Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="aynrus" data-source="post: 1458240" data-attributes="member: 20279">Right, it's not true. I just posted in another thread, recent case EEOC versus Consol Energy, on behalf of Beverly Butcher, who was forced to have his hand scanned for biometric check-in.This specifically deals with employer trying to force something that one believed was Mark of the Beast. EEOC/Belvery Butcher won, and over 0.5M was awarded, including back pay.Employer has the duty to provide reasonable accommodation for religious beliefs.If she works an office job, most likely it can be done remotely, which is reasonable accommodation in this case, and if she ever has to come in they can wear masks or rely on their own vaxx protection.There no guideline or law requiring her to get the poison, employer is not protected there I believe, but she is protected if she can assert religious belief violation (unless she can use medical exemption grounds).I fail to see how she can have no choice here. (I have experience successfully dealing with reasonable accommodation/employer stuff, before the hoax).I was able to do it without a lawyer, but would advise one to get legal consult, it's better.(I also dealt with big government entity requiring biometrics, and was given an alternative, after sending them a letter threatening lawsuit)Vaxx is much more serious stuff than use of biometrics.Just because her employer law firm told her she'd have no choice it doesn't mean a thing. Consol Energy lawyers also thought Beverly Butcher had no choice....they were wrong. Any single word coming from employer's lawyers during dispute is a lie, usually.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="aynrus, post: 1458240, member: 20279"] Right, it's not true. I just posted in another thread, recent case EEOC versus Consol Energy, on behalf of Beverly Butcher, who was forced to have his hand scanned for biometric check-in. This specifically deals with employer trying to force something that one believed was Mark of the Beast. EEOC/Belvery Butcher won, and over 0.5M was awarded, including back pay. Employer has the duty to provide reasonable accommodation for religious beliefs. If she works an office job, most likely it can be done remotely, which is reasonable accommodation in this case, and if she ever has to come in they can wear masks or rely on their own vaxx protection. There no guideline or law requiring her to get the poison, employer is not protected there I believe, but she is protected if she can assert religious belief violation (unless she can use medical exemption grounds). I fail to see how she can have no choice here. (I have experience successfully dealing with reasonable accommodation/employer stuff, before the hoax). I was able to do it without a lawyer, but would advise one to get legal consult, it's better. (I also dealt with big government entity requiring biometrics, and was given an alternative, after sending them a letter threatening lawsuit) Vaxx is much more serious stuff than use of biometrics. Just because her employer law firm told her she'd have no choice it doesn't mean a thing. Consol Energy lawyers also thought Beverly Butcher had no choice....they were wrong. Any single word coming from employer's lawyers during dispute is a lie, usually. [/QUOTE]

Verification