They conveniently overlook that investigations into the efficacy of the VAERS system revealed years ago that the system is hopelessly flawed and needs a complete overhaul, and only a miniscule fraction of adverse events/deaths ever get logged into the system. It’s believed you have to multiply by 100 to get an estimate of the true numbers."
Funny that they use numbers when it suits them, but like to forget numbers like "99.9% survival rate"
- "So far, 484 cases have been reported out of 90.6 million doses, which means the risk occurs in 0.000534% of young adults"
It’s not 484 cases. It’s 484 times 100, most likely (it’s the PCR test problem in reverse - whereas the PCR generates unreal, illusory “asymptomatic” cases right and left, the VAERS system fails to record real cases of harm right and left).
Also, cardiac inflammation is only one type of side effect. What about all the other types of health hazards being reported everywhere? Multiply all those by 100 as well.
Also, how do we even know it’s 90 million doses? The true dosage might be much lower, they could be lying about that like they lied about everything from the start.
And remember, these investigations have nothing to do with COVID. The massive failings of the VAERS and all similar systems were being studied and these findings reported years before the supposed “pandemic.” The “multiply by 100” claim isn’t coming from someone fed up with lockdowns or fighting against mandatory Vaxxing or anything like that.