Defeating Islam Megathread

Pride male said:
Would the Islamic world be any different if the Mongols hadn't destroyed Baghdad? And how glorious was the Islamic Golden Age?

Well the Muslims would arguably be more powerful if the Mongols didn't sack Baghdad, but besides that its really difficult to predict how different the Islamic World would be if that didn't happen. Some kind of Caliphate could've possibly survived for longer or lasted in to the present day probably.

The whole Islamic Golden Age thing is considerably exaggerated and part of modern Cultural-Marxist/Globalist or whatever you want to call it historical revisionism which comes from the dominant political interests in our present.

The Muslim Caliphate and other Muslim Empires are deliberately being made to look progressive, advanced and civilized even though that literally couldn't be farther from the truth. This is of course portrayed in contrast to the supposedly barbaric and primitive Christians/Europeans of that time ...

While i'm not an expert on the Muslim Caliphate, i definitely know a lot about the Ottoman Empire which was the most significant Muslim Empire after the Islamic Caliphates for several hundred years. I can certainly tell you that there was nothing civilized and advanced about it as it was literally built upon the forced assimilation, enslavement and genocide (This one only in 20th century) of thousands of non-muslims.

There is a rich but bloody and brutal history of conflict between non-muslims all over the world that has existed ever since the founding of Islam as a religion.

Since you're asking questions like these which indicate interest, i suggest you should take the time to read up on it.
 
Pride male said:
As a black man I know I won't fare well under any type of caliphate. I would rather die than be a eunuch.

Probably true lol.

I suppose if you truly feared for your life you could always just convert to Islam.
After all, there are a lot of African/Black Muslims. Especially in Somalia.
 

infowarrior1

Crow
Protestant
I believe the power of God can do great wonders in regards to Islam:




Since there is much greater effacity of dreams and visions in Islam.

In regards to the rationalistic west. God works more through reason than miraculous signs and wonders.
 
infowarrior1 said:
I believe the power of God can do great wonders in regards to Islam:




Since there is much greater effacity of dreams and visions in Islam.

In regards to the rationalistic west. God works more through reason than miraculous signs and wonders.


Lol. Aren't you aware of the title of this thread?

Honestly, it must be said that probably the only positive or likable quality about Islam from a non-believers perspective is that it insists upon many healthy and natural values. Things like keeping women under control, family formation, community strength, and etc.

Still, i suppose this leads to the question of why is Islam even an issue and why is it necessary to defeat it?
 

infowarrior1

Crow
Protestant
KnjazMihailo said:
infowarrior1 said:
I believe the power of God can do great wonders in regards to Islam:




Since there is much greater effacity of dreams and visions in Islam.

In regards to the rationalistic west. God works more through reason than miraculous signs and wonders.


Lol. Aren't you aware of the title of this thread?

Honestly, it must be said that probably the only positive or likable quality about Islam from a non-believers perspective is that it insists upon many healthy and natural values. Things like keeping women under control, family formation, community strength, and etc.

Still, i suppose this leads to the question of why is Islam even an issue and why is it necessary to defeat it?


I am aware. And this is the best outcome for those within Islam. If they convert to Christianity. Even if they are martyred by the thousands. Because their end is better than their initial state.
 
infowarrior1 said:
KnjazMihailo said:
infowarrior1 said:
I believe the power of God can do great wonders in regards to Islam:




Since there is much greater effacity of dreams and visions in Islam.

In regards to the rationalistic west. God works more through reason than miraculous signs and wonders.


Lol. Aren't you aware of the title of this thread?

Honestly, it must be said that probably the only positive or likable quality about Islam from a non-believers perspective is that it insists upon many healthy and natural values. Things like keeping women under control, family formation, community strength, and etc.

Still, i suppose this leads to the question of why is Islam even an issue and why is it necessary to defeat it?


I am aware. And this is the best outcome for those within Islam. If they convert to Christianity. Even if they are martyred by the thousands. Because their end is better than their initial state.


That's an interesting perspective. I just think its more practical if they were to go back to the Middle East and some of the places they came from.

Unfortunately, there are (((certain reasons))) that make the Middle East a difficult place for Muslims to live in and are also blocking the deportation/expulsion of Muslims from the West back to the Middle East.
 

PharaohRa

Kingfisher
Pride male said:
If it wasn't for the west the Saudi would be stick in the desert riding camels and drinking tea. Why would they want to destroy the west if business with Europe brought them enormous wealth?

When you understand that all Semitic peoples have a feminine-based culture and act like women, you will be able to answer your own question.
 

infowarrior1

Crow
Protestant
KnjazMihailo said:
infowarrior1 said:
KnjazMihailo said:
infowarrior1 said:
I believe the power of God can do great wonders in regards to Islam:




Since there is much greater effacity of dreams and visions in Islam.

In regards to the rationalistic west. God works more through reason than miraculous signs and wonders.


Lol. Aren't you aware of the title of this thread?

Honestly, it must be said that probably the only positive or likable quality about Islam from a non-believers perspective is that it insists upon many healthy and natural values. Things like keeping women under control, family formation, community strength, and etc.

Still, i suppose this leads to the question of why is Islam even an issue and why is it necessary to defeat it?


I am aware. And this is the best outcome for those within Islam. If they convert to Christianity. Even if they are martyred by the thousands. Because their end is better than their initial state.


That's an interesting perspective. I just think its more practical if they were to go back to the Middle East and some of the places they came from.

Unfortunately, there are (((certain reasons))) that make the Middle East a difficult place for Muslims to live in and are also blocking the deportation/expulsion of Muslims from the West back to the Middle East.


I am not disputing this. But one has to consider that there is more going on behind the scenes than just the clash of civilizations.
 

Cumlluminates

Woodpecker
Pride male said:
Muslims can't compete technologically or militarily nowadays. They had their day. I don't think it would take much to defeat Islam. Can they even make guns and planes without any help? If the west can't crush them Japan and China certainly will.

Well, let's not forget Muslim on Muslim killings. Between the Shiite, Sunni, and Kurds it seems that they would like to eradicate/oppress each other.
 
mikado said:
Is your mega project yielding results yet?

Our "mega project" isn't even really an issue as Islam is actually quite easy to defeat contrary to what most people think.

That is, any Muslim terrorist/extremest or rebel/insurgency groups are actually very easy to defeat and destroy by any remotely well organized army or police force. After all, if of all countries in the world, even the armed forces of what's currently called "North Macedonia" could successfully defeat a Muslim insurgency back in 2001, literally anyone in the world can.

The issue of hostile Muslim populations in the West is one that is of a political and social nature. Of course, as i've previously outlined, this issue is one that is practically easy to resolve but the certain groups that i've previously mentioned are the cause of this issue and ultimately using Muslims as their cannon fodder against the West.

There doesn't really need to be any "Mega project" to defeat Islam, but rather certain other forces that have been outlined in my previous posts on this thread.
 

Goni

Woodpecker
KnjazMihailo said:
mikado said:
Is your mega project yielding results yet?

Our "mega project" isn't even really an issue as Islam is actually quite easy to defeat contrary to what most people think.

That is, any Muslim terrorist/extremest or rebel/insurgency groups are actually very easy to defeat and destroy by any remotely well organized army or police force. After all, if of all countries in the world, even the armed forces of what's currently called "North Macedonia" could successfully defeat a Muslim insurgency back in 2001, literally anyone in the world can.

The issue of hostile Muslim populations in the West is one that is of a political and social nature. Of course, as i've previously outlined, this issue is one that is practically easy to resolve but the certain groups that i've previously mentioned are the cause of this issue and ultimately using Muslims as their cannon fodder against the West.

There doesn't really need to be any "Mega project" to defeat Islam, but rather certain other forces that have been outlined in my previous posts on this thread.

Do not confusse things by intention.

The war of 2001 in FYROM was for strictly ethnic reasons , it was not made in the name of " islam".

You like it or not Albanians do not give too much anttention to Islam and it has never been part of their core identity.

The war was made because because the bulgarians of FYROM did not acknowledge the right amount of rights to the non slavic population there which is native and consists of 30% of the population.


Also FYROM did not win, the international community intervened to stop the war because this country invented by Tito and the west was going to disolve.

Even if you would post a war lost by Turkey still does not prove your point because you have to give examples when in the specific war the party who lost the war had islam as its core ideology.

However if you are trying to say that most " muslim" countries are poor and can be easily defeated you have a point but do not forget that unlike in the west the men there are more warlike and sometimes more connected to their fatherland.

Iran is an example.

Turkey to another degree.

However both countries above are not much connected.

Also about the West.

The so called term " western civilisation" which was used by Brits in the 18th century it was always associated with Jews.

The British Empire banks, east and west indies companies, deep politics was under jewish control.

So it was the French African Empire from where the jews created a monopoly in the diamant trade.

After Britain, Jews took under control the USA .

Morgan and Rockefeller families were jewish founded and the control was sealed in 1913 when Federal Reserves was created.

So jews and The West were heavily linked together for centuries.
 
Goni said:
KnjazMihailo said:
mikado said:
Is your mega project yielding results yet?

Our "mega project" isn't even really an issue as Islam is actually quite easy to defeat contrary to what most people think.

That is, any Muslim terrorist/extremest or rebel/insurgency groups are actually very easy to defeat and destroy by any remotely well organized army or police force. After all, if of all countries in the world, even the armed forces of what's currently called "North Macedonia" could successfully defeat a Muslim insurgency back in 2001, literally anyone in the world can.

The issue of hostile Muslim populations in the West is one that is of a political and social nature. Of course, as i've previously outlined, this issue is one that is practically easy to resolve but the certain groups that i've previously mentioned are the cause of this issue and ultimately using Muslims as their cannon fodder against the West.

There doesn't really need to be any "Mega project" to defeat Islam, but rather certain other forces that have been outlined in my previous posts on this thread.

Do not confusse things by intention.

The war of 2001 in FYROM was for strictly ethnic reasons , it was not made in the name of " islam".

You like it or not Albanians do not give too much anttention to Islam and it has never been part of their core identity.

The war was made because because the bulgarians of FYROM did not acknowledge the right amount of rights to the non slavic population there which is native and consists of 30% of the population.


Also FYROM did not win, the international community intervened to stop the war because this country invented by Tito and the west was going to disolve.

Even if you would post a war lost by Turkey still does not prove your point because you have to give examples when in the specific war the party who lost the war had islam as its core ideology.

However if you are trying to say that most " muslim" countries are poor and can be easily defeated you have a point but do not forget that unlike in the west the men there are more warlike and sometimes more connected to their fatherland.

Iran is an example.

Turkey to another degree.

However both countries above are not much connected.

Also about the West.

The so called term " western civilisation" which was used by Brits in the 18th century it was always associated with Jews.

The British Empire banks, east and west indies companies, deep politics was under jewish control.

So it was the French African Empire from where the jews created a monopoly in the diamant trade.

After Britain, Jews took under control the USA .

Morgan and Rockefeller families were jewish founded and the control was sealed in 1913 when Federal Reserves was created.

So jews and The West were heavily linked together for centuries.

I strongly disagree with and dispute your version of events about the 2001 Albanian insurgency in Macedonia.

A more accurate version of events would be that the Albanian KLA/UCK raised arms and started the insurgency to try to forge out an ethnic Albanian territory for future incorporation into a Greater Albania, similar to what they did in Kosovo. This all fits in with the events of the Kosovo War of 1999 as this is soon after that. Also note that the Albanians tried the exact same thing in South Serbia, north of Kosovo immediately after the 1999 Kosovo War by starting an insurgency in the Presevo Valley. Curious isn't it? 3 Albanian armed insurgency's in a space of 2 years, with the other 2 followed by the first one which was openly supported by NATO and the US.

Pande Petrovski, who was the general of the "Macedonian" army, basically decisively defeated the Albanian insurgents in a short period of time and he was only forced to back down since NATO threatened to intervene in favor of the Albanians similar to how they actually did in the 1999 Kosovo War. This is literally the only reason why the Macedonian government was forced to agree to peace negotiations and "give more rights" to the Albanians.

For that matter, the only reason Albania even exists on the map of Europe is because in 1912 after the end of the 1st Balkan War, the great powers of Britain, Austria-Hungary and Italy created Albania on the map in order to deny Russia access to the Adriatic Sea via Serbia. Also, to sabotage Greek access to the Adriatic Sea as well. That also brings up another interesting point, most people aren't actually aware of this, but Northern Epirus or "South Albania", actually has a minority Greek population which is being mistreated daily and has had to endure all sorts of historic injustices. Something that Albanians should think about before they talk about Serbs, Macedonians/Bulgarians and Greeks as being "evil" and denying them rights.

Regarding the whole "Albanians don't give too much attention to Islam thing", that may perhaps be something you and a bunch of other Albanians believe, but considering that there are many Albanians that have gone to fight for ISIS in the name of Islam, its pretty clear that at least some Albanians are very committed to Islam. Also, two prominent ISIS leaders are ethnic Albanians: Lavdrim Muhaxheri and Ridvan Haqifi.

I agree. It's true that the country of Macedonia was invented by Tito to sabotage Bulgaria, Serbia and Greece.

True, Muslim countries like Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are formidable powers.

It's also true that Jewish elites have had very dominant positions of power in Western countries ever since the 18th century. Since you seem to be Albanian, you should ask yourself why it is that the same countries in which Jewish elites happen to be dominant in, are also the ones that are supporting your country and ethnic group. If you find the actions and conduct of this Jewish elite objectionable, then ask yourself for what reasons they're supporting your ethnic group and its Greater Albania ambitions.
 
Lol. Aren't you aware of the title of this thread?

Honestly, it must be said that probably the only positive or likable quality about Islam from a non-believers perspective is that it insists upon many healthy and natural values. Things like keeping women under control, family formation, community strength, and etc.

Still, i suppose this leads to the question of why is Islam even an issue and why is it necessary to defeat it?

France: Teacher decapitated in gruesome 'Islamist terror attack' near Paris

55305967_401.jpg

 

Moolooman

 
Banned
President Trump was very very wise to brand these glorified goat herders as ‘Evil Losers’. And they are losers.

Notice when these ‘monsters’ attack civilians, they always have a massive mechanical advantage. Automatic weapons, knives, trucks... They are tooled up like this for a reason, and that is because in a normal fight, well let’s say there wouldn’t actually be one. Most Islamic males are cowards and will do anything to avoid fighting. They’re quite weak and pretty unintelligent. You can easily outthink them lol

Too scared to face the consequences so they always attack with a mechanical advantage because they know if they don’t they’ll be soundly dealt to.

Let’s call what they do what it actually is. ‘Cowards Attacks’.
 
Top