I've been very impressed by Neil Oliver. He's been outspoken throughout, knowing full well it will cost him his lucrative TV career.Important message!
'[Vaccine passports] will not exclude me from anywhere I want to be... anywhere demanding such an abomination from any citizen is nowhere I would enjoy being'www.gbnews.uk
Be careful. It is, most probably, a set up. Once an Activist intelligence asset, always an intelligence asset or a corpse. If it gets a lot of media coverage, you know its a plant, either to promote Cv or to gain blm support from a previous unfriendly portion of the populace.Yeah, but it'll be nice to watch the Left dealing with one of the monsters they created.
And then these people can not work without having their buildings. So construction workers should start to demolish what they have already built?Sorry if this sounds harsh, but together with the army, doctors/nurses and the police, professions like statisticians, software engineers, IT specialists, programmers, you all have to rethink your role in the enabling of the technocratic world order.
Without the smart phones the jab passport won't work. The blockchain money is also a part of the problem as it paves the way for a centralised digital currency. The pharmaceutical technology all involves plenty of computer workers and developers. The latest jab itself would not have been developed if there were not enough willing computer specialists to develop it.
Behind all these innovation there's an army of software developers/programmers, etc.
I deal with this also. I have my justifications and "lines in the sand." We'll find out if our justifications were legitimate eventually.And then these people can not work without having their buildings. So construction workers should start to demolish what they have already built?
If they had no electricity they could not work. If they could not fly at the first place they could not have built the Internet. If they did not have cars then the industry could not have been built so big. Without railroads globalism would be impossible. I can go on endless.
Is there any profession that does not somehow enable globalism? At which point are we not to be blamed?
I have read the Unabomber manifesto a few years earlier and maybe he is right about technical development. But how should we block that? If we do not take part in building these things then the people who take part will have more children and just out breed us. Then our resistance was futile.
I don't really see how it would be possible to be a luddit and slow the progression of technical development without persuading everyone else to join the movement. Will you be better off if I don't program those machines that I program now?
Is it impossible to use technology in an ethical way?
How do you define the circle of people who are responsible for what we have now? How do you decide whether someone is responsible or not?
I don't know the answers. I have more question than answers. I want to do the right thing but I am not sure what that is.