No idea what that gibberish is supposed to mean. I suppose it means that you have some unrealistic standard of evidence.
"How cum their ain't no 365 degras pictures huh?? Obviously it's fake!!"
Here's a 360 panorama.
"lol no, that wasn't taken with an eye phone 20 so it's fake!!"
Listen. You are in space. Holy cow wow! Stars everywhere. You are a professional astronaut and you have trained all your life for this and finally you have made it to the Last Frontier. Vastness all around! You can look down on earth, you can look up on earth, you can look away from earth towards the outer planets. Shit you can even look at all the satellites! "This is amazing! I'm gonna take a picture of earth and of our big shiny ISS but I AM NOT GONNA SHOW YOU ANYTHING OF SPACE AT ALL LOOKING AROUND HOW TRULY AWESOME IT IS BECAUSE REASONS!"
NASA be like: "Quit dicking around, Faggonaut! You're here to do the Mission. Don't show people too much space! It's not important. The Mission. Focus on the Mission. We have programmed a camera to show the LAUNCH OF THE LUNAR MODULE FROM THE MOON. But we don't wanna look around too much in space because it's not important."
It's not the actual 360 picture/video that is important.
I love it! You guys will say, "the surface of the moon is way too hot!!" and I'll reply, that's why the missions went to places where the sun had just risen. The sun was low in the sky and the surface temp wasn't as hot.
Then you guys will say, "why are the shadows so long??" - we already covered this. That's how shadows work when the sun is low in the sky.
Go back one step, kick your ego to the curb, and read this: https://thenarrowgateweb.com/2016/08/22/the-greatest-liars-of-all-time/
Shadows will be mentioned. Stick with it.
no idea what point you're trying to make.
why do you people so often phrase your gibberish in the form of vague questions? Why can you do just a tiny bit of work for yourself instead of expecting others to do it for you? Want to know what I'd do about the shadow question if I was you? I'd look up the height of the lander and the angle of the sun at the mission location and I'd make a claim like, "assuming a level surface, here's how long the shadow should be."
The point I'm making is your ego is in Defcon 1 and you can't even ask yourself a question. You just have answers. How about some curiosity? Have you ever had curiosity or have you always just believed this shit to be real ever since they programmed you to believe it?
I understand this, it's what Justin C said below. It's not the moon though. It only has one spotlight at allegedly 1.496×10^8 km in the distance.Says the person literally too stupid to understand why a camera taking a picture of a bright surface (the moon or a football field) doesn't capture the stars in the sky.
If you don't understand why there are no stars, then you absolutely aren't qualified to judge the authenticity of that photo.
And let me just repeat something that you people need to learn: think THINK about what you're suggesting here. You're saying they faked the moon landing, but for some reason they couldn't put a few christmas tree lights in the background of the sound stage? Bonus! You're saying they faked the moon landing and they could have just taken a few pics and maybe carefully added stars, but no, for some reason, they choose to take (fake) thousands of images.
Why?? For the love of god, one of you people please answer this question. If you're going to perpetrate a hoax, why would bother to create this much evidence?? Why not just do Apollo 11, just get a few photos, and then say "we beat the russians and all we got was 10 photos" and stop there? Why claim to have landed six times and claim to have thousands of photos?? Why is that a better plan than just faking one landing and stopping there??
If you ever want answers, you'll find them at https://thenarrowgateweb.com.
This is because of light pollution, lol.