a nation-state.

As well, it was the fall of the Ottoman Empire (which was as much a target of the globalist architects of WW1 as the three Christian empires of Austria-Hungary, Russia and Germany) that paved the way to the genocide of Christians in Asia Minor and the middle east and the greater Israel project. The Muslim Ottomans were replaced by Domneh freemasons, who went on to massacre millions of Armenians, Greeks and Assyrian Christians.

What I am calling out here is Islam being presented as the enemy to western right-leaning audiences in a conscious effort to hide the cultural nature of the architects of the degeneracy plaguing the West. Islam in Europe is a consequence, and only a side feature of the Kalergist European great replacement project, which has been constantly used as a misdirection, this is what I've described as the Muslim Spell. Where the fixation on Islam does become a problem is when it diverts nationalists from the real actors behind the destruction of the West, who are willfully amplifying the antagonism towards Islam as they keep the mass migration floodgates open, in a recreation of the Moorish invasion of Spain. The damage would be the same if they brought in 10 million muslim Maghrebans or 10 million Congolese into western Europe.

In any case, the Muslim threat narrative is already receding today, and is now being overtaken by the ChiCom and Russian threat, with the Chinese now being portrayed as Muslim genociders, and their Muslims as victims we need to save, similarly to the narrative from the 1990s vilifying the Serbs. The Chinese Threat is directed mainly at a rght-leaning public, while the Russian Threat is directed at a left-leaning public, although older Boomers are also easily swayed, and the use of the Bezmenov lecture is a prime tool for that manipulation.
 
Top