Criticisms of Coronavirus narrative and policy
- Thread starter MusicForThePiano
- Start date
Covid cases surging in Tanzania, says US embassy as government downplays virus
Covid-19 case numbers in Tanzania have risen considerably since January, says the United States embassy in the country's largest city, Dar es Salaam.
I'd really, really like this article to be "fact-checked".
In other words, the headline about surging cases is wrong.
They cannot do anything but blatantly lie. If this was a real crisis Tanzania would be hell since June. Surging cases, cases, cases, cases. It's all just magic spells. I'm really tired of this nonsense. I wish Benny Hill would come and mock it into oblivion.
Last edited:
I just had this random thought about event 201:
The fact that it's NEVER mentioned in MSM speaks volumes.
Why wouldn't they write piece after piece about this? How much more interesting can a story get? After all it wasn't a secret or anything conspiratorial. It was out in the open and we should be thanking our leaders in business and politics for being so thoughtful.
Let's do a crazy thought experiment: Pretend our governments and leaders were wholly benevolent (like they claim) and fully transparent (like they claim).
Can you imagine the bragging and boasting that would take place if a pandemic were to hit a mere couple of months after they practiced such a scenario?
You wouldn't be able live a day without being reminded that your leaders had supernatural premonition and saved hundreds of thousands of lives by being prepared for all this.
But they don't.
Despite them always having nothing but praise for themselves, their actions and their abilities noone wants to mention that they saw this coming.
Weird, eh?
But when you leave the thought experiment it's obvious again:
They don't mention it because they don't want people thinking too hard about why it took place. And whether other events like this have taken place. And who sponsors them... and... and... and...
The fact that it's NEVER mentioned in MSM speaks volumes.
Why wouldn't they write piece after piece about this? How much more interesting can a story get? After all it wasn't a secret or anything conspiratorial. It was out in the open and we should be thanking our leaders in business and politics for being so thoughtful.
Let's do a crazy thought experiment: Pretend our governments and leaders were wholly benevolent (like they claim) and fully transparent (like they claim).
Can you imagine the bragging and boasting that would take place if a pandemic were to hit a mere couple of months after they practiced such a scenario?
You wouldn't be able live a day without being reminded that your leaders had supernatural premonition and saved hundreds of thousands of lives by being prepared for all this.
But they don't.
Despite them always having nothing but praise for themselves, their actions and their abilities noone wants to mention that they saw this coming.
Weird, eh?
But when you leave the thought experiment it's obvious again:
They don't mention it because they don't want people thinking too hard about why it took place. And whether other events like this have taken place. And who sponsors them... and... and... and...
The coof is so deadly in Scotland, have a look here for those interested.
This is for all stats/deaths in 2020 'involving' COVID-19.
Of the 6,834 deaths involving COVID-19 between March and December 2020, 93% (6,372) had at least one pre-existing condition.
This is for all stats/deaths in 2020 'involving' COVID-19.
Of the 6,834 deaths involving COVID-19 between March and December 2020, 93% (6,372) had at least one pre-existing condition.
China's chief virologist:
Pretty much - no virus isolation, no conclusive animal studies, nothing - but let us all shut you down - obviously that ubiquitous contact tracing, apping, surveillance of the population - that is just an unfortunate side-effect and not the main goal we had all along.... The entire population is just one step away from getting chipped....
Though part of it is old news - they didn't isolate anything in march 2020, haven't isolated anything until now - even if they may claim some day to have done so as with HIV (you see this one retrovirus among the trillions of retroviruses - aka exosomes - that's HIV - and the other 999 trillion are not HIV).
Pretty much - no virus isolation, no conclusive animal studies, nothing - but let us all shut you down - obviously that ubiquitous contact tracing, apping, surveillance of the population - that is just an unfortunate side-effect and not the main goal we had all along.... The entire population is just one step away from getting chipped....
Red Pill University | Beyond the Matrix
redpilluniversity.org
Though part of it is old news - they didn't isolate anything in march 2020, haven't isolated anything until now - even if they may claim some day to have done so as with HIV (you see this one retrovirus among the trillions of retroviruses - aka exosomes - that's HIV - and the other 999 trillion are not HIV).
I respect Dr Kaufman but he is a social scientist not a true scientist or even a medical doctor. He was recently a guest on another show where he was dismantled by Dr Judy and really showed his lack of understanding on the subject. Be sure you are looking at this guy in a critical light and count how many times his eyes shift left-to-right in a rapid fashion. These two facts were enough for me to realize what I was actually seeing.
An unqualified man using the Dr. title to make it sound like he knows what he is talking about but actually is way in over his head. The virus cannot be isolated outside of the host cell because it cannot survive outside the host needed to replicate therefore will never be isolated and according to Kaufman, doesn't exist. Silly argument and shows his lack of knowledge on the subject.
If you bang the "not isolated so it doesn't exist" drum you better be prepared to eat crow in front of your peers.
An unqualified man using the Dr. title to make it sound like he knows what he is talking about but actually is way in over his head. The virus cannot be isolated outside of the host cell because it cannot survive outside the host needed to replicate therefore will never be isolated and according to Kaufman, doesn't exist. Silly argument and shows his lack of knowledge on the subject.
If you bang the "not isolated so it doesn't exist" drum you better be prepared to eat crow in front of your peers.
Last edited:
integrated
Robin
I'd be interested to see that show with Dr Judy. So far I've found Kaufman's arguments to be quite watertight, so it would be great to hear some rebuttals. Always good to hear both sides.
Viruses might not be able to replicate outside of a host, but they definitely can exist outside of it. It seems reasonable that a virus can therefore be completely isolated, given the right conditions.
From what I can remember, Kaufman's main argument is that unless an isolated and filtered sample is obtained, and Koch's postulates are satisfied, it's not possible to definitively establish the etiology of the disease. It seems like a reasonable expectation, given that the postulates are supposed to be widely adhered to.
For example, here's a study of the original SARS virus:
Kaufman actually seems to have quite a solid background. Even if he didn't have the credentials, I'd probably still listen to him. The argument/insight matters more than the person at the end of the day.
I never found him either convincing or ingenuous. My position is that now is not the time to start questioning whether viruses exist or any other fringe theory. It's hard enough convincing people that CV19 is not the threat they've been led to believe, so bombarding them with germ theory, etc., is counter-productive.
Last edited:
He has a degree in microbiology that he does not use. On top of it he is a psychiatrist - which is a full medical degree - so he has 2 degrees.
Dr Judy what? Dr Judy Mivkovits who has worked in the biolabs? My guess is that you refer to the exosome-theory vs germ-theory or even the existence of viruses. Dr Lanka was once a leading virologist and fully began to question the assumptions of the virus theory.
Being able to use lingo does not make it true as Dr. Kaufman put out his statements quite well. The big caveat with so-called whistleblowers like Mivkovits is that you are still bloody left in the super-belief of the super-virus - this time man-made, so you should still give away all your rights, your work, your freedoms - just because it's an escaped or released biolab virus. And voila - they have you by the balls either way. But this does not explain Japan, Sweden, Norway, Tanzania - or any country that did not change their healthcare system. Heck - it does not even explain why it took 6-8 months for some countries to experience even a marginal uptick in mortality - only when healthcare was significantly impacted and people did not go for heart surgeries, cancer surgeries and other routine interventions.
So yeah - believe in whatever you want. Oh - and Kaufmann has a higher education standard than Mifkovits - that woman just has experience in so-called biolabs which is essentially usually just the elaborate killing of cell-probes - occasionally you murder animals in those tests - something which also can have a multitude of reasons.
That is true for sure - best option is to just say that the cure is worse than the disease. Dr. Kaufmann also said a few times that he does not go into the germ-theory, virus- vs exosome-theory, because it's too far removed from the current belief-system or supposed standard of science.
Most of the time - only when people realize how often and how much the elite have been lying to them - then they may give such assumptions a chance. But by that time they usually disbelieve most things put out by the media and establishment, so it's not a big jump.
Fake President: "You must wear mask until April 2021 through 2022".
chromium50
Pigeon
Is the media starting to wake up?
www.dailymail.co.uk
California and Florida took different approaches and had same result
Historically, Florida has had 8,306 cases and 117 deaths per 100,000 residents and California has had about 8,499 cases per 100,000 residents and 130 deaths per 100,000.
^ Children test themselves for COVID-19 at private school in Boston
Children test themselves for COVID-19 at private school in Boston | NTV Houston
news.ntvhouston.com
Edit. Re: Ginkgo Bioworks.
Article from December 21, 2018, "This $1 billion start-up backed by Bill Gates prints new DNA — and everyone from the DOD to Bayer is on board".
This $1 billion start-up backed by Bill Gates prints new DNA — and everyone from the DOD to Bayer is on board
Ginkgo uses genetic engineering to design and print new DNA that can then be used for anything from killing antibiotic-resistant germs to creating self-fertilizing plants to making cheaper perfume.
Last edited:
I'm still in disbelief over how incredibly naive the German population is.
I knew noone had an interest in alternate views of history and conspiracies that lead to every single war in the 20th century, because it didn't affect them (they thought).
But now that they are locked in at home, their business closed, children traumatized and bodily integrity threatened. They're STILL not willing to entertain any thought of foul play.
These criminals actually sold us a pandemic without more people dying than any other year. And the statistics are freely available.
It's mind boggling.
And when I talk to otherwise intelligent friends and say that, you'd think the reaction would be: "No way! Show me those numbers! That can't be true because that would have wide reaching implications."
Instead their reaction is: "Hm...oh well. That's weird."
edit: Is the statistic screenshot showing for you guys? I keep uploading it on imgurl and then it shows for a couple of minutes and then its shown blank for me
edit2: I just realized it's not a good screenshot when you haven't seen the talk he gives. On the left the population is divided into age groups and then he calculates what % of people in those age groups died every year. Because Germany grows by a couple of hundred thousand every year but simultaneously ages rapidly. So absolute numbers can't be used.
No age group died at a higher rate. Not even 80+ or 90+ year olds
edit3: and we have the former president 'federal office of constitutional defense' (Präsident des Bundesamtes für Verfassungsschutzes) Hans Georg-Maaßen on record confirming that
I knew noone had an interest in alternate views of history and conspiracies that lead to every single war in the 20th century, because it didn't affect them (they thought).
But now that they are locked in at home, their business closed, children traumatized and bodily integrity threatened. They're STILL not willing to entertain any thought of foul play.
These criminals actually sold us a pandemic without more people dying than any other year. And the statistics are freely available.
It's mind boggling.
And when I talk to otherwise intelligent friends and say that, you'd think the reaction would be: "No way! Show me those numbers! That can't be true because that would have wide reaching implications."
Instead their reaction is: "Hm...oh well. That's weird."
edit: Is the statistic screenshot showing for you guys? I keep uploading it on imgurl and then it shows for a couple of minutes and then its shown blank for me
edit2: I just realized it's not a good screenshot when you haven't seen the talk he gives. On the left the population is divided into age groups and then he calculates what % of people in those age groups died every year. Because Germany grows by a couple of hundred thousand every year but simultaneously ages rapidly. So absolute numbers can't be used.
No age group died at a higher rate. Not even 80+ or 90+ year olds
edit3: and we have the former president 'federal office of constitutional defense' (Präsident des Bundesamtes für Verfassungsschutzes) Hans Georg-Maaßen on record confirming that
Last edited:
Well maybe I wasn't clear on my post so I will try to clarify. Say I were to have a degree in computer science, does that make me a software engineer? A software engineer that can challenge other software engineers who worked at the top of their field for decades on basic scientific theory? Probably not but the fact remains, you guys are taking viral advice from a psychiatrist that really shouldn't be in a position to convey such information.
Now what if I had a degree in Physical Science, does this make me an authority on anything other that I will possibly sit at the head of a table when seated with a bunch of high school graduates? Does it make me any smarter or have any more knowledge on a particular subject? Fortunately no it does not.
I stand by what I posted that you are doing a disservice to claim the virus doesn't exist and are playing right in to their "it doesn't exist" false flag.
HT
integrated
Robin
The problem is, even if someone has the 'appropriate' credentials, this doesn't automatically validate their argument. If we are ruthlessly logical, who a person is does not matter as much as their argument. To say otherwise is to commit an ad hominem and/or an appeal to authority fallacy.
Having the credentials does make someone more likely to be correct, simply because the chances are higher that they have broader and deeper knowledge and experience. But it does not mean that someone without any credentials cannot make useful contributions with enough self-directed study and intelligence. Take Michael Faraday for example - no formal scientific training, but made some incredible advances in physics.
Dr Ed Dutton did an excellent video about how genius scientists are more likely to be amateurs:
Science isn't meant to be an authoritarian guild. In its ideal form, it is a cold, rational discipline that advances by continually overturning currently-accepted theories to find better ones. A theory can be overturned by anyone, even your local street cleaner, if a replicable observation is made that the theory cannot account for.
The issue with science today is that it has been contaminated by corporate interests, political affiliations, and a dogmatic, cult-like mentality. Hence the replication crisis, the bias towards reductionist materialism, and the extreme hostility towards anyone publishing something that goes against the prevailing political ideology. You're more likely to find the truth on the fringes nowadays.
All of the people you mention worked in their fields: Kaufman does and has not worked in this capacity. One should not ignore this detail because it is significant. Reading peer reviewed scientific studies and doing a detailed analysis does not do it for me. And his limitations really showed when he debated someone with real knowledge. He constantly interrupted the debate and was kicked out of the meeting as a result. Darting eyes and unable to hold a rational debate with another adult destroyed his credibility rather quickly.
All you essentially have is Dr. Kaufman's personal opinion nothing more nothing less and extensive credentials does not change this fact.
You cannot grow a retrovirus without a host cell and this is where your isolation argument stands. Or maybe I am confused?
All you essentially have is Dr. Kaufman's personal opinion nothing more nothing less and extensive credentials does not change this fact.
You cannot grow a retrovirus without a host cell and this is where your isolation argument stands. Or maybe I am confused?
Last edited:
integrated
Robin
Not quite. What I was saying was that it is possible for a virus to survive outside of a host cell, therefore it can be isolated (in theory).
Is this the debate with Dr Judy Mikovits you're referring to?
Last edited: