Coronavirus vaccine thread

droughtmeat

Kingfisher
Catholic
You can't make this stuff up:

Plus this still doesn't help the pro vacks movement. If he died of covid, why did he get the gates juice in the first place? His death would have been worse without the juice? And how come it had an impact on him at this point where everyone has acquired some form of immunity?
 

Papaya

Peacock
Gold Member

GuitarVH

Ostrich
Orthodox Inquirer
So the virus is immune to the “vaccine“ and the “vaccine“ does not make the person immune to the virus...Im with Slowpoke. We are gonna need a bigger clown

This one is pretty big.


Dancing Clown  Clown stock vector
 

GuitarVH

Ostrich
Orthodox Inquirer

What Is in the So-called COVID-19 “Vaccines”?​

Part 1: Evidence of a Global Crime Against Humanity​




Abstract

Between July 2021 and August 2022, evidence of undisclosed ingredients in the COVID-19 “vaccines” was published by at least 26 researchers/research teams in 16 different countries across five continents using spectroscopic and microscopic analysis. Despite operating largely independently of one another, their findings are remarkably similar and highlight the clear and present danger that the world’s population has been lied to regarding the contents of the COVID-19 “vaccines”. This raises grave questions about the true purpose of the dangerous experimental injections that have so far been shot into 5.33 billion people (over two thirds of the human race), including children, apparently without their informed consent regarding the contents. Surprise findings include sharp-edged geometric structures, fibrous or tube-like structures, crystalline formations, “microbubbles”, and possible self-assembling nanotechnology. The blood of people who have received one or more COVID-19 “vaccines” appears, in case after case, to contain foreign bodies and to be seriously degraded, with red blood cells typically in Rouleaux formation. Taken together, these 26 studies make a powerful case for the full force of scientific investigation to be brought to bear on the COVID-19 “vaccine” contents. If the findings of these 26 studies are confirmed, then the political implications are nothing short of revolutionary: a global crime against humanity has been committed, in which every government, every regulator, every establishment media organization, and all the professions have been complicit.
 

Sisyphus

Kingfisher
Other Christian
My apologies if this has been posted already but I couldn't find it through the search.

There's a lot packed into this short video (under 7 minutes):


The supposed inventor of the Pfizer-BioNTech poison injection, Dr. Ugur Sahin is asked by a Deutsche Welt reporter why he himself hasn't received the poison. The answer might be amusing were it no so disturbing. In a manner consistent with someone suffering from a brain injury (specifically to Broca's area), the doctor panics before he stutters, stammers, and squirms his way through a bizarre and entirely unintelligible word salad whose main point seems to be that for some reason it's illegal for him to receive the poison along with some other secondary points.

When asked to clarify the gibberish he has just spouted, he launches into a second iteration of the explanation, mostly rehashing the previously provided explanations with an even greater degree of verbal bumbling reminiscent of Porky Pig. It's my understanding that DW is German MSM so it wasn't like a Project Veritas reporter who confronted him.

That's not all. After this, we learn that the "fact checkers" have declared that it is in fact misinformation to say that the doctor has not received the injection even though we just heard him say that he hadn't. We also learn that Reuters, whose connections with Pfizer are well documented but not mentioned by the anchor, was responsible with this totally inaccurate piece of fact checking and is in fact F-book's preferred fact checking entity. We can see for ourselves that people are more likely to believe what someone who declares themselves to be a fact checker tells them rather than what they can plainly observe with their senses. If fact checkers said the sky was green, people would accept it. We knew this already, but this is a salient demonstration which presents the undeniable reality of the situation. There is further discussion of the pitiful credentials of Snopes - one questionable item is that the wife of the CEO is described as a high class escort but appears to be porcine and leathery in appearance.

Earlier I referred to the doctor as the supposed inventor of the pharmaceutical poison, because the video discusses the absurd official story which I now realize to be a standard trope. The claim is that the doctor who can't put a coherent sentence together invented the injection in a single weekend on his computer and we are also shown the official claim that the Moderna poison was similarly invented in 2 hours. This might not prove much in isolation except that I recently heard that the supposed inventor of the most well known anti-social media platform claims to have written hundreds of thousands of lines of code during finals week at Harvard, a ludicrous claim especially since we know that it in fact was a DARPA project developed long before the autistic individual in question is supposed to have invented it.

Watching this video, I realized that this idea of geniuses inventing these products in a burst of inspiration accomplishes several things among the gullible masses. For one, it deflects attention from the fact that these things were developed in secret over many years by shady and nefarious actors. Secondly, for some reason it gives people the idea that because of the way in which they were created, these products are superior. People are so amazed that they don't stop to consider the implications of receiving a medical treatment thrown together with no planning even though the scenario is in no way believable. I'm sure there are other examples.
 

Nordwand

Pelican
Other Christian
After a good day at work on Monday, normal service was resumed, with a jolt, yesterday. A friend of mine, who should know better, showed me the sticker that he'd been given when he had number 4 and when he started talking, another guy nearby chimed in as well. Speaking to my co-conspirator - in - chief later in the morning, it appears that they're not the only ones.

Here's a vintage performance by Birmingham band Magnum:

 

Papaya

Peacock
Gold Member
My apologies if this has been posted already but I couldn't find it through the search.

There's a lot packed into this short video (under 7 minutes):


The supposed inventor of the Pfizer-BioNTech poison injection, Dr. Ugur Sahin is asked by a Deutsche Welt reporter why he himself hasn't received the poison. The answer might be amusing were it no so disturbing. In a manner consistent with someone suffering from a brain injury (specifically to Broca's area), the doctor panics before he stutters, stammers, and squirms his way through a bizarre and entirely unintelligible word salad whose main point seems to be that for some reason it's illegal for him to receive the poison along with some other secondary points.

When asked to clarify the gibberish he has just spouted, he launches into a second iteration of the explanation, mostly rehashing the previously provided explanations with an even greater degree of verbal bumbling reminiscent of Porky Pig. It's my understanding that DW is German MSM so it wasn't like a Project Veritas reporter who confronted him.

That's not all. After this, we learn that the "fact checkers" have declared that it is in fact misinformation to say that the doctor has not received the injection even though we just heard him say that he hadn't. We also learn that Reuters, whose connections with Pfizer are well documented but not mentioned by the anchor, was responsible with this totally inaccurate piece of fact checking and is in fact F-book's preferred fact checking entity. We can see for ourselves that people are more likely to believe what someone who declares themselves to be a fact checker tells them rather than what they can plainly observe with their senses. If fact checkers said the sky was green, people would accept it. We knew this already, but this is a salient demonstration which presents the undeniable reality of the situation. There is further discussion of the pitiful credentials of Snopes - one questionable item is that the wife of the CEO is described as a high class escort but appears to be porcine and leathery in appearance.

Earlier I referred to the doctor as the supposed inventor of the pharmaceutical poison, because the video discusses the absurd official story which I now realize to be a standard trope. The claim is that the doctor who can't put a coherent sentence together invented the injection in a single weekend on his computer and we are also shown the official claim that the Moderna poison was similarly invented in 2 hours. This might not prove much in isolation except that I recently heard that the supposed inventor of the most well known anti-social media platform claims to have written hundreds of thousands of lines of code during finals week at Harvard, a ludicrous claim especially since we know that it in fact was a DARPA project developed long before the autistic individual in question is supposed to have invented it.

Watching this video, I realized that this idea of geniuses inventing these products in a burst of inspiration accomplishes several things among the gullible masses. For one, it deflects attention from the fact that these things were developed in secret over many years by shady and nefarious actors. Secondly, for some reason it gives people the idea that because of the way in which they were created, these products are superior. People are so amazed that they don't stop to consider the implications of receiving a medical treatment thrown together with no planning even though the scenario is in no way believable. I'm sure there are other examples.

Good point. Early on in the toxxine roll outs I was having a discussion with a friend of mine, his GF and her brother. The brother was in from out of town visiting. I had just gone through the 18 Reason I Wont Be Getting Vaccinated and his response was: "I'm just grateful to be living in a world where modern science can come up with such a miracle drug so quickly. I think its amazing"

20201013_ghosts_clown_1000x700.png



The perpetrators really have exploited the social trust thats been built up over thousands of years of civilization. Who would believe that people you dont know and have never maligned in anyway could have enough antipathy towards billions to want you sterile and or dead
 

Grigori

 
Banned
Other Christian
The perpetrators really have exploited the social trust thats been built up over thousands of years of civilization. Who would believe that people you dont know and have never maligned in anyway could have enough antipathy towards billions to want you sterile and or dead
You're right, but you're only half of the way there. I believe that social trust is underrated. Look at the animals, they're all killing and eating each other. So too society is built upon a predator prey relationship. People who don't understand this simple truth, get eaten by the predators. In biology, there are animals who get turned into prey. So the people who took the injections have been turned into societal prey. The animals that didn't get turned into prey get to pass on their genes to the next generation. It's called social darwinism. You don't know the predators and have never maligned in anyway, but they're out to get you, because that's the definition of a predator. Who would believe that? It's self evident.

I would believe that the red pill crowd here knows about alpha and beta, animal psychology applied to humans. Well humans are just highly evolved animals. It means that humans, although posessing intellect, also have many animalistic qualities. And the predators use their intellect to more efficiently hunt the prey. If you're mentally soft, weak, and naive, then you become a pet animal. Pet animals don't last long in the wild before they get eaten up by someone because they're so docile. I've never believed the doctors, scientists, journalists, billionaires, and politicians. They're just predators, they're just out to get you. So what happened over the last two years is honestly not that surprizing.
 

Papaya

Peacock
Gold Member
You're right, but you're only half of the way there. I believe that social trust is underrated. Look at the animals, they're all killing and eating each other. So too society is built upon a predator prey relationship. People who don't understand this simple truth, get eaten by the predators. In biology, there are animals who get turned into prey. So the people who took the injections have been turned into societal prey. The animals that didn't get turned into prey get to pass on their genes to the next generation. It's called social darwinism. You don't know the predators and have never maligned in anyway, but they're out to get you, because that's the definition of a predator. Who would believe that? It's self evident.

I would believe that the red pill crowd here knows about alpha and beta, animal psychology applied to humans. Well humans are just highly evolved animals. It means that humans, although posessing intellect, also have many animalistic qualities. And the predators use their intellect to more efficiently hunt the prey. If you're mentally soft, weak, and naive, then you become a pet animal. Pet animals don't last long in the wild before they get eaten up by someone because they're so docile. I've never believed the doctors, scientists, journalists, billionaires, and politicians. They're just predators, they're just out to get you. So what happened over the last two years is honestly not that surprizing.
False equivalency. Predatory animals dont "murder" their prey. In fact they likely dont even have an awareness of life and death as humans do. A lion for example probably considers (for lack of a better word) a gazelle no differently than an elephant considers the vegetation it eats. Its not personal: its food.

The lion doesnt eat the gazelle because it thinks its better than the gazelle and therefore justified

No. The willful malice the (((GloHo))) "elites" have orchestrated on the unassuming masses on a slow burn for decades and then ratcheted up to high since 2020 has absolutely no comparison in the animal kingdom. To compare them is a disservice to even the lowest form of animal
 

homersheineken

Pelican
Protestant
False equivalency. Predatory animals dont "murder" their prey. In fact they likely dont even have an awareness of life and death as humans do. A lion for example probably considers (for lack of a better word) a gazelle no differently than an elephant considers the vegetation it eats. Its not personal: its food.

The lion doesnt eat the gazelle because it thinks its better than the gazelle and therefore justified

No. The willful malice the (((GloHo))) "elites" have orchestrated on the unassuming masses on a slow burn for decades and then ratcheted up to high since 2020 has absolutely no comparison in the animal kingdom. To compare them is a disservice to even the lowest form of animal
I agree with your premise on animals, but we're talking about cats here.

Who absolutely kill for fun/sport, not just food.
 
Top