Defeating Islam Megathread
- Thread starter aphelion
- Start date
Sherman said:
Are they Muslims, dear?
And come on now, you can provide your personal preference about whether you want Muslim refugees in the same country as you.
Best long term solution is preaching the Gospel among them. So that even when they are expelled from the west they can escape the death cult and to reduce pool of jihadists.
Is this a good strategy to defeat Radical Islam? That's too many police to handle just one person.
syrianguy said:
The left already has a religion of sorts, of which feminism is a big part. There's much more that can be done to show Islam is bad for feminist goals. At the moment, Muslims are on top of the victim hierarchy but with the right activism (not from us), that could change. It would just take a small group of feminists to lead the way and break with political correctness. For these purposes, the more insane they are, the better.
Elsewhere on the forum which would be preferable, living under an Islamic state or a feminist one. Personally, I'd take the latter. Or cancer.
The broader approach is the correct one. No policy will be enacted if there's no political will behind it from the populace or too much static from the traitors.
I mentioned it all too briefly in the #collaborators thread and it bears repeating. Women crave social acceptance and safety. #Collaborators must be marked as pariahs and traitors. They must be heckled and made to feel unsafe.
When that happens then women (the majority of collaborators) will hamster up a reason that they've "changed their minds" and will swing around to the right. We're already seeing this in some instances.
Once the women swing then the herbs and the soy will quietly follow, for what it's even worth at that point.
People in these hot spots are going to realise that if they try to swing the female populace with only the carrot and not the stick then they're wasting their time.
Denounce the invaders.
Intimidate the collaborators.
All enemies of western civilisation can be relegated to one of these two groups.
I mentioned it all too briefly in the #collaborators thread and it bears repeating. Women crave social acceptance and safety. #Collaborators must be marked as pariahs and traitors. They must be heckled and made to feel unsafe.
When that happens then women (the majority of collaborators) will hamster up a reason that they've "changed their minds" and will swing around to the right. We're already seeing this in some instances.
Once the women swing then the herbs and the soy will quietly follow, for what it's even worth at that point.
People in these hot spots are going to realise that if they try to swing the female populace with only the carrot and not the stick then they're wasting their time.
Denounce the invaders.
Intimidate the collaborators.
All enemies of western civilisation can be relegated to one of these two groups.
Sherman said:
Again, dear: are the Haitian refugees Muslims? You don't get out of answering by going with avoiding giving one.
And you still haven't answered Leonard's, and my, question: would you want Muslim refugees living in the same country as you?
infowarrior1 said:
They've been trying that for roughly 1400 years. You're seeing the results of that approach.
The problem -- and also the reason why I'm sure a lot of "Muslims" are not, actually, Muslims but a wishy-washy, secular aping of it -- is that the penalty for leaving Islam ("apostasy") is death. This applies both to converts to Christianity or atheists. A former Muslim going back to the Middle East is essentially a dead Muslim if he dares tell anyone, or is seen telling anyone, that Jesus is the Son of God.
Paracelsus said:
You did it again. I'm sure you didn't mean it. But when you hang around somebody a lot you pick up their mannerisms. You need to have a friend record you on his cellphone so you can check to make sure you aren't swishing your fanny when you walk.
Sherman said:
And for the third time, darling: are the Haitian refugees Muslims, and would you want Muslim refugees living in the same country as you?
LEMONed IScream
Ostrich
Ah. Heterosexual men need to be led by other heterosexual men...
Leadership eh. That says a lot about the leaders in Islam, since it has been well recorded that these powerful and infinitely rich men use a portion of their money to shit on whores. No wonder the rest of the Islamic world isn't really that innovative.
Leadership eh. That says a lot about the leaders in Islam, since it has been well recorded that these powerful and infinitely rich men use a portion of their money to shit on whores. No wonder the rest of the Islamic world isn't really that innovative.
Paracelsus said:
Perhaps something changed in the current era but it appears that death for apostasy is not deterring many thousands of them from turning to the faith:
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/0...ortedly-turning-to-christ-in-middle-east.html
And then there are reports of visions of Jesus helping that:
https://www.opendoorsusa.org/christ...turn-to-christ-in-unprecedented-numbers-pt-1/
So the situation in the middle east is not hopeless. Current communications like the internet and TV is opening many of them to the message which previously such did not exist in the past 1400 years.
delete
Goes to show the potential and power of Patriarchy. Just because a woman is "unemployed'' doesn't mean she isn't employed as a wife and mother keeping house and raising children and providing value that is not easily measured in $$$'s. Social capital they have in abundance compared to much of the decadent west.
Ultraorthodox Haredi also have similar rates of fertility and high social capital.
Sherman said:
otd:Nail on the head. The angst and frustration shows that many on here just aren't getting laid. A couple of years ago you guys were blaming women for your problems, but now it's the Muslims who are on the receiving end of your ire. Give it over. A thread entitled 'Defeating Islam Megathread' is just dumb. How do you defeat a religion that has over a billion worshippers. I'm sure many in the Muslim community are shitting themselves because a few sexually frustrated and angry Alt-Righters are waging their own jihad online from their own laptops. FFS, get off the computers, go out and get laid. Don't be starting dumb threads like this.
By declaring your own jihad against Islam, you are also declaring war against Assad, the SAA, Hezbollah, Iran and many moderate Sunnis who not only are condemning the crazies, but are also fighting them. Think about that. Use the brain cells. Our enemy is not Islam, it's Islamism, funded, armed and exported from Saudi Arabia. If you want to tackle Islamism, I mentioned a number of ways to do it in a previous thread.
https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-63079-post-1584765.html#pid1584765
But hey! we all know that aint going to happen as long as God Emperor Trump is selling the Saudis arms by the plane load, oversees the new Saudi anti-terrorism centre (the irony) and declares that Iran is the 'enemy'. :tard:
Get off your computers, go out and get laid.
I wrote about the topics in length already before. Essentially we would have first to defeat the globalists, then tackle the problem of Islam. This would be done by supporting the secularists and Islamic reformers. Yes - I would prefer a total disappearance of Islam, but that might happen anyway over time.
I might also offer this one note - if I was emperor of the world, then I would do the following to deal with the Muslim issue:
+ of course stop all aggressive wars against Muslim states
+ stop Muslim immigration to West full stop
+ start teaching about Islam in detail in school, universities, TV programs - done by scholars, Ex-Muslims Ex-Salafis, dissecting the entire religion word for word, true brutal history, Quran told up and down from early peaceful verses to violent last 13 years and abrogation taugh, Hadiths told - all the gore and blood and guts
+ crack down super-hard on all Islamists - all the ones on the watchlist - I would have a special solution for them. Those that cannot be deported would be in a relatively luxurious detainment center with lots of green spaces, books, TV and internet. They get social security anyway - not having to spy on them and paying for their brats is good enough for me.
+ Deport everyone possible
+ support secular Islamic leaders like Assad full throttle - he would be given 200.000 troops on the ground if necessary
+ support secular leaders and Islamic reformers with hundreds of billions of dollars, even military aid
+ over time topple all Islamic republics and help hoist ethical strongmen onto power (finding ethical ones is not that difficult, but the globalists don't test for ethics - I would and trust me, it is not that difficult - the globalists don't test for it, because most of them are psychopaths anyway and dealing with other psychos serves them better)
This would likely result in:
+ slight increase of terror in short-term, but tremendous decrease of terror in the long-term, also those that would stay in the West would behave
+ massive secularization of Muslims in West and in home countries
+ huge increase of Ex-Muslims - people leaving that shitty cult like no tomorrow (you would also have full teaching of Islam also on all Muslim channels - that is super-easy to control - many Muslims would find out how wonderful Mohammed truly was)
+ rise in IQs due to decrease of inbreeding in Muslim countries
+ rise in IQs due to pregnant women not fasting during Ramadan and getting high-quality prenatal care and supplements
+ rising prosperity all around since as world-emperor I would issue interest-free money with demurrage so most people would have way more cash and work opportunity
+ release all the suppressed technologies which would also improve life quality everywhere
+ work on improving living standards everywhere in nation states that are more similar in terms of language, ethnicity, culture - not try to fucking mix people when they are too different or pump millions into countries in order to wipe out cultures and tribes - before I accept one refugee I would give 10 poor people in the host country debit cards and cash in their own places - it is still cheaper than pulling them over to West
But this will never come about.
The globalists want war with Islam and have been running a strategy of supporting radicals while at the same time claiming that Islam will coexist in the West. It won't - their plans only make sense for one of 2 goals:
1) World War III with Islam and then One World Government
2) Orwellian super-surveillance state with everyone on Earth getting chipped and thus One World Government
I see no other reason why this strategy makes any sense. The Muslim apologists and propagandists also work for the Globalists (those that are aware of the plans and not the ones like Sherman). The secular Muslim reformers are on our side, but they will not succeed. If the globalists wanted that to succeed, then they would have helped the Persian Shah, left Saddam in place, hoisted one of Gaddafi's highly secular sons into power, left Assad in peace, essentially had done the opposite of what they did. Instead they help ISIS, but the ideology of ISIS is pure Islam, the converts there are not all CIA agents, most of them are true believers and ISIS is Islam = 100% sharia.
I might also offer this one note - if I was emperor of the world, then I would do the following to deal with the Muslim issue:
+ of course stop all aggressive wars against Muslim states
+ stop Muslim immigration to West full stop
+ start teaching about Islam in detail in school, universities, TV programs - done by scholars, Ex-Muslims Ex-Salafis, dissecting the entire religion word for word, true brutal history, Quran told up and down from early peaceful verses to violent last 13 years and abrogation taugh, Hadiths told - all the gore and blood and guts
+ crack down super-hard on all Islamists - all the ones on the watchlist - I would have a special solution for them. Those that cannot be deported would be in a relatively luxurious detainment center with lots of green spaces, books, TV and internet. They get social security anyway - not having to spy on them and paying for their brats is good enough for me.
+ Deport everyone possible
+ support secular Islamic leaders like Assad full throttle - he would be given 200.000 troops on the ground if necessary
+ support secular leaders and Islamic reformers with hundreds of billions of dollars, even military aid
+ over time topple all Islamic republics and help hoist ethical strongmen onto power (finding ethical ones is not that difficult, but the globalists don't test for ethics - I would and trust me, it is not that difficult - the globalists don't test for it, because most of them are psychopaths anyway and dealing with other psychos serves them better)
This would likely result in:
+ slight increase of terror in short-term, but tremendous decrease of terror in the long-term, also those that would stay in the West would behave
+ massive secularization of Muslims in West and in home countries
+ huge increase of Ex-Muslims - people leaving that shitty cult like no tomorrow (you would also have full teaching of Islam also on all Muslim channels - that is super-easy to control - many Muslims would find out how wonderful Mohammed truly was)
+ rise in IQs due to decrease of inbreeding in Muslim countries
+ rise in IQs due to pregnant women not fasting during Ramadan and getting high-quality prenatal care and supplements
+ rising prosperity all around since as world-emperor I would issue interest-free money with demurrage so most people would have way more cash and work opportunity
+ release all the suppressed technologies which would also improve life quality everywhere
+ work on improving living standards everywhere in nation states that are more similar in terms of language, ethnicity, culture - not try to fucking mix people when they are too different or pump millions into countries in order to wipe out cultures and tribes - before I accept one refugee I would give 10 poor people in the host country debit cards and cash in their own places - it is still cheaper than pulling them over to West
But this will never come about.
The globalists want war with Islam and have been running a strategy of supporting radicals while at the same time claiming that Islam will coexist in the West. It won't - their plans only make sense for one of 2 goals:
1) World War III with Islam and then One World Government
2) Orwellian super-surveillance state with everyone on Earth getting chipped and thus One World Government
I see no other reason why this strategy makes any sense. The Muslim apologists and propagandists also work for the Globalists (those that are aware of the plans and not the ones like Sherman). The secular Muslim reformers are on our side, but they will not succeed. If the globalists wanted that to succeed, then they would have helped the Persian Shah, left Saddam in place, hoisted one of Gaddafi's highly secular sons into power, left Assad in peace, essentially had done the opposite of what they did. Instead they help ISIS, but the ideology of ISIS is pure Islam, the converts there are not all CIA agents, most of them are true believers and ISIS is Islam = 100% sharia.
sterling_archer
Hummingbird
1) and 2) are reasons why that HIV conspiracy mentioned is probably not legit.