Criticisms of Coronavirus narrative and policy

LeoniusD

Pelican
Temporarily closed: Team suffers from side effects?

Anyone who had an appointment at the praxis of ear, nose and throat specialists Michael Prasch and Anke Prasch-Beginen in Viersen-Süchteln on Tuesday afternoon was faced with a closed door. The doctors had closed their practice on Ostring at short notice. The reason could be read on a big yellow sign: "We have all been vaccinated against Corona last night. 2/3 of the team is suffering from side effects, so no consultation hours can take place."

https://de.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20210222204210AAvICMt
That is exactly as I read on the book by a doctor written about the so-called Spanish flu. That doc was a naturopathic one and he refused the vaxx - meanwhile almost all his colleagues and nurses got the life-saving WWI-vaxxes and then came down with the Spanish flu. They had to go from doctor to doctor and nurse them back to health because there was almost no one left.

Back then they controlled the entire media landscape and got away with a fake pandemic that was caused by vaccines.

It's amazing how they are getting away with it now.

Even doubting people here do not realize that even the cases they see are only happening in the population parts that get tested regularly. I have two level of family and acquaintances - those that got tested several times and those that don't even know anyone who got tested.

Those that got tested had strange occurances like 20 people getting tested before an event and then all 20 people (between 25 and 45 and all fit) suddenly coming down with the covid within days after that mass-test. Whatever is in the test can be transferred seemingly to their families who also came down with something. Also my colleagues who got repeatedly tested all came down with covid supposedly after one of those company-directed tests.

Then on the other side I have family and friends who never tested and don't have anyone even in the vicinity who tested - they are all fit as a fiddle - none was even remotely sick. And most among those are 40 to 90 in age - nothing.

This new elite-created Spanish Flu is nothing but something created with those tests and then the usual poison of vaccination. They simply cannot do any killer-viruses.
 

C-Note

Hummingbird
Gold Member
Apparently Naomi Wolf is a fairly prominent feminist and progressive influencer, but she is strongly against the Covid restrictions:


I would be interested in asking her if she realizes that her party's wild swing towards fascism is because of their embracing of the globalist, totalitarian political philosophy? Apparently, the globalist fascists that control Wikipedia's political topics decided around the start of the pandemic "crisis" that she was no longer of the body, as most of the criticisms in her Wikipedia biography were added over the past year, including the defamatory statements in the article's intro. One of the easiest ways to tell if a public figure is currently on the globalist approved list is to check their Wikipedia entry to see if there is any kind of criticism.
 

Johnnyvee

Ostrich
Leftist pseudoscience publication the Lancet removed a study that indicated that vitamin D treatment could have a beneficial effect on covid-19 outcomes. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3771318
With all the other crap papers that the have allowed in the recent years, this is just another confirmation that most scientific journals have been corrupted by the forces that be.

The reason they cite for withdrawing the paper that had received a lot of attention was this;

"..We have removed this preprint due to concerns about the description of the research in this paper. This has led us to initiate an investigation into this study..."

Why not just let the research stand for itself and let other scientists and the public make up their own minds as to the validity of the data? Isn`t that what science is supposed to be about? I think that the reason for that is quite obvious at this stage. You can`t really make much money from selling vitamin supplements! And if vitamin D pills work, then that might draw the attention of the public towards getting some sun exposure, and also other things like diet that have an effect on both vitamin D status and so many other health aspects that are related to immune function also.

There are quite a few other studies that have highlighted (directly or indirectly) the effect of diet and supplements in the battle against infectious disease and the Corona virus in particular also. The reason that they decided to withdraw this particular paper must have been due to the attention it was receiving again. One must conclude then that this also would have been the case for the other studies involving diet etc. had they reached the minds of the general public. I see this pattern all the time since I read a lot of studies. If what you publish goes against the agenda, you are safe as long as it`s so intricate and tabloid headline unfriendly that only a handful of geeks will ever read and understand it. If you get any real significant attention however, you will either not be allowed to publish in the first place, or you will be censored in some fashion.

As for the implication of this particular study, the data is quite clear that vitamin D is vital for human health and function. But I think that it`s better to get it from moderate sun exposure, rather than in supplement form. But a good quality vitamin D3 supplement is also a reasonable option if you don`t have access to ample sunlight. I also recommend high quality canned sardines, as they are excellent in terms of vitamin D and many other nutrients also. I think the main effect is that vitamin D levels will elevate the enzymatic fuel NAD+, that in turn has an effect on epigenetic regulation and basically promotes a more youthful gene expression that includes improved immune function also.
 

r3d

Woodpecker
Leftist pseudoscience publication the Lancet removed a study that indicated that vitamin D treatment could have a beneficial effect on covid-19 outcomes. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3771318
With all the other crap papers that the have allowed in the recent years, this is just another confirmation that most scientific journals have been corrupted by the forces that be.

The reason they cite for withdrawing the paper that had received a lot of attention was this;

"..We have removed this preprint due to concerns about the description of the research in this paper. This has led us to initiate an investigation into this study..."

Why not just let the research stand for itself and let other scientists and the public make up their own minds as to the validity of the data? Isn`t that what science is supposed to be about? I think that the reason for that is quite obvious at this stage. You can`t really make much money from selling vitamin supplements! And if vitamin D pills work, then that might draw the attention of the public towards getting some sun exposure, and also other things like diet that have an effect on both vitamin D status and so many other health aspects that are related to immune function also.

There are quite a few other studies that have highlighted (directly or indirectly) the effect of diet and supplements in the battle against infectious disease and the Corona virus in particular also. The reason that they decided to withdraw this particular paper must have been due to the attention it was receiving again. One must conclude then that this also would have been the case for the other studies involving diet etc. had they reached the minds of the general public. I see this pattern all the time since I read a lot of studies. If what you publish goes against the agenda, you are safe as long as it`s so intricate and tabloid headline unfriendly that only a handful of geeks will ever read and understand it. If you get any real significant attention however, you will either not be allowed to publish in the first place, or you will be censored in some fashion.

As for the implication of this particular study, the data is quite clear that vitamin D is vital for human health and function. But I think that it`s better to get it from moderate sun exposure, rather than in supplement form. But a good quality vitamin D3 supplement is also a reasonable option if you don`t have access to ample sunlight. I also recommend high quality canned sardines, as they are excellent in terms of vitamin D and many other nutrients also. I think the main effect is that vitamin D levels will elevate the enzymatic fuel NAD+, that in turn has an effect on epigenetic regulation and basically promotes a more youthful gene expression that includes improved immune function also.


Don't know if it's been posted before, but the lancet also published a study on the ineffectiveness on hydroxychloroquine which turned out to be completely made up. When criticism was voiced they quietly redacted it, but the damage had already been done.

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/lancet-retracts-large-study-hydroxychloroquine-n1225091

This looks like the only MSM outlet that touched the story (a HUGE scandal, mind you)

Those are the worlds the alternative news sources found on the subject:

https://fort-russ.com/2020/06/expos...hydroxychloroquine-killing-tens-of-thousands/


Criminals.
 
Don't know if it's been posted before, but the lancet also published a study on the ineffectiveness on hydroxychloroquine which turned out to be completely made up. When criticism was voiced they quietly redacted it, but the damage had already been done.

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/lancet-retracts-large-study-hydroxychloroquine-n1225091

This looks like the only MSM outlet that touched the story (a HUGE scandal, mind you)

Those are the worlds the alternative news sources found on the subject:

https://fort-russ.com/2020/06/expos...hydroxychloroquine-killing-tens-of-thousands/


Criminals.

Prior to 2020 i had thought that the integrity of medical research journals was sacrosanct, and that the science spoke for itself and would sink or swim in the peer review. Obviously scientists and labs can be funded for an agenda, and big pharma is largely a parasitic sham, but the idea that a premier medical journal would be ignoring the data in order to push a false narrative was beyond my overton window.

Between the fake HQC study, and the Danish mask study performed over the summer (and outright denied publication by Lancet, NEJM, and another major pub), there is no doubt of the corruption and manipulation at hand.

Those are only the most glaring examples, too. Johns Hopkins promptly retracted another paper where a scientist called the death numbers a hoax. I'm sure there have been many smaller fish wiped out for swimming against the stream. And it's likely been this way for a long time.
 

r3d

Woodpecker
This self-made crisis just keeps on giving:

I just read that last year in november the government altered some very important defintions in laws relating to media outlets. That means the government can now go after online platforms such as blogs and alternative media news if they feel they aren't doing their 'due diligence'.

At least 10 websites were already notified to change or take down stories they ran. In one example they cited an article about covid, that itself merely complained about the one-sidedness of MSM and quoted another virologist that disagreed with the mainstream concensus.

If the stories aren't changed to reflect a 'more professional journalistic standard' the government can take legal action.

German fellows search for: 'Landesmedienanstalt Zensur'

SZ Artikel

I'm stunned. Those are Soviet style rogue government levels we are reaching.
 

Eusebius Erasmus

Pelican
Orthodox
I apologize if this has been posted, but this is important scientific work (see Conclusion):
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13484

Abstract​


Background and Aims​

The most restrictive nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) for controlling the spread of COVID‐19 are mandatory stay‐at‐home and business closures. Given the consequences of these policies, it is important to assess their effects. We evaluate the effects on epidemic case growth of more restrictive NPIs (mrNPIs), above and beyond those of less‐restrictive NPIs (lrNPIs).

Methods​

We first estimate COVID‐19 case growth in relation to any NPI implementation in subnational regions of 10 countries: England, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, South Korea, Sweden and the United States. Using first‐difference models with fixed effects, we isolate the effects of mrNPIs by subtracting the combined effects of lrNPIs and epidemic dynamics from all NPIs. We use case growth in Sweden and South Korea, 2 countries that did not implement mandatory stay‐at‐home and business closures, as comparison countries for the other 8 countries (16 total comparisons).

Results​

Implementing any NPIs was associated with significant reductions in case growth in 9 out of 10 study countries, including South Korea and Sweden that implemented only lrNPIs (Spain had a nonsignificant effect). After subtracting the epidemic and lrNPI effects, we find no clear, significant beneficial effect of mrNPIs on case growth in any country. In France, for example, the effect of mrNPIs was +7% (95% CI: −5%‐19%) when compared with Sweden and + 13% (−12%‐38%) when compared with South Korea (positive means pro‐contagion). The 95% confidence intervals excluded 30% declines in all 16 comparisons and 15% declines in 11/16 comparisons.

Conclusions​

While small benefits cannot be excluded, we do not find significant benefits on case growth of more restrictive NPIs. Similar reductions in case growth may be achievable with less‐restrictive interventions.
 
Prior to 2020 i had thought that the integrity of medical research journals was sacrosanct, and that the science spoke for itself and would sink or swim in the peer review. Obviously scientists and labs can be funded for an agenda, and big pharma is largely a parasitic sham, but the idea that a premier medical journal would be ignoring the data in order to push a false narrative was beyond my overton window.

Between the fake HQC study, and the Danish mask study performed over the summer (and outright denied publication by Lancet, NEJM, and another major pub), there is no doubt of the corruption and manipulation at hand.

Those are only the most glaring examples, too. Johns Hopkins promptly retracted another paper where a scientist called the death numbers a hoax. I'm sure there have been many smaller fish wiped out for swimming against the stream. And it's likely been this way for a long time.


Deborah Birx admits on live camera that anyone that dies with Covid19 is counted as a Covid death.



Even with video evidence right out of Dr. Birx' own mouth, the vast majority that I've showed this information to still don't believe it.
 

Pantheon

Sparrow
Orthodox
I think a huge red flag in light of climate change and the corona phenomenon is that politics is becoming merged with science. People assume that this is the "right" way to go, but in reality ethical decisions are being made technically. That means politicians don't even know right from wrong, because they don't exercise any moral judgement. Hence all that is human is removed from political governance, which is the triumph of technocracy. This is why all politicians are paid actors, whereas the real leaders are in the private sector.
 

budoslavic

Owl
Orthodox
Gold Member

"If...positive for COVID-19...immediately quarantine in designated government facilities."


fa19d2cbc1ea62b5.jpeg


Sources


 

LeoniusD

Pelican

"If...positive for COVID-19...immediately quarantine in designated government facilities."


fa19d2cbc1ea62b5.jpeg


Sources


Wow - some of the most stringest insane measures. It's only one step away of creating gulags. Designated government facilities sounds nicer than gulag for now. And you get tested again and again even if you are negative.

This will destroy tourism - just as they want it.

Remember - Great Reset or Agenda21/AGenda2030 is set to create worldwide communitarianism which means that most people won't be able to travel beyond their own FEMA region/state. You will require permits and passports just to leave your area, let alone the country. That is the goal past 2050-2060, but one step at a time they are building it.

Currently there is still plenty to go and live in peace - still Canada is not on the list of those places.
 

Grow Bag

Kingfisher
Wow - some of the most stringest insane measures. It's only one step away of creating gulags. Designated government facilities sounds nicer than gulag for now. And you get tested again and again even if you are negative.

This will destroy tourism - just as they want it.

Remember - Great Reset or Agenda21/AGenda2030 is set to create worldwide communitarianism which means that most people won't be able to travel beyond their own FEMA region/state. You will require permits and passports just to leave your area, let alone the country. That is the goal past 2050-2060, but one step at a time they are building it.

Currently there is still plenty to go and live in peace - still Canada is not on the list of those places.
It's that gym guy again with something to say about all this.
 
Top