Dating culture falls even further: Women think it's cool to be a childless cat lady

Arado

Pelican
Gold Member
RE: Dating culture falls even further: Women think it's cool be a childless cat lady

Long Haired Samson said:
Question is, how does this fictional female figure get a "suspicious amount of money"? Along with the part about exotic travel, is this a reference to being a Dubai porta-potty / instagram whore?

In Silicon Valley, where I live, these type of women can make oodles of money. I've mentioned before a former coworker of mine. A pretty, curvatious, Vietnamese chick. She has a bachelor's and master's degree in mechanical engineering. She's 36 now, single, no children. She just bought a home in San Francisco which is outrageously expensive to live in. I'm guessing she's making at least $160K-$170K a year. And she travels inseessently all over the world. In the 12 years I've known her I have never known her to date anyone. Not men nor women. Either, she's a monk or she keeps that on the super down low.

I don't think she's that representative though, her IQ is probably top 5% and this is during an economic boom. The next recession may bring many of these cat ladies back to humility.
 
Arado said:
Long Haired Samson said:
Question is, how does this fictional female figure get a "suspicious amount of money"? Along with the part about exotic travel, is this a reference to being a Dubai porta-potty / instagram whore?

In Silicon Valley, where I live, these type of women can make oodles of money. I've mentioned before a former coworker of mine. A pretty, curvatious, Vietnamese chick. She hais a bachelor's and master's degree in mechanical engineering. She's 36 now, single, no children. She just bought a home in San Francisco which is outrageously expensive to live in. I'm guessing she's making at least $160K-$170K a year. And she travels inseessently all over the world. In the 12 years I've known her I have never known her to date anyone. Not men nor women. Either, she's a monk or she keeps that on the super down low.

I don't think she's that representative though, her IQ is probably top 5% and this is during an economic boom. The next recession may bring many of these cat ladies back to humility.

I agree with this. She graduated from a very prestigious engineering school in Southern CA and despite all the travel she has saved a ton of many through investments. I'm a bit fascinated as to why she is not married. Her parents are both still alive and still married. She has a sister who is married and has kids. Her BBF got married and now has kids. She often posts pictures on social media with her nephews. It's clear she loves kids. So what is the deal here? With her looks and money she could land a Silicon Valley Google/Apple/Tesla beta boy with an Asian fetish who would gladly impregnate her about six times over.

I know other young women like this. About seven years ago my engineering group hired a new young female engineer at a major aerospace company. She was very smart had a degree in Aerospace Engineering. She became a VP of well known space company before turning 30. She turned 30 recently, died her hair purple and she did a "bikini shoot" for fun. Granted, she looks amazing but what is the point of all this? This is the type of stuff that could come back to haunt her career. Can you image she is interviewing at Boeing or Lockheed Martin ten,twelve years from now and this video and photos come out? LOL. Oh, and she is single and childless as well but does have some time to get married and start a family.
 

bucky

Ostrich
Dirtyblueshirt said:
Question is, how does this fictional female figure get a "suspicious amount of money"? Along with the part about exotic travel, is this a reference to being a Dubai porta-potty / instagram whore?

To be fair, not having kids does help on the money front quite a bit. Not advocating that, I love having kids, but still.
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
A lot of mediocre women have been sucked up into the upper levels of corporate life in the last 20 years just through affirmative action. It's somewhat like a lesser version of the lottery with smaller, more numerous prizes.

The upshot of AA is that it's become impossible to presume that any woman or minority has earned their place which is surely extremely depressing for the ones that really worked hard to get where they are.

And in a depression the AA hires will be the last to go. Team satanic Inversion will burn the world down before they ever again concede to a white patriarchal normosexual Christian power structure.
 

Papaya

Peacock
Gold Member
Long Haired Samson said:
Question is, how does this fictional female figure get a "suspicious amount of money"? Along with the part about exotic travel, is this a reference to being a Dubai porta-potty / instagram whore?

In Silicon Valley, where I live, these type of women can make oodles of money. I've mentioned before a former coworker of mine. A pretty, curvatious, Vietnamese chick. She has a bachelor's and master's degree in mechanical engineering. She's 36 now, single, no children. She just bought a home in San Francisco which is outrageously expensive to live in. I'm guessing she's making at least $160K-$170K a year. And she travels inseessently all over the world. In the 12 years I've known her I have never known her to date anyone. Not men nor women. Either, she's a monk or she keeps that on the super down low.

If she just bought a home in San Fran shes probably making significantly more than $160-$170k a year. Median home price is $1.3million now
 

Arado

Pelican
Gold Member
RE: Dating culture falls even further: Women think it's cool to be a childless cat

Leonard D Neubache said:
A lot of mediocre women have been sucked up into the upper levels of corporate life in the last 20 years just through affirmative action. It's somewhat like a lesser version of the lottery with smaller, more numerous prizes.

The upshot of AA is that it's become impossible to presume that any woman or minority has earned their place which is surely extremely depressing for the ones that really worked hard to get where they are.

And in a depression the AA hires will be the last to go. Team satanic Inversion will burn the world down before they ever again concede to a white patriarchal normosexual Christian power structure.

I just don't see how the math adds up there - corporate debt is at a record % of GDP and bills have to get paid. How can zombie corporations make profits and pay interest on their debts if they have to drag around the albatross of underperforming and drama creating workers? Not to mention many of these corporations like Apple are facing growing competition from abroad, though others like AT&T primarily operating domestically exist in oligopolies so may be able to collude their way to survive in the short term. Either way we will have to pay the price for the debt bubble and the unproductive should theoretically be sacrificed.
 

Rush87

Hummingbird
Arado said:
Leonard D Neubache said:
A lot of mediocre women have been sucked up into the upper levels of corporate life in the last 20 years just through affirmative action. It's somewhat like a lesser version of the lottery with smaller, more numerous prizes.

The upshot of AA is that it's become impossible to presume that any woman or minority has earned their place which is surely extremely depressing for the ones that really worked hard to get where they are.

And in a depression the AA hires will be the last to go. Team satanic Inversion will burn the world down before they ever again concede to a white patriarchal normosexual Christian power structure.

I just don't see how the math adds up there - corporate debt is at a record % of GDP and bills have to get paid. How can zombie corporations make profits and pay interest on their debts if they have to drag around the albatross of underperforming and drama creating workers? Not to mention many of these corporations like Apple are facing growing competition from abroad, though others like AT&T primarily operating domestically exist in oligopolies so may be able to collude their way to survive in the short term. Either way we will have to pay the price for the debt bubble and the unproductive should theoretically be sacrificed.

It's cheaper. Women double the workforce. They create downward pressure on wages due to demand. Where one man completed one task for 100k, two women complete the same task for 50k. The company grows, they have larger tax breaks and due to demand, they can squeeze more hours out of their employees. Corporations advocating for mass immigration follows the same premise.​
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
Arado said:
Leonard D Neubache said:
A lot of mediocre women have been sucked up into the upper levels of corporate life in the last 20 years just through affirmative action. It's somewhat like a lesser version of the lottery with smaller, more numerous prizes.

The upshot of AA is that it's become impossible to presume that any woman or minority has earned their place which is surely extremely depressing for the ones that really worked hard to get where they are.

And in a depression the AA hires will be the last to go. Team satanic Inversion will burn the world down before they ever again concede to a white patriarchal normosexual Christian power structure.

I just don't see how the math adds up there - corporate debt is at a record % of GDP and bills have to get paid. How can zombie corporations make profits and pay interest on their debts if they have to drag around the albatross of underperforming and drama creating workers? Not to mention many of these corporations like Apple are facing growing competition from abroad, though others like AT&T primarily operating domestically exist in oligopolies so may be able to collude their way to survive in the short term. Either way we will have to pay the price for the debt bubble and the unproductive should theoretically be sacrificed.

I obviously can't prove it but I believe the free market is more or less a complete illusion in the sense that the masters of these corporations supposedly languishing under all these debts are the same ones issuing that debt from the banks in the first place and so they'll just string the process along for as long as they like. Moreover international competition is no threat whatsoever to the current powers running the ZOG empire as we've seen with Huawei. To whatever insignificant degree foreign markets interfere with their plans they can call up their bought-and-paid-for congressmen and simply have that competition tariffed/regulated into oblivion or straight up banned from doing business. They're railing against China because China represents one of the last bastions of resistance to total global control for them (it seems anyway) but China is no threat locally.

To come to grips with the basic reality of the situation you have to realise that way back in 1950 most Western families had a car and a house on one salary. Production per capita due to technology has increased such that it takes 10 percent of the workforce it used to in order to provide for those basic needs. That is to say a 1950's level of wealth could be provided with a 90% male unemployment rate and a 100% female unemployment rate. How did we go from increasing our productive output tenfold and doubling the workforce participation rate only to be in real terms worse off per family? Well it stands to reason that there are a shitload of people doing meaningless make-work both in the public and private sector, and if push comes to shove then the make-work will be cancelled, the globohomo faithful will keep their jobs and people like us will be left to starve on the streets.

Don't premise your future predictions on a forced return to sanity in the jobs market. The elites can well afford to starve you out, and you'll find out too late that they don't care in the slightest if a few corporations here and there go under. It's all just a shell game anyway, and if things get really bad they'll just yank another trillion dollars out of the public purse. It worked last time (when all those doomsday experts said it would fail spectacularly) and despite the dire predictions of those same people who keep being wrong year over year, there's no reason to believe it wont work again.
 

Harem Scarem

Sparrow
Gold Member
There's a funny meme showing the difference between the fantasy and the reality of the "cool wine aunts". Can't seem to find it now, but it's pretty spot-on.

I have a co-worker like this. Mid-40s. She has two cats and no kids. Although you never know with 40-something chicks nowadays, she doesn't seem to get much male attention, although she looks OK for her age, about a 5. She has suspicious amounts of money - suspiciously low for someone her age, that is. She was in the mid-tier of the labour market in her 20s and 30s, but never saved a penny, and at some point she was kicked all the way down to the entry-level rung. She hasn't seen much of the world. When she goes on holiday, she flies to Spanish beach destinations most of the time. Otherwise, she's in the country all the time because she wouldn't be able to pay the rent if she took even a week of unpaid holiday. She has a couple of friends from high school who are all in high-drama break-ups every couple of months. They go to festivals and pretend they're still fun and quirky young girls, but you can see the despair in their eyes. She spends a lot of time on the care of her parents who are in their 80s (so they had her when they were in their 40s), her dad is going senile.

This is a good thing by the way, that she's taking care of her parents! I don't judge her negatively for that at all. But it just goes to show that the reality is often nothing like the fantasy. "No commitments" - yeah, if you want your parents to stew in their own juices, or delegate this duty of care to your siblings. Otherwise, they will probably be more like my co-worker, living paycheck to paycheck, wondering what might have been, realising that you still have at least 25-30 years like this ahead of you, depending on how fast the government will raise the retirement age in the near future.

I don't doubt that opportunities like these do exist for women in the highest-functioning strata of society, with a bit of affirmative action thrown in. If she is already good-looking and takes good care of her body into her 40s, and if she has money to burn, then sure. But this will always be a tiny minority. To sell this aspiration to girls today is criminal. Purely statistically, most will never reach this state or anything near it. Even the ones that do will feel an emptiness, an absence. So many childless women in their 40s or older have told me outright, completely unprompted, what their biggest regret was. I know divorcees in their 50s and 60s who will never have a man in their lives again. Girls in their 20s may be signing up for this now, but they at least still have time to change course (or rather, have it changed for them by a man who knows how to lead). The ones making propaganda for this lifestyle are mainly miserable and dead inside, and they want to spread it towards those who still have life in them. They are basically zombies.

Merry Christmas!
 
RE: Dating culture falls even further: Women think it's cool to be a childless

Harem Scarem said:
There's a funny meme showing the difference between the fantasy and the reality of the "cool wine aunts". Can't seem to find it now, but it's pretty spot-on.

Merry Christmas to you all!

AHtAbqP.png
 

Arado

Pelican
Gold Member
Leonard D Neubache said:
Arado said:
Leonard D Neubache said:
A lot of mediocre women have been sucked up into the upper levels of corporate life in the last 20 years just through affirmative action. It's somewhat like a lesser version of the lottery with smaller, more numerous prizes.

The upshot of AA is that it's become impossible to presume that any woman or minority has earned their place which is surely extremely depressing for the ones that really worked hard to get where they are.

And in a depression the AA hires will be the last to go. Team satanic Inversion will burn the world down before they ever again concede to a white patriarchal normosexual Christian power structure.


I just don't see how the math adds up there - corporate debt is at a record % of GDP and bills have to get paid. How can zombie corporations make profits and pay interest on their debts if they have to drag around the albatross of underperforming and drama creating workers? Not to mention many of these corporations like Apple are facing growing competition from abroad, though others like AT&T primarily operating domestically exist in oligopolies so may be able to collude their way to survive in the short term. Either way we will have to pay the price for the debt bubble and the unproductive should theoretically be sacrificed.

I obviously can't prove it but I believe the free market is more or less a complete illusion in the sense that the masters of these corporations supposedly languishing under all these debts are the same ones issuing that debt from the banks in the first place and so they'll just string the process along for as long as they like. Moreover international competition is no threat whatsoever to the current powers running the ZOG empire as we've seen with Huawei. To whatever insignificant degree foreign markets interfere with their plans they can call up their bought-and-paid-for congressmen and simply have that competition tariffed/regulated into oblivion or straight up banned from doing business. They're railing against China because China represents one of the last bastions of resistance to total global control for them (it seems anyway) but China is no threat locally.

To come to grips with the basic reality of the situation you have to realise that way back in 1950 most Western families had a car and a house on one salary. Production per capita due to technology has increased such that it takes 10 percent of the workforce it used to in order to provide for those basic needs. That is to say a 1950's level of wealth could be provided with a 90% male unemployment rate and a 100% female unemployment rate. How did we go from increasing our productive output tenfold and doubling the workforce participation rate only to be in real terms worse off per family? Well it stands to reason that there are a shitload of people doing meaningless make-work both in the public and private sector, and if push comes to shove then the make-work will be cancelled, the globohomo faithful will keep their jobs and people like us will be left to starve on the streets.

Don't premise your future predictions on a forced return to sanity in the jobs market. The elites can well afford to starve you out, and you'll find out too late that they don't care in the slightest if a few corporations here and there go under. It's all just a shell game anyway, and if things get really bad they'll just yank another trillion dollars out of the public purse. It worked last time (when all those doomsday experts said it would fail spectacularly) and despite the dire predictions of those same people who keep being wrong year over year, there's no reason to believe it wont work again.

Thanks for the response. I don't want to get too off-topic from this thread, but this insight would be useful in the various economic collapse and investing threads spread throughout the forum. Even if our society can function without all these make-work jobs, there is still tremendous amounts of misallocated capital, talent, along with massive debt and trade deficits that have to be financed by someone. Most on the forum are predicting some type of crash between now and 2024 ish.

I really don't think your standard above average medium talent women will be able to escape the consequences of pursuing a purely hedonistic/materialistic lifestyle built on an edifice of cheap money and debt. But perhaps that's just wishful thinking and maybe this return to sanity won't come absent changes far more drastic than a market crash.
 

questor70

Ostrich
The larger issue is really a spiritual one. What is it do you want to get out of life? Most people start off at adulthood programmed by received wisdom. That's what blue-pill thinking represents, not just for men, but you can think of it across the board. The dominant culture defines "blue pill" thinking. Do this, that, and the other thing and magically you'll be "happy". Almost universally we discover that all that glitters is not gold.

I'm going out on a limb here but I think it's overly simplistic to blanket prescribe "marriage and children" to women as a one-size-fits-all panacea for female depression and existential dread. Once you figure out human biology you'll see we were sort of programmed to some extent by instinct to do things at certain life stages and to have some vague notion that this or that is the route to happiness, only for the rug to get pulled out from under us. Yes, I'm talking about the seven year itch phenomenon, or more appropriately, the pattern of falling in love, getting married, watching the passion fade and then these women are left in a sexless and loveless marriage full of obligations with stretch-marks, droopy boobs, and an endless stream of parental responsibilities.

So it's really not the case that there are only two groups of women, those who "lock down" a husband and have kids and settle into happily ever after vs. the proverbial wine-aunt cat lady who is miserable for being alone. There are PLENTY of women who got what they THOUGHT they wanted before the wall and/or menopause crept up on them, only to STILL be miserable. Sure, they aren't literally alone. Maybe they have kids and the most rudimentary sense of purpose. But they aren't...truly...happy. I would say women tend to approach life-goals in a very cold and calculating way only to realize that merely ticking boxes doesn't accomplish the life-satisfaction they thought it would. They satisfy their biological programming and little else.

Happiness is more elusive than the marriage+kids/no-marriage question.
 

Hermetic Seal

Kingfisher
Gold Member
The pursuit of happiness inevitably results in disappointment because happiness is fleeting. Pursuing a purpose is a more substantial goal because you can be working toward something significant without feeling blissfully unhappy all the time.

Unfortunately, our corporate overlords don't like this because when you're not chasing the ephemeral vanity-vapors of happiness you're less likely to serve the economy by buying loads of dumb crap you don't need.
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
^This right here.

If for instance you boiled down military service as a true believer to "eat shitty food, always get told what to do then march off to get shot at and maybe die" then you would presume that nobody is happy being in the military ergo they need to start adding clowns and ball pits and balloon animals or nobody is going to enlist anymore.

If your parents chose the happiness formula that didn't involve childbirth, changing shitty nappies and feeding a screaming blob of humanity every 3 hours, 24 hours a day for months and months then you wouldn't exist.

At some point you have to take it on faith that these things have rewards that cannot be measured in simple endorphin spikes.
 

AntoniusofEfa

Kingfisher
Leonard D Neubache said:
A lot of mediocre women have been sucked up into the upper levels of corporate life in the last 20 years just through affirmative action. It's somewhat like a lesser version of the lottery with smaller, more numerous prizes.

The upshot of AA is that it's become impossible to presume that any woman or minority has earned their place which is surely extremely depressing for the ones that really worked hard to get where they are.

And in a depression the AA hires will be the last to go. Team satanic Inversion will burn the world down before they ever again concede to a white patriarchal normosexual Christian power structure.

Companies that want to get something done hire contractors. The pay in the in demand areas is excellent, both in the US and Europe (compared to Eu salaries). Everyone in the tech sector worth their salt know by now that a manager without a real tech background (like most women managers are) are best to be treated like an office plant.
 
D said:
Merry Christmas to you all!
AHtAbqP.png

This is funny. I'm not sure how many here have read Blackdragon's blog. It's hard to get on board with some of his ideas, as he advocates non-monogamous relationships (where the woman can sleep with other men, too -- yuck!). However, some of his observations are on point. He has written about "provider hunters," which are women (most often over age 27) on a hardcore search for a betabux.

The cartoon captures this type of woman perfectly, particularly the anger. I love that sourpuss look on her face. A sample:

A short temper during the dating process is a very clear sign of a provider hunter. Why?

Because provider hunters hate dating. They hate going on dating sites, they hate going out on dates, they hate sexual interplay with a man who is not her boyfriend, they hate it all. Dating is a huge hassle to these women. She doesn’t want to date, she wants to be married, or at least have a super-serious boyfriend. Dating “sucks”. And dammit, men need to “get it together”.

As a result, if anything doesn’t go her way during the dating process, she’ll be snippy at best, outright bitchy at worst. Remember, she’s already pissed off that she has to “date”. (You can even see this anger in their online dating profiles.) So if you do anything “wrong” in her eyes, or don’t measure up to her checklist, you’re going to get some bile.
 

SlickyBoy

Hummingbird
TL;DR

Leonard D Neubache said:
I obviously can't prove it but I believe the free market is more or less a complete illusion (True) in the sense that the masters of these corporations supposedly languishing under all these debts are the same ones issuing that debt from the banks in the first place and so they'll just string the process along for as long as they like. Moreover international competition is no threat whatsoever to the current powers running the ZOG empire as we've seen with Huawei. To whatever insignificant degree foreign markets interfere with their plans they can call up their bought-and-paid-for congressmen and simply have that competition tariffed/regulated into oblivion or straight up banned from doing business. They're railing against China because China represents one of the last bastions of resistance to total global control for them (it seems anyway) but China is no threat locally.

To come to grips with the basic reality of the situation you have to realise that way back in 1950 most Western families had a car and a house on one salary. Production per capita due to technology has increased such that it takes 10 percent of the workforce it used to in order to provide for those basic needs. That is to say a 1950's level of wealth could be provided with a 90% male unemployment rate and a 100% female unemployment rate. How did we go from increasing our productive output tenfold and doubling the workforce participation rate only to be in real terms worse off per family? Well it stands to reason that there are a shitload of people doing meaningless make-work both in the public and private sector, and if push comes to shove then the make-work will be cancelled, the globohomo faithful will keep their jobs and people like us will be left to starve on the streets.

Don't premise your future predictions on a forced return to sanity in the jobs market. The elites can well afford to starve you out, and you'll find out too late that they don't care in the slightest if a few corporations here and there go under. It's all just a shell game anyway, and if things get really bad they'll just yank another trillion dollars out of the public purse. It worked last time (when all those doomsday experts said it would fail spectacularly) and despite the dire predictions of those same people who keep being wrong year over year, there's no reason to believe it wont work again.

TL;DR: Capitalism is state sponsored usury and we are witnessing the inevitable results of that system.


But I would top short of saying China is no threat locally. They're probably going to beat us to quantum computing, Huawei is getting on board with 5G faster than anyone else and their population is more likely to produce and lacks the boat anchor of wallowing in post-WW2 guilt trips, affirmative action and race-hustling.

They position themselves to conquer the world while we send our kids to surf in Costa Rica to "find themselves" for four years after graduating with worthless degrees and 100k in student debt. They accept no "refugees" while we let in hordes of cost ineffective personnel from incompatible cultures, riding on the coat tails of giants. They value traditions; we've had ours ripped out from under us. We engage in wars for oligarchs in places that don't matter; China lets us be the patsies and moves in economically before the dust settles.

China has its problems, but they play the long game and have for thousands of years. No tribe of shady shysters with chips on their shoulders will ever manipulate them away from that kind of learning experience.


--> and yeah, know of plenty of women in the late 20s-early 30s age group who openly declare that "dating blows" with some sense of resentment and entitlement directed to their beta bux who hasn't shown up yet. Poor bastards who step up to that attitude will be divorced within 10 years after the arrival of the first child.
 
Women don't think that just as soy-boy feminist men are not more attractive than dominant Alpha chads.

It's one of the countless ways of pretending that their shit-sandwich tastes like angus-beef burger.

They come home to cry over a bottle of wine in their 40s with empty sadness remaining in their 50s, commiting suicide by over-medication in their 60s.
 
Top