Defeating Islam Megathread

Papaya

Peacock
Gold Member
Sherman said:
My advice is to give it up and go back to game. Driving a car is still far more dangerous than terrorism. If a billion Muslims weren't overwhelmingly peaceful then we really would be in trouble. Muslims are being killed by these nut jobs also.

If they were overwhelmingly peaceful they wouldn't be trying to leave their overwhelmingly peaceful ancestral homes by the tens of thousands

Sherman said:
Its a geopolitical problem beyond our control and we can't solve it.

Yes we can. First step is to isolate and limit the geopolitical problem to it's geo location point of origin...IE...dont import the problem

It's the ideology's orthodoxy that's the cause of the problem. That cant be "fixed" over night but the effects of said cause can certainly be minimized by intelligent patriotic leadership
 

YossariansRight

Ostrich
Gold Member
I think of the Mohammedans being "welcomed" into civilization the same way as the aliens in the "Alien" movies, especially in the movie where "The Company" bred them in an attempt to train and control them.

Of course the aliens had none of that, rampaged and killed their "benefactors".

Sound familiar???
 

YossariansRight

Ostrich
Gold Member
Interesting how the Mohammedans on RVF try do their damnest to hide that pesky fact, huh?

Where's that goat fucking, mass murdering, totalitarian, pedo pride?
 

heavy

Hummingbird
Gold Member
The lack of surprise and news-worthiness is nauseous to me.

I don't watch tv, and I have a life on the weekends. This weekend I didn't happen to pull up my twitter, so I didn't know about the London attacks until this morning.

Even Drudge has Cosby as his main story with picture. The terrorist attack headlines are informational and have already lost the shock value.

It's an uneasy day when we're becoming used to terrorist attacks.
 

Papaya

Peacock
Gold Member
heavy said:
The lack of surprise and news-worthiness is nauseous to me.

I don't watch tv, and I have a life on the weekends. This weekend I didn't happen to pull up my twitter, so I didn't know about the London attacks until this morning.

Even Drudge has Cosby as his main story with picture. The terrorist attack headlines are informational and have already lost the shock value.

It's an uneasy day when we're becoming used to terrorist attacks.

Ive said the media is complicit

Ive been wondering: . What would happen if the MSM was NOT allowed to report terror attacks anymore? (I know it's not realistic for a number of reasons)

But: What if?

What would happen if the all the high profile "glory" was removed from the equation?

My theory is that if we were to somehow change the status of these jihadists from high profile front page,breaking news, "martyrs" to trivial page 12 "crackpot" then it would greatly reduce the motivation to carry this shit out.
 

Paracelsus

Crow
Gold Member
YossariansRight said:
I think of the Mohammedans being "welcomed" into civilization the same way as the aliens in the "Alien" movies, especially in the movie where "The Company" bred them in an attempt to train and control them.

Of course the aliens had none of that, rampaged and killed their "benefactors".

Sound familiar???

C1Gi8UYXcAACYm0.jpg


Burke: [about the jihadis] Look, those two sandcrabs are worth millions to the cultural enrichment division. Now, if you're smart, we can both come out of it as heroes and we'll be set up for life.

Ripley: You're crazy Burke, you know that? You really think that you can get a dangerous terrorist like that past ICE quarantine?

Burke: How can they deport it if they don't know about it?

Ripley: Oh, they *will* know about it, Burke, from me. Just like they'll know that you were responsible for the deflowering of 158 goats here.

Burke: Wait a second...

Ripley: You sent them to that mosque.

Burke: You're wrong.

Ripley: I just checked the colony log. Dated 0-6-1-2-7-9, signed Burke, Carter J. You sent them out there and you didn't even warn them. Why didn't you warn them, Burke?

Burke: Okay, look. What if that mosque didn't even exist, huh? Did you ever think about that? I didn't know! So now, if I went in and made a major security issue out of it, everybody steps in. Trump steps in, and there are no exclusive rights for anybody; nobody wins. So I made a decision and it was... wrong. It was a bad call, Ripley. It was a bad call.

Ripley: Bad call?

[Ripley grabs Burke by his vest and shoves him against a wall]

Ripley: These goats have been fucked, Burke! Don't you have any idea what you have done here? Well, I'm gonna make sure they nail you right to the wall for this! You're not gonna sleaze your way out of this one! Right to the wall!

[Ripley lets go of Burke]

Burke: Ripley...! You know, I... I expected more from you. I thought you'd be smarter than this.

Ripley: I'm happy to disappoint you.

[Ripley leaves]
 
iop890 said:
YossariansRight said:
Where that goat fucking, mass murdering, totalitarian pride?

You forgot kid-fucking.

Show some pride my mufa’khathat loving brothers.

Homosexuality was and is widely practised in Islamic countries. To please the homosexuals among his followers he promised them pre-pubescent boys in Paradise. So after committing plunder, loot, rape and murder in this life, the followers of Islam get "rewarded" by untouched virginal youths who are fresh like pearls.

(QURAN 52:24): "And there will go round boy-servants of theirs, to serve them as if they were preserved pearls."

(QURAN 56:17): "They will be served by immortal boys."

(QURAN 76:19): "And round about them will (serve) boys of everlasting youth. If you see them, you would think them scattered pearls."

So not only will the glorious martyr get 72 virgins, but have immortal little boys serve him with their tight butt-holes. Sounds like a wonderful heaven.

“I stood by the gate of Hell and saw that most of those who entered (it) were women.” [Bukhaaree & Muslim, via Usaamah Ibn Zayd]

Because they (women) are ungrateful to their husbands

The prophet (aw) said;

“O women, give in charity, for I have seen that you form the majority of the people of Hell.”

Since most women go to hell anyway, then I wonder who the 72 virgins are - probably some kind of artificial creations or martyred virgins and little boys who get rewarded for their suffering by having to serve a demented Jihadi for eternity.

It is really sad in a way.
 

TigerMandingo

 
Banned
Traktor said:
But hey! we all know that aint going to happen as long as God Emperor Trump is selling the Saudis arms by the plane load, oversees the new Saudi anti-terrorism centre (the irony) and declares that Iran is the 'enemy'. :tard:

Guys here don't want to hear it, but Islamic attacks on the US/UK will continue as long as these two countries fuck around in the ME and support Israel. Shit, even the neo-conish think tank Cato Institute agrees.

https://www.cato.org/publications/f...on-overseas-breed-terrorism-historical-record

Whenever there is a terrorist attack in Russia, no one there goes around asking "why are they doing this?" It's well understood that obliterating Chechnya while killing tens of thousands in the process created this problem. Sure, no one likes Islam or Chechens much, but still.
 
Which Middle Eastern countries did Thailand, Philippines and China invade?
Which Middle Eastern countries did the US invade when the Barbary Muslim pirates took the early US navy ships and sold the crew into slavery?
Which Middle Eastern country did the Christians invade from 700 to 1600 AD (except for notable exceptions of the crusades which were actually responsive campaigns).

This bullshit of "we will treat Islam nicely and it will treat us nicely" is an absolute and total misnomer. Yeah - it gives quick reason to do so, but even with zero meddling this would be going on since Islam commands Muslims to wage Jihad on all unbelievers until the entire world is Muslim:



Though of course the globalists meddle, they meddle everywhere, but not everyone descends into chaos after they have been bombed and nuked like some other countries in wars - i.e. Germany, Japan, even Vietnam.
 

loremipsum

Kingfisher
bbgun said:
DBhCKWEWAAAjpwb-768x489.jpg


Ho-lee shit. We are doomed.

Nothing new under the sun.

Check at 1:50 . How many more dead children until we start questioning if we should allow mental people like Katy Perry to vote I wonder.
 
loremipsum said:
Nothing new under the sun.

Check at 1:50 . How many more dead children until we start questioning if we should allow mental people like Katy Perry to vote I wonder.

Did not know who that little vocal-fry boy was.

Katy Perry - you are not pretty enough to pull off a lesbian haircut. Instantly dropped 2 points:
Katy-Perry--1280x720.jpg


As for her statements - love one another will indeed work out well.
 

Meadowlark

Hummingbird
Gold Member
loremipsum said:
bbgun said:
snip

Ho-lee shit. We are doomed.

Nothing new under the sun.
video snip

Check at 1:50 . How many more dead children until we start questioning if we should allow mental people like Katy Perry to vote I wonder.



2 great examples of why women should never have been allowed to vote, and why we need to take that away ASAP!
 

Chavo

 
Banned
I'm sorry to say, but if you look throughout history, the only way you defeat anything is by invasion and conquest. The way the Spanish did in the Americas in the 1500s, the way Napoleon did in the 1700s and the way Hitler did during World War 2.

For the west to prevail they will either have to go to the Muslim countries and conquer the territories. Then you force the population to convert to Christianity or die, the way the Spanish did to the Aztecs.

I see no other way. Can we live peacefully with the Muslim world? I don't know. But if you want to go that route, you will have to put more pressure on Saudi Arabia to fight Islamic terrorists all over the middle east. The holy city of Mecca is in Saudi Arabia. Holy ground for Muslims and extremists. The fact that Trump is over there doing business with the Saudis and not putting them on his Muslim travel ban is mind boggling to me, but that's another story.

Convert or die! Beat them in their own game.
 

Rocha

Ostrich
Gold Member
Zelcorpion said:
Which Middle Eastern countries did Thailand, Philippines and China invade?
Which Middle Eastern countries did the US invade when the Barbary Muslim pirates took the early US navy ships and sold the crew into slavery?
Which Middle Eastern country did the Christians invade from 700 to 1600 AD (except for notable exceptions of the crusades which were actually responsive campaigns).

Well...in fact the Portuguese Empire did invade countless of them ))

We should have raised everything to the ground though, Mecca included.

South Asia, Persian Gulf and Red Sea[edit]
The Portuguese empire expanded into the Persian Gulf, contesting control of the spice trade with the Ajuran Empire and the Ottoman Empire. In 1515, Afonso de Albuquerque conquered the Huwala state of Hormuz at the head of the Persian Gulf, establishing it as a vassal state. Aden, however, resisted Albuquerque's expedition in that same year and another attempt by Albuquerque's successor Lopo Soares de Albergaria in 1516. In 1521 a force led by António Correia captured Bahrain, defeating the Jabrid King, Muqrin ibn Zamil.[78] In a shifting series of alliances, the Portuguese dominated much of the southern Persian Gulf for the next hundred years. With the regular maritime route linking Lisbon to Goa since 1497, the island of Mozambique became a strategic port, and there was built Fort São Sebastião and a hospital. In the Azores, the Islands Armada protected the ships en route to Lisbon.[79]

In 1534, Gujarat faced attack from the Mughals and the Rajput states of Chitor and Mandu. The Sultan Bahadur Shah of Gujarat was forced to sign the Treaty of Bassein with the Portuguese, establishing an alliance to regain the country, giving in exchange Daman, Diu, Mumbai and Bassein. It also regulated the trade of Gujarati ships departing to the Red Sea and passing through Bassein to pay duties and allow the horse trade.[80] After Mughal ruler Humayun had success against Bahadur, the latter signed another treaty with the Portuguese to confirm the provisions and allowed the fort to be built in Diu. Shortly afterward, Humayun turned his attention elsewhere, and the Gujarats allied with the Ottomans to regain control of Diu and lay siege to the fort. The two failed sieges of 1538 and 1546 put an end to Ottoman ambitions, confirming the Portuguese hegemony in the region,[80][81] as well as gaining superiority over the Mughals.[82] However, the Ottomans fought off attacks from the Portuguese in the Red Sea and in the Sinai Peninsula in 1541, and in the northern region of the Persian Gulf in 1546 and 1552. Each entity ultimately had to respect the sphere of influence of the other, albeit unofficially.[83][84]
 

The Beast1

Peacock
Orthodox Inquirer
Gold Member
At this rate, it looks like Islam will simply kill themselves off.

Though i'm more worried about what rises out of the ashes once that happens.
 
Top