COVID Passport thread
- Thread starter budoslavic
- Start date
It very much depends on whether or not we are entering Biblical end times or not. Because if it is, they will succeed, and the world will be controlled by evil. This is an important topic as the vaccine/passport is a good bet to lead into the Mark of the Beast. If we are indeed on the brink of the Tribulation, then evil will have a hold like no other, and many will fall into despair, all the way onto the return of Christ.
I hope we have more time but I just see evil winning one battle after another and I don't see enough power among Christians.
It is almost surreal how this is progressing. The thing is, the entity of abomination (should I say man?) will come to "save the world" from what just caused a great war, and usher in "peace." When you see this happening, then you'll know without a doubt. Most people STILL won't believe your report, even when this happens - they will say you are just spewing fairy tales, claims, speculations. And it won't be because it's unbelievable, it'll be because they don't want to think of what it'll be like living outside the new system that is coming.
Lord, give us strength if this time comes, and have mercy.
Did people just forget that HIPAA exists? Patient-doctor privilege? Or the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution? Or freedom of assembly?
How are our "leaders" even allowed to pretend that any of this is legal?
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.How are our "leaders" even allowed to pretend that any of this is legal?
Even ACLU is getting upset about vaxx passport.
www.foxnews.com
ACLU vaccine passport concerns suggest unusual common ground with GOP
The American Civil Liberties Union and some members of the GOP find themselves in rare agreement over the idea of vaccine passports, both expressing privacy concerns and potential government overreach.
Sure the vax passport will be overused. You will go somewhere to get coffee and breakfast; show your pass, taking the bus to work; show your pass, enter your workplace; show your pass, coffee and lunch in your local restaurant ; passport please. Back to your office; scan your health status again... Have a drink after work; vax ID please. Going to the movies; vax pass, please! It will drive people crazy. Here's a solution folks... Just get your implantable chip. It will make things much easier. ...
Easy_C
Peacock
Beat me to it.Even ACLU is getting upset about vaxx passport.
ACLU vaccine passport concerns suggest unusual common ground with GOP
The American Civil Liberties Union and some members of the GOP find themselves in rare agreement over the idea of vaccine passports, both expressing privacy concerns and potential government overreach.
This is more significant than it seems. The ACLU press release is designed to hit on race bait language but it’s relatively important given who owns and runs the ACLU (small *) and it potentially indicates a split of some kind.
HectorLavoe
Woodpecker
Maybe we will only see true large scale resistance against any of this if it is sold as an infringement against coveted victim communites.
-Covid19 being used by the patriarchy to subjugate women.
-Covid19 being used as a tool for white supremecists to subjugate and enslave blacks and other minorities etc.
I get the feeling that when people are speaking out against covid deniers anti vaxxers and anti maskers, they have this image of an evil white man in their mind. Perhaps it is time to use the ideas and narratives of the normies against them. I dont see actual facts and science turning the tide unfortunately.
LawTalkingGuy
Robin
You can't really use their own narrative against them because the masses of proles who get selectively spoon-fed SJW rhetoric via CNN and their professors don't really care as long as they are told they are virtuous for complying with state mandates.
Most people just go along to get along and are not the resistance in any meaningful sense.
Those in denial of reality will have to personally suffer the consequences of being in denial of reality, before it even becomes possible for them to perhaps understand what has been going on, and even then it is not a guarantee.
A man who is denial of gravity will have to fall from his roof and break his legs before you can even begin to attempt to sway him; and still it is no certain thing, he may persist in his denial.
You're forgetting the most important point of all: pro-choice. My body my choice. If the state doesn't have the legal right to prevent you from taking a fetus out of your body then it doesn't have the right to require you to have some mystery chemical put into your body. Any legal precedent that allows for abortion should also allow for vaccine refusal.
Interestingly enough, after Republicans, Blacks are the demographic polling as most resistant to the vaccine because of the history which includes the Tuskegee experiments, etc. American Indians are also expressing hesitation for the same reason.
As to LawTalkingGuy's point, while it's true that most of the zealots will find a way to ignore the contradiction, I think that some who are more moderate could be swayed by being forced to acknowledge the hypocrisy. If nothing else it will be a moral victory - at least they'll know that we recognize it and are exposing them for who they really are. Instead of being principled and consistent, they are nothing more than mere cowards who are able to be programmed to do the bidding of the manipulators.
I know exactly what you mean in regards to conspiracy theorists. Due to the low intellectual level of America, conspiracy theories used to be odd, harmless ones, like aliens or free masons; but now that everything is a hoax, the crazy old conspiracy theorist now makes sense--there's a guy at work who makes total sense with current events, but then goes off the deep side when he talks about pre-2015 material.
Just imagine what could have been done in terms of reducing infectious disease and with improving health in the population in general, if we put as much emphasis on combatting obesity and poor metabolic health as we did vaccines and masks etc. Imagine the same intensity of nagging, with signs everywhere, public announcements on buses and trams etc, the media constantly talking about these issues and also with measures involving the tax system and agricultural practices and so on being promoted to obtain this goal.
It would have an enormously positive impact and every aspect of human health and a whole host of other things like sustainability, environment, the economy, animal wellbeing, the survival of bees and probably many other things as well. It`s extremely well proven that obesity (and the cause which is the modern industrial diet) is the factor that is most decisive in determining the outcomes of infectious disease in the individual, and also the propagation and severity of pathogens in the population as a whole. Yet these elements are omitted totally from both the public discourse and the focus of the media. It`s tempting just to give up at the moment, as it seems that real science is pretty much dead at this time.
It would have an enormously positive impact and every aspect of human health and a whole host of other things like sustainability, environment, the economy, animal wellbeing, the survival of bees and probably many other things as well. It`s extremely well proven that obesity (and the cause which is the modern industrial diet) is the factor that is most decisive in determining the outcomes of infectious disease in the individual, and also the propagation and severity of pathogens in the population as a whole. Yet these elements are omitted totally from both the public discourse and the focus of the media. It`s tempting just to give up at the moment, as it seems that real science is pretty much dead at this time.
While of course everything he says is true, his approach is unfortunate, not to mention emotional. It'll be very easy for the deluded masses to dismiss him as a "fat-shamer," "bigot," or whatever the PC insult of the day is, and the ad hominem approach will be sufficient to wave away his point without actually addressing the substance of the message. Regardless of the truth he presents, approaches like this will sway no one. I understand the situation is dire and the delusion is very deeply ingrained, but if we hope to convince anyone to whatever extent this is possible, we need to remain level-headed and rational and not descend to the degraded level of the enemy.
According to Harvard, obesity itself is contageous. So it represents dangerous epidemic contagion, clearly, considering the rates of the disease, at least in the US.
Obesity is contagious
Public health officials have been working hard to account for the dramatic rise in U.S. obesity rates. Many obvious factors, such as poor diet and a ...
news.harvard.edu
Right, it's not true. I just posted in another thread, recent case EEOC versus Consol Energy, on behalf of Beverly Butcher, who was forced to have his hand scanned for biometric check-in.
This specifically deals with employer trying to force something that one believed was Mark of the Beast. EEOC/Belvery Butcher won, and over 0.5M was awarded, including back pay.
Employer has the duty to provide reasonable accommodation for religious beliefs.
If she works an office job, most likely it can be done remotely, which is reasonable accommodation in this case, and if she ever has to come in they can wear masks or rely on their own vaxx protection.
There no guideline or law requiring her to get the poison, employer is not protected there I believe, but she is protected if she can assert religious belief violation (unless she can use medical exemption grounds).
I fail to see how she can have no choice here. (I have experience successfully dealing with reasonable accommodation/employer stuff, before the hoax).
I was able to do it without a lawyer, but would advise one to get legal consult, it's better.
(I also dealt with big government entity requiring biometrics, and was given an alternative, after sending them a letter threatening lawsuit)
Vaxx is much more serious stuff than use of biometrics.
Just because her employer law firm told her she'd have no choice it doesn't mean a thing. Consol Energy lawyers also thought Beverly Butcher had no choice....they were wrong. Any single word coming from employer's lawyers during dispute is a lie, usually.
Last edited:
As you may already now , The EU is working on a "Green" passport. (= vaxx passport , proof of negative test passport , immunity passport , whatever you want to call it )
I suggest we work on a blue passport. The blue passport will have to be shown to cities and businesses refusing the Jewid19 oppression. A blue passport will be handed only to people who can prove that they have never tested to Jewid19 and never had any vaccine.
If you do not have a blue passport , you cannot talk to us , look at us , walk in the street without a blue star on your jacket , wear a full hijab with a fence , and you must pay a zakat of 1000 EUR per month to at one blue passport owner per month in cash as per reparations for the submitting to the Jewish revolutionary spirit.
I suggest we work on a blue passport. The blue passport will have to be shown to cities and businesses refusing the Jewid19 oppression. A blue passport will be handed only to people who can prove that they have never tested to Jewid19 and never had any vaccine.
If you do not have a blue passport , you cannot talk to us , look at us , walk in the street without a blue star on your jacket , wear a full hijab with a fence , and you must pay a zakat of 1000 EUR per month to at one blue passport owner per month in cash as per reparations for the submitting to the Jewish revolutionary spirit.
Not just that, more, ACLU and other leftist groups had just sued Clearview AI over collection of images for facial recognition, so they hit right at one of the big goals of Big Tech, total facial recognition surveillance like in Israel now, pulling the race angle among other things.
Clearview AI uses your online photos to instantly ID you. That's a problem, lawsuit says
By scraping the web for photos and extracting unique biometric information, Clearview AI violates privacy and chills protected political speech, a lawsuit says.
Immigrant rights groups sue facial-recognition company Clearview AI
Activists say Clearview's massive database violates privacy law. Company claims First Amendment protects it.
www.cbsnews.com
Amen