I take a somewhat more optimistic view that the same lack of intelligence normies have shown in the last year is also afflicting governments. Global IQ has been in decline since the 1700s and governments (and corporations) will not be immune.
For example, here in Australia the government developed an app last year to assist in contact tracing. Despite 1/4 of the population downloading it, it was so farcically developed that it has helped uncover a grand total of 17 corona cases in 12 months.
The EU can’t even rollout their vaccine programme properly, and they have utterly botched every attempt in the last 30 years at creating their commie-utopia (see Euro crisis, migrant crisis etc.). Yet they think they can unveil a green/corona passport to 500m people in +27 languages in time for summer? It’s comical.
Short of Microsoft (conveniently) or another globohomo platform stepping in and providing the overarching software/logistics directly to governments, I sincerely doubt we’ll see anything resembling a globally coherent corona passport for at least 3-4 years.
In the meantime however, the best strategy to counter this entire shift towards a global passport is to use a tactic those of you from this forum’s old PUA days would well recall: agree and amplify. Some ideas to do this include:
- Encourage as many regional/state/national governments as possible to develop their own passports and systems which won’t of course talk to one another. Likewise encourage start-ups and smaller tech firms to work on their own ones. The more splintered the system, the better as it will annoy normies and lead to abandonment of corona passports.
- Start a ranking system where passports are compared to one another for quality thus make normies question the validity of certain types of passports. This doubt could eventually lead to doubts about the whole system.
Hopefully in using the same divide-and-conquer tactics the elites have used on us since WW2 the entire system will start collapse in on itself.
