Easy_C said:Step 1: Go to the lifestyle sub forum.ManVsMachine said:Flame bait? Cute quote, but doesn't work here. The notion that some intangible "masculine energy" is "depleted" from masturbation has been disproven by science time and time again (sources cited in article):
Step 2: Read the "nofap" thread and look at the results other dudes have had as soon as they stopped masturbating.
Easy_C said:You're setting up a convenient strawman founded in a false dilemma fallacy.There are minimal benefits to abstinence (complete abstinence):
But those effects drop off after a period of time (note acute as opposed to chronic abstinence)
No, your options are not just complete abstinence or masturbation. You'd know better than that from experience if you had the discipline to quit jacking off.
, but to ensure that male sexual energy is wasted and dissipated....hence the reason they've been pushing pornography and male masturbation aids.
It's about disempowering males, because every example in history of an effective rebellion was the result of alpha males banding together when the time was right. When you feminize the males, depriving them of their aggression and getting them to deplete their masculine energy into a napkin(or a fleshlight, or a sexbot) you make them more submissive and ensure that they will embrace their role as slaves.
So no. Expect the elite to embrace the spread of sexbots and help it along.
Ah, a reductio ab Rooshum. Roosh "is with me" therefore it must be true. Unfortunately...... we must be reading a different article.Easy_C said:Also even Roosh is with me on this:
He argues:The reason should be clear: porn is creating the thirst.
This is why male thirst is getting worse every year, and the arrival of virtual porn or sex bots will not at all reduce the thirst problem like many believe, but actually increase it.
That is a...what do we call it? Entirely missing the point. You've mistaken the specific for the general. Men being hooked on masturbation and porn is only one of many ways to keep a population submissive. Drugs, excessive availability of alcohol, destruction of the family, etc. all go along with it.Your main assertion is that depleting "masculine energy" into a napkin, you make them more submissive. Their[the "elites"] goal is to feminize the males to avoid rebellion, No?
and THAT is what we call missing the point.With that sexual energy they supposedly lost in a napkin?
Of course I did. You're deliberately obfuscating one of Roosh's most important points that he has made repeatedly since getting into the business: that a thirsty man is the exact opposite of an Alpha Male. With relatively few exceptions thirsty men are not the ones getting laid. They're the idiots and manginas who are like the poor fool I saw today that was the only man sitting in on a "women of ****" event being held out in the plaza.Ah, a reductio ab Rooshum. Roosh "is with me" therefore it must be true. Unfortunately...... we must be reading a different article.
Why would men be thirsty if their sexual energy is depleted in a napkin? Did you even read Roosh's assertions here? I quote: