I suppose I get a laugh out of your avatar, it's very fitting for the thread. I assume you watched King of the Hill and remember the Dale character? He'd probably have a lot to say on this topic. He wasn't always the most self aware, or coherent individual on the show if I remember. Maybe your response wasn't meant to have any reason to it!What's that have to do with anything ?
I suppose I get a laugh out of your avatar, it's very fitting for the thread. I assume you watched King of the Hill and remember the Dale character? He'd probably have a lot to say on this topic. He wasn't always the most self aware, or coherent individual on the show if I remember. Maybe your response wasn't meant to have any reason to it!
TBH I know nothing about the guy...could you explain what your initial response meant?
Prayer does that for me. Honestly.I needed time away
It was direct from the surface of the moon to the surface of Earth (meaning, it wasn't relayed through the command module or an earth satellite) using a system called "unified S-band." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_S-bandI am just curious how were the astronauts able to phone from the moon to the white house?
The Russians were not the champs at that. Their military strategy for centuries has been bodies and land. Slow down the advancement of invaders by throwing bodies at the enemy, and keep retreating forcing great losses. If Hitler hadn't diverted from Moscow, the war would have turned out completely different and that strategy would have failed.You sound young. I lived through the end of the Cold War, and the fear of nuclear annihilation was very, very real. Both sides feared that if they directly engaged with the other side, it would not be a quick, easy victory, and eventually one side would get desperate and fire nukes, causing the other side to fire counter-nukes.
The Soviets were the world heavy weight champs at on-the filed warfare ---it was largely the Russians, and not the West, who won WW2, since the Russians lost so many more men and killed so many more Nazis. But the U.S. had the money and the technological superiority for most of the time, including absolute naval superiority, which is key for trade. It was not a cakewalk fight for either side.
Plus there was no causus belli for either side of the Cold War. Proxy wars were considered safer bets, since there was no direct engagement and therefore no more chance of nuclear engagement.
Had we done what Patton had suggested---done a quick strike invasion right after WW2---we would've had a chance, considering how exhausted the Soviets were, what a suprise it would've been, and how they were so many non-Russians the Soviets in WW2 had conquered who still had enough men that, had we supplied them with arms and food, would've joined us in rebelling and assisted us. But once Patton was killed and the opportunity passed, a full-on fight with the Soviets was NOT going to cause anything but WW3, but with massive more carnage and death and nuclear fallout.
Note also that in the Korean War we didn't engage the Chinese Communists directly, even though they were supporting the Norks. Why? Same reason: a U.S.-China fight would've also led to mass carnage and likely nuclear annihilation. The Chinese aren't white, so claiming this was racism doesn't fly.
Bounce? No, they transmitted directly from the moon to the Earth using S-band microwaves. Here's a picture of the transmitter:So they are able to bounce transmission from the moon surface directly to earth?
Nope. The first catastrophic failure at launch of a manned NASA mission was Space Shuttle Challenger - 20 years later.The previous missions failed at launch right?
They didn't. There were problems on every mission. Some of the problems are very cool to read about - the stories show how smart were the people involved, and how badass the astronauts were.I just have trouble believing that after that they perfectly nailed the trip to the moon and back without a hitch.
That's one of the most common conspiracy theorist questions, which means it's one of the most common questions which is answered by people who reply and respond to conspiracy theorists. So let me just turn it around on you: of the several explanations you've read, what remaining questions do you have?how exactly did they bypass the van Allen radiation belt.
The arguments about the Nazis invading the Soviet Union are legion. Was Hitler insane? Or was it an attempt to jump the gun on the planned Soviet invasion of German territory? Or was it because Hitler needed access to oil ? Or was it Hitler merely following suit with his pure hatred of communism?The Russians were not the champs at that. Their military strategy for centuries has been bodies and land. Slow down the advancement of invaders by throwing bodies at the enemy, and keep retreating forcing great losses. If Hitler hadn't diverted from Moscow, the war would have turned out completely different and that strategy would have failed.
In fairness, China has active plans for a manned moon visit, and has sent recent rovers or probes over per 911's post above somewhere. Mike Pence wants to establish a lab on the moon as well.It's 2020. How come there's no livefeed, HD camera on the moon?
Meanwhile, NASA can drive rovers around remotely on Mars.
Never really looked at it. I think in general framing someone for a murder (or having a fall guy) is certainly possible. I know more about the Misfits song Bullet, than I do about the JFK assassination.1- JFK was shot by a lone disgruntled commie gunman
Suppose not, there is a lot of suspicious activity surrounding 9/11 (and less debunk able science). I don't like what I read about the shady connections with 9/11. I also don't like reading metallurgical analysis by those that don't understand the topic. Y or N? Yeah its super shady.2- 9/11 was the work of 19 scrawny Arabs planned by Ben Laden from an Afghan cave (nearly half of whom are still alive)
Complete BS. Give me a output you want at t time and I can make that model. Meanwhile no one can make a predictive model for the weather a week out. Not to mention CO2 is not quantifiable in natural processes and the Big O (algorithm complexity) of the supposed climate science models is impossible. Total N!3- Man-made CO2 is about to lead to catastrophic global warming.