They don't.How do the tests tell a difference between normal covid, delta, and omnicron?
Is “normal covid” confirmed to have been isolated in the first place?T
I own a decent size company in the building trades and I asked this very question of the occupational care provider that I use. For context it is a small independent provider and I pay them ~2k month. This was a couple weeks into the delta scam. Maybe things have changed since then.
Klaus tells us in the Great Reset that entertainment flights are not of the future. Travel will be very limited. If people are moving they're more difficult to control compared than they're in the same area all the time.Travel bans are going up like clockwork.
So this explains why they're pushing so hard to normalize this vaccinating: if it's normal and fashionable, people will feel that they choose for it themselves, hence it will be near to impossible to get out of it and change their ways as when someone has made a choice feeling they did it themselves ego and pride will come in the way of turning that decision around. Brilliant play. Propaganda in Bernays' view by the way is just the propagation of an idea or product, so not necessarily evil, although it can very easily be used and usually is to convey products or ideas that do damage to people, although not always.
Wow - my apologies then. Certainly had me fooled! Won't post unless I am 100% certain. No idea why someone would do this, smh. Shame I cannot edit/delete post after 1 hour.
The lack of consistency in the nomenclature is an indication of the unscientific nature of it.
If you are going to use Greek letters, then it would make sense to go through the Greek alphabet, with each subsequent variant being the next letter in the alphabet. That is what someone logical and scientific would do.
The fact that they went from 'delta' to 'omicron' makes no sense and has no justification whatsoever, other than the fact that some PR person probably suggested that Greek letters weren't scary enough.
It’s becoming increasingly obvious that this entire two-year global anti-virus campaign has been a charade. Whatever the true objective was, neither saving lives nor health care was actually the purpose. Which reminds us, once again, that the one thing we can be absolutely certain is not true is whatever the official story being pushed by the government-media complex is.This “variant” has been found all over the world already. Therefore its already everywhere. Locking down travel after it is already in your nation is stupid and does nothing. The variant is either going to become dominant or it will not. You cannot alter that course once it gets to you — and no matter where you are it already has.
This “variant” has no evidence of being more deadly; it may in fact be less-so. Indeed that is the natural mutational pattern coronaviruses follow over time. There is no evidence in the form, for example, of higher hospital admissions, ICU utilization and death in those in which this variant has been detected. In other words thus far all the scaremongering has been based on….. exactly nothing as there are no facts currently in evidence to support such fear.
The vaccines clearly do not work. International travel has been vaccinated-only everywhere for quite some time. So the person(s) who brought the virus into your nation with this “variant” were vaccinated. The market, of course, responded to this news by spiking the vaccine companies, specifically Moderna. You have to wonder what sort of stupidity would drive someone to consider a firm that has one product which clearly did not work a “buy” in a situation like this. Mass psychosis is the only reasonable explanation.
Lockdowns and constraints clearly do not work either. The virus mutated because that’s what viruses do, and specifically coronaviruses do this all the time. It’s common. Further, vaccinating into an outbreak promotes vaccine-resistant strains because that’s just how natural selection works. You want the opposite but you can’t get there from here by vaccinating people while an outbreak is going on so the better option is to focus on early treatments and even prophylaxis which does not place immune pressure on the virus to evade your jabs.
Meanwhile the evidence continues to mount that prior infection confers better resistance than vaccines. Perfect immunity? No. But much better immunity and, to three nines, perfect protection against critical illness and death.
There were no cases of critical disease at reinfection and 28 cases at primary infection (Table S3), for an odds ratio of 0.00 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.64). There were no cases of death from Covid-19 at reinfection and 7 cases at primary infection resulting in an odds ratio of 0.00…
So which do you prefer, since while the jabs do appear to provide some protection it wanes and it certainly does not prevent 100% of the severe and fatal outcomes.
Never mind the jab side effect profiles, which are quite dangerous, the evidence is mounting that the intermediate and long-term dangers are very significant and, in addition, there is mounting evidence that if you get jabbed and then are infected, and you will get infected, you are likely to not build “N” protein recognition so you can get infected again and again until you get the bad case that screws you. This is due to a well-recognized phenomena called “OAS” (“Original Antigenic Sin”) and is directly caused by the vaccines as they “train” your body to produce “S” antibodies, which is all they contain coding for and not “N” protein antibodies which are critical as the virus cannot mutate in that part to any material degree and remain a viable virus.
On the other hand the evidence is that beating the disease without a jab once means you have durable protection against critical and fatal outcomes on an extremely reliable basis including potential mutations since the “N” protein does not and cannot undergo substantial change.
The latter, by the way, is the pattern for every serious viral disease outbreak through history.
Spot on. This is what a few writers like Jon Rappoport, Gary D. Barnett, Andrew Anglin insisted all along: nothing happened but a rebranding of the flu. Unfortunately, Denninger is like the majority of resisters: he pushes back against the lies but still holds to the view that covid is real. He talks about “natural mutation patterns” and herd immunity and so on. Martin Armstrong of Armstrong Economics is another one like this. He does excellent work about the economic motives behind the scam but still insists there is a real virus and has written pieces criticizing those who deny its existence.Good luck winning the war against the globalists with an army that's THIS confused. The truth is one million times more simple: nothing happened. And if everyone switched off their screens, nobody would think that anything happened.