Criticisms of Coronavirus narrative and policy

Yeah I also saw this in 2020 just by looking at the biostatistical data. The amount of evidence in favor of ivermectin is absolutely massive. 59 solid studies have been done so far, and the vast majority have found that ivermectin is effective. Especially as prophylaxis or early treatment. In fact, it has more evidence in its favor than pretty much anything else (each circle here is a study, green meaning the treatment was found to help with covid, red meaning it harms you):
View attachment 58553
When I saw this, and I saw how the entire medical industry and media was denying it, it became so obvious that politicians and bureaucrats were acting on their own greed, and most doctors were either in some sort of a trance or terrified to question the status quo.

If we had offered proper early treatment, I think we could have avoided up to 90% of covid deaths. So that the number of those dying purely from covid without comorbidities would be just a few thousand in the US. Hence, there would have been no need for lockdowns, vaccines, masks, any of the other garbage they threw at us. But of course, there was no money to be made from cheap ivermectin, and no power to be gained without fear.
We did avoid 94% of “COVID deaths “ by changing cause of death cert criteria back to “of” instead of “with”. The other 6% if we then changed to seasonal flu like every other year
 
Yeah I also saw this in 2020 just by looking at the biostatistical data. The amount of evidence in favor of ivermectin is absolutely massive. 59 solid studies have been done so far, and the vast majority have found that ivermectin is effective. Especially as prophylaxis or early treatment. In fact, it has more evidence in its favor than pretty much anything else (each circle here is a study, green meaning the treatment was found to help with covid, red meaning it harms you):
View attachment 58553
When I saw this, and I saw how the entire medical industry and media was denying it, it became so obvious that politicians and bureaucrats were acting on their own greed, and most doctors were either in some sort of a trance or terrified to question the status quo.

If we had offered proper early treatment, I think we could have avoided up to 90% of covid deaths. So that the number of those dying purely from covid without comorbidities would be just a few thousand in the US. Hence, there would have been no need for lockdowns, vaccines, masks, any of the other garbage they threw at us. But of course, there was no money to be made from cheap ivermectin, and no power to be gained without fear.
How are we supposed to read this? It is saying that Vit D and sunlight are more "risky" than Ivermectin? How is Remdesivir with a 50%+ mortality rate equally "risky" as aspirin?
 
How are we supposed to read this? It is saying that Vit D and sunlight are more "risky" than Ivermectin? How is Remdesivir with a 50%+ mortality rate equally "risky" as aspirin?
No I wouldn't say that at all. The reason we do meta-analysis like this is because we can't always trust the results from any one individual study. In the case of Vitamin D, some studies did find that it's harmful. This could be for any number of reasons, like the patients were sicker than usual, or they were given very poor care, or the study was poorly designed and biased... or it could just be pure chance. You would have to do go into each individual study and look at it to see if it's worthy. The authors of this meta-study seem to have done that and excluded many studies already, but it would be dishonest to exclude everything you disagree with. That's something Big Pharma does to trick people by manipulating numbers. When you look at a large number of studies, the effects of bias and randomness tend to disappear.

In any case, the vast majority of the Vit D studies showed it had a positive effect as we would expect. There are only four sunlight studies and they are all positive. I think the reason they put sunlight lower down on the list than ivermectin is that, in statistical terms, a 4-0 record is still "worse" than a record of something like 90-10 which we have for ivermectin. There is more evidence for ivermectin's efficacy. The evidence for remdesivir and aspirin appears to be more unclear. The only thing that really seems to harm people on this list is acetaminophen.
 
I don't know if this was posted, but it was scrubbed from youtube. Author and Dr. Thomas Cowan was interviewed on Valuetainment by that chatty Persian guy Patrick, they discuss his book "The Contagion Myth," which has been reprinted as "The Truth About Contagion" in later editions:

He goes in-depth into the medical lingo and the initial observatory fallacies in which the "transmissible" event was claimed for diseases.

 
sJN7n4n.png




 
There is definitely something to the original idea I had on this thread with how 5G interacts with molecules. Whether its purely transmitted across the RF spectrum, the strength of the signal, and how much of the graphene we have in our bodies all plays a role in determining cellular destruction.

Here is an interesting video, although the setting is degenerate (warning some language and hooliganism):
"A 5G phone can do this to a bottle of champagne, imagine what it does to your blood"


The injected bioweapon will react differently depending on what is interacting with it from the outside.
 
There is definitely something to the original idea I had on this thread with how 5G interacts with molecules. Whether its purely transmitted across the RF spectrum, the strength of the signal, and how much of the graphene we have in our bodies all plays a role in determining cellular destruction.

Here is an interesting video, although the setting is degenerate (warning some language and hooliganism):
"A 5G phone can do this to a bottle of champagne, imagine what it does to your blood"


The injected bioweapon will react differently depending on what is interacting with it from the outside.

I'm sure it will do something similar to people's veins, especially the ones who got the graphene oxide jabs.
 
There is definitely something to the original idea I had on this thread with how 5G interacts with molecules. Whether its purely transmitted across the RF spectrum, the strength of the signal, and how much of the graphene we have in our bodies all plays a role in determining cellular destruction.

Here is an interesting video, although the setting is degenerate (warning some language and hooliganism):
"A 5G phone can do this to a bottle of champagne, imagine what it does to your blood"


The injected bioweapon will react differently depending on what is interacting with it from the outside.

The reports of multiple people dying in their sleep - I wonder how many had their phone near them.
 
There is definitely something to the original idea I had on this thread with how 5G interacts with molecules. Whether its purely transmitted across the RF spectrum, the strength of the signal, and how much of the graphene we have in our bodies all plays a role in determining cellular destruction.

Here is an interesting video, although the setting is degenerate (warning some language and hooliganism):
"A 5G phone can do this to a bottle of champagne, imagine what it does to your blood"


The injected bioweapon will react differently depending on what is interacting with it from the outside.

Probably a trick but there is no doubt emf and 5g is harmful to human health.

Matter is very very high frequency emf. at certain high frequencies the energy emitted sublimates into matter. Theoretically you could have a emf laser that shoots out energy of virusus, or other specific micro matter.
 
Twitter feed of a doctor that just lost his medical license in Ontario


9/I realized was that you cannot have true peace in your heart when you still put your trust in material or worldly things or structures. As long as I believe a medical license, a job, or even institutions like courts or charter rights will keep me safe, then I never will be

10/True safety comes from realizing that we are actually spiritual beings who are DREAMING a separate,miserable, human bodily existence. It's not the truth of who we are So these circumstances where seeming enemies and calamities come at us are actually opportunities to wake up

11/ They are gifts your "enemy" gives you can turn spiritual learning into profound experience of the truth. When you finally jump off that diving board and into cool, refreshing swimming pool.

12/When you step through that glitch in the matrix, and and you feel the peace that comes from laying down all your defenses, some major changes happen in your perspective. First of all, you realize that you're safe no matter what happens.

13/The second is that you realize that the people you thought were your enemies are actually your friends. Crazily, you can actually be grateful for them and all they've done for you because they brought you to the experience of God and to complete an unconditional peace.

14/ I think this is why so many people's lives seem to fall apart and go to hell when they have a spiritual awakening. It seems like punishment but it's really a purification. It really transforms profoundly when you realize that the trials and tribulations are actually gifts.

15/ Not just gifts in the worldly sense of getting a better job or a better circumstance, but even more valuable ones where you wake up to your true nature and start to escape the matrix.
 
Last edited:
Twitter feed of a doctor that just lost his medical license in Ontario


The Faithful just received another doctor. It continues to grow!
 
Twitter feed of a doctor that just lost his medical license in Ontario

This is the kind of person who is looking for Christ but may not fully know or embrace it yet.

Interesting that he mentions David Hawkins. His works seem to be exploding in popularity now as people seek the truth. Covid really woke a lot of people up.

I was also a believer in Hawkins's system before, until I abandoned it because it is ultimately New Age and ecumenistic. But it was a stepping stone for me as a former agnostic too.

Suffice to say we are all going through similar things before we find our way home.
 
F3BJ-NKaoAY33JY



F3BKh_mXAAAI8ql


"A new COVID variant...called EG.5...a descendant of Omicron"

giphy.gif


Edit. From the above mentioned article:
Dr. Isaac Bogoch, an infectious disease specialist at University Health Network in Toronto, said he expects cases of EG.5 to pop up in Canada soon, if they aren’t already.

“It's probably everywhere and if it isn't everywhere, it'll be everywhere,” he told CTVNews.ca in a phone interview Monday.

Bogoch said he expects the presence of EG.5 will “very likely” be similar to what was observed with other sublineages of Omicron, with the latest variant gradually becoming the most dominant sublineage around the world.

“We saw a BA.2, we saw a BA.4 and BA.5, we saw an XBB and now it's EG.5, so the virus continues to mutate and we're gonna see waxing and waning of the virus in the community,” he said.
 
Last edited:
F3BJ-NKaoAY33JY



F3BKh_mXAAAI8ql


"A new COVID variant...called EG.5...a descendant of Omicron"

giphy.gif
We all know this is a direct, willful lie, but it's funny to point out how plainly this is the case.


This is the link I used to go to for corona virus stats during the fake plandemic. It has world wide totals for daily new cases, and daily covid deaths. It also has breakdowns for countries, and for states in the US.

It currently shows average global covid deaths of around 200 a day, which statistically is nothing. As we all know, even these deaths are almost certainly not due to covid per se. So, there is no new spike of covid. Even the numbers produced by public health officials confirm it, and if they could lie and say it's worse, they would.
 
Back
Top