Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Stadtaffe" data-source="post: 1568723" data-attributes="member: 10358">What I read now and then &quot;there&#039;s no money in healthy people&quot; does sound like part of the motivation. If the vaccines induce one problem they can then also sell something else to fix it. If you optimise for profit of private enterprise, including pharma, there is probably a level of health in the population which will maximise profit. That level of health is somewhere between &quot;bedridden and half dying&quot; and &quot;supremely fit and healthy&quot;.&nbsp; So some people are too healthy to keep shareholders happy and their health needs to be slightly ruined in the name of capitalism. Also, some people are too close to dying and you don&#039;t want to lose a paying customer. Being very healthy and turning away from prescription medecines is simply a threat to these companies. So if you are too healthy, they want to make you sick, and if you are almost dying, they want to try to make you live a bit longer, although &quot;linger on&quot; is probably more correct than &quot;live&quot; for that segment.Think about factory farming - animals in small enclosures, injections, food specially engineered and optimised. Does anyone believe even slightly what I often hear - to prevent the hospitals being overwhelmed by cases? Even if that were true I believe they should have geared up with more capacity instead of attacking the healthy. Hence the whole thing remains a lie and a conspiracy.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Stadtaffe, post: 1568723, member: 10358"] What I read now and then [I]"there's no money in healthy people"[/I] does sound like part of the motivation. If the vaccines induce one problem they can then also sell something else to fix it. If you optimise for profit of private enterprise, including pharma, there is probably a level of health in the population which will maximise profit. That level of health is somewhere between [I]"bedridden and half dying" [/I]and [I]"supremely fit and healthy"[/I]. So some people are too healthy to keep shareholders happy and their health needs to be slightly ruined in the name of capitalism. Also, some people are too close to dying and you don't want to lose a paying customer. Being very healthy and turning away from prescription medecines is simply a threat to these companies. So if you are too healthy, they want to make you sick, and if you are almost dying, they want to try to make you live a bit longer, although [I]"linger on"[/I] is probably more correct than [I]"live"[/I] for that segment. Think about factory farming - animals in small enclosures, injections, food specially engineered and optimised. Does anyone believe even slightly what I often hear - to prevent the hospitals being overwhelmed by cases? Even if that were true I believe they should have geared up with more capacity instead of attacking the healthy. Hence the whole thing remains a lie and a conspiracy. [/QUOTE]

Verification