That's not a direct quote. I should be more clear.
Spooner said of the US Constitution:
I'm not a libertarian anymore but in terms of accepting reality I found it an extremely interesting point of view and have since adapted it as an acid test for whether something is true or whether I simply want it to be true.
Hence my personal bastardization of it in the previous post. A thing is what it is and delivers what it delivers. Christianity has been gutted by the globojewish cartels and regardless of whether we think that's good or fair it's a fact. Even if we hit the reset button then the same story would simply play out over and over again, the reason being when you combine an open universalist faith with a peoples inclined toward empathy and good-will then they will inevitably be raped by hostile parasitic subversives. It's as inevitable as the sun rising and setting. Regardless of what we want to believe, "either Christianity has brought us to where we are now or been powerless to prevent it".
The last hundred years especially has shown us that any form of politics or national policy must lean heavily towards exclusivity and much like the Jewish that exclusivity must be baked into the core of that foundation such that to extricate it would be to destroy everything upon which it was built.
Christianity does not offer this exclusivity. Even among the orthodox there is little appetite to turn away a million Somalians who simply make the right noises about conversion for as long as it takes to gain citizenship in that country. The orthodox are the strongest shield in the Christian shield wall and even they are apparently powerless to do much but attempt to close their gates and weather the storm, which will see them end up much like the Ukranians under the Holmodor.
And what will they say as they're being rounded up? "If God wills it, I meet Him with a clear conscience and penitence in my heart".
I remain unconvinced of any system of ideology being capable of protecting most whites from their own stupidity but I absolutely understand why many are turning back to paganism. At least it venerates the survival of the bloodline even if by accepting the law of the jungle.
Moreover I have come to accept that the only reason Christian armies ever held or retook their lands in the past was because the elites driving them were local elites acting in their own local interests. Christianity may have given war a sheen of spiritual legitimacy but to suggest that Christ and those who came after him would have headed a ten-thousand man army marching to sack cities and kill the invading hordes by the thousand is fanciful at best.
The reason Christianity has collapsed as a bulwark against foreign invasion is simple.
The elites are no longer local but global, so instead of calling to local Christianity and local Christians to fight off the foreign elites attempting to take their wealth, they only see Christians now as an impediment to further their agendas. That is to say if back during the crusades the European elites got a better offer from Islam then we'd either never have been born or we'd be speaking arabic at best.
Christianity in and of itself has little to no defence against direct attack and replacement or rapid subversion. Any defence or restoration of Western nations will go around Christianity or trample over the top of it. It's already clear that the vast majority of Christian institutions support globalism without reservation and that their flock are either fully supportive or unwilling to rock the boat in relevant numbers. Of the tiny number of institutions that resist globalism none appear willing take the measures necessary to win.
It is what it is.
Spooner said of the US Constitution:
I'm not a libertarian anymore but in terms of accepting reality I found it an extremely interesting point of view and have since adapted it as an acid test for whether something is true or whether I simply want it to be true.
Hence my personal bastardization of it in the previous post. A thing is what it is and delivers what it delivers. Christianity has been gutted by the globojewish cartels and regardless of whether we think that's good or fair it's a fact. Even if we hit the reset button then the same story would simply play out over and over again, the reason being when you combine an open universalist faith with a peoples inclined toward empathy and good-will then they will inevitably be raped by hostile parasitic subversives. It's as inevitable as the sun rising and setting. Regardless of what we want to believe, "either Christianity has brought us to where we are now or been powerless to prevent it".
The last hundred years especially has shown us that any form of politics or national policy must lean heavily towards exclusivity and much like the Jewish that exclusivity must be baked into the core of that foundation such that to extricate it would be to destroy everything upon which it was built.
Christianity does not offer this exclusivity. Even among the orthodox there is little appetite to turn away a million Somalians who simply make the right noises about conversion for as long as it takes to gain citizenship in that country. The orthodox are the strongest shield in the Christian shield wall and even they are apparently powerless to do much but attempt to close their gates and weather the storm, which will see them end up much like the Ukranians under the Holmodor.
And what will they say as they're being rounded up? "If God wills it, I meet Him with a clear conscience and penitence in my heart".
I remain unconvinced of any system of ideology being capable of protecting most whites from their own stupidity but I absolutely understand why many are turning back to paganism. At least it venerates the survival of the bloodline even if by accepting the law of the jungle.
Moreover I have come to accept that the only reason Christian armies ever held or retook their lands in the past was because the elites driving them were local elites acting in their own local interests. Christianity may have given war a sheen of spiritual legitimacy but to suggest that Christ and those who came after him would have headed a ten-thousand man army marching to sack cities and kill the invading hordes by the thousand is fanciful at best.
The reason Christianity has collapsed as a bulwark against foreign invasion is simple.
The elites are no longer local but global, so instead of calling to local Christianity and local Christians to fight off the foreign elites attempting to take their wealth, they only see Christians now as an impediment to further their agendas. That is to say if back during the crusades the European elites got a better offer from Islam then we'd either never have been born or we'd be speaking arabic at best.
Christianity in and of itself has little to no defence against direct attack and replacement or rapid subversion. Any defence or restoration of Western nations will go around Christianity or trample over the top of it. It's already clear that the vast majority of Christian institutions support globalism without reservation and that their flock are either fully supportive or unwilling to rock the boat in relevant numbers. Of the tiny number of institutions that resist globalism none appear willing take the measures necessary to win.
It is what it is.
