Did we land on the moon?

[RedLagoon]

I think it's less special than we think.

It's the same stuff I see in the corporate workplace often, we start a project, we put a lot of energy into it, we desire that project to be a success. If you are in a corporate environment and read the emails you get, you would think the business would be growing 10X every year. People claim successes all the time that are actually failures. They show a 10x growth but forget to say it's on a 100 dollar project. Sometimes it is framing, sometimes exaggeration, sometimes blatant lies.

The same principles go at the government, the ruler says: develop the strongest bomb ever, let's go to the moon, let's make everyone rich. And the system starts working.

There is a problem though going back to the voters saying:


It's the same today:




Does anyone belief we get better health care, roads, airport and less inflation?

When have we heard a politician say? "Hey I invested and failed."

Never.

Careers are built on success not on failure. People in their administrations, press, media will never challenge the leader. (they are also dependant on the success)

The emperor has no clothes.

View attachment 49581

I can very well see a president saying (have seen this many times in my working life)



The same is now happening with Corona, the last 2 years have been a huge governmental disaster. Has any politician stood up? And say: I'm sorry, we really made cardinal mistakes.

These big organisations (government or corporate) are full of lies as they are not challenged, whole careers are built on lies.

Exposing the lies of the previous generation is very risky, these people are powerful and will bring you down. The whole reason you are up, is that you won't challenge the lies of the past. You will just create your own. Which leader would let a boy go up in the ranks that is willing to expose his fraud?

For that reason whistleblowers are always worse off. The system will turn against them, leaders, bureaucrats, so many lives, houses, families, dependant on the lies.

Who wants to accept that grandpa was a war criminal instead of a war hero?

The problem with your metaphor to "corona" is that no one made any mistakes, it was (and is) deliberate. The moon landing? Sure I might consider your take on it, but nah not doing it.

Another deception.

 

[andy dufresne]

Some REALLY bad Moon CGI. I keep hoping they'll get better....

South Korea's lunar orbiter Danuri shares black-and-white photos

Danuri, a portmanteau of the Korean words for 'moon' and 'enjoy', was launched on a SpaceX rocket from the US in August 2022 and entered lunar orbit last month.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Not one star. The earth is fully lit up meaning it's fully daylight. Yet the Moons top is also lit up....showing they messed up the lighting. The moon surface is also brutally computer generated.

 

[rodion]

Some REALLY bad Moon CGI. I keep hoping they'll get better....

South Korea's lunar orbiter Danuri shares black-and-white photos

Danuri, a portmanteau of the Korean words for 'moon' and 'enjoy', was launched on a SpaceX rocket from the US in August 2022 and entered lunar orbit last month.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Not one star. The earth is fully lit up meaning it's fully daylight. Yet the Moons top is also lit up....showing they messed up the lighting. The moon surface is also brutally computer generated.

Is this the “it looks so fake that it must be real because there’s no way they would release faked images this bad” gambit?

 

[Akaky Akakievitch]

Conrad Franz (a based Orthodox podcaster) dismantles the modern secular cosmology cult on the premier episode of this new podcast:

Ep. 1: Biblical Cosmology, NASA and the Space Religion

Listen now | The NASA deception, "spacetheism", mainstream cosmology as a pseudoscience, and more with guest Conrad Franz

thereversion.substack.com

 

[GuitarVH]

Conrad Franz (a based Orthodox podcaster) dismantles the modern secular cosmology cult on the premier episode of this new podcast:

Ep. 1: Biblical Cosmology, NASA and the Space Religion

Listen now | The NASA deception, "spacetheism", mainstream cosmology as a pseudoscience, and more with guest Conrad Franz

thereversion.substack.com

Listened to this just now. Really enjoyed it. Thanks for the link!

 

[Iacobus]

Conrad Franz (a based Orthodox podcaster) dismantles the modern secular cosmology cult on the premier episode of this new podcast:

Ep. 1: Biblical Cosmology, NASA and the Space Religion

Listen now | The NASA deception, "spacetheism", mainstream cosmology as a pseudoscience, and more with guest Conrad Franz

thereversion.substack.com

I haven't done a deep dive on the topic & I don't have any more knowledge than to say that I am a moon landing & NASA skeptic, & I totally understand and agree with ~space~ being a spiritual attack on Christianity, but these guys make themselves sound really silly when they try to make an argument based on the notion that it's just ~way too crazy~ to believe that the Earth could be spinning rapidly or moving through space at a high velocity without us being able to perceive that from our point of view. If you're in a high-end car traveling at high speeds on a well-paved road, you will feel the same as if you're standing still. If you're in a heavy airplane traveling through smooth air, the only clue that you are traveling at high speed is the vibration from the engines. I don't see why this principle couldn't be extrapolated to a huge body moving through space.

Not to say they're right or wrong but it's the opposite of convincing. Any possible cosmology is crazy and hard to swallow if you're only judging based on the testimony of what you can directly perceive with your eyes.

 

[Viktor Zeegelaar]

I haven't done a deep dive on the topic & I don't have any more knowledge than to say that I am a moon landing & NASA skeptic, & I totally understand and agree with ~space~ being a spiritual attack on Christianity, but these guys make themselves sound really silly when they try to make an argument based on the notion that it's just ~way too crazy~ to believe that the Earth could be spinning rapidly or moving through space at a high velocity without us being able to perceive that from our point of view. If you're in a high-end car traveling at high speeds on a well-paved road, you will feel the same as if you're standing still. If you're in a heavy airplane traveling through smooth air, the only clue that you are traveling at high speed is the vibration from the engines. I don't see why this principle couldn't be extrapolated to a huge body moving through space.

Not to say they're right or wrong but it's the opposite of convincing. Any possible cosmology is crazy and hard to swallow if you're only judging based on the testimony of what you can directly perceive with your eyes.

Anytime you hear something with numbers that range in the gazillion, billion, million, trillion years/miles/light years/whatever distance or metric away, you know it's a scam which they pollute with seeming difficulty to groom you into believing they're right, because it's so difficult and you can't understand it, so they must know what they're talking about. It's a complete and utter scam. All astronomy and similar stuff are just modernist lies to make you think we're insignificant in the universe and we don't matter, while we're the center of Creation. They don't want you to know that, so they have to come up with a bunch of lies and theories about space, the origins of life and earth, the planets, and the shape of our planet. It's all irrevocably, unassailably and unequivocally made up to counter the Biblical narrative.

 

[andy dufresne]

I haven't done a deep dive on the topic & I don't have any more knowledge than to say that I am a moon landing & NASA skeptic, & I totally understand and agree with ~space~ being a spiritual attack on Christianity, but these guys make themselves sound really silly when they try to make an argument based on the notion that it's just ~way too crazy~ to believe that the Earth could be spinning rapidly or moving through space at a high velocity without us being able to perceive that from our point of view. If you're in a high-end car traveling at high speeds on a well-paved road, you will feel the same as if you're standing still. If you're in a heavy airplane traveling through smooth air, the only clue that you are traveling at high speed is the vibration from the engines. I don't see why this principle couldn't be extrapolated to a huge body moving through space.

Not to say they're right or wrong but it's the opposite of convincing. Any possible cosmology is crazy and hard to swallow if you're only judging based on the testimony of what you can directly perceive with your eyes.

Anytime you hear something with numbers that range in the gazillion, billion, million, trillion years/miles/light years/whatever distance or metric away, you know it's a scam which they pollute with seeming difficulty to groom you into believing they're right, because it's so difficult and you can't understand it, so they must know what they're talking about. It's a complete and utter scam. All astronomy and similar stuff are just modernist lies to make you think we're insignificant in the universe and we don't matter, while we're the center of Creation. They don't want you to know that, so they have to come up with a bunch of lies and theories about space, the origins of life and earth, the planets, and the shape of our planet. It's all irrevocably, unassailably and unequivocally made up to counter the Biblical narrative.

Speed of light is GPS location of great pyramid....Hmmmm....Couldn't be a masonic scam could it?

The GPS coordinates of the Great Pyramid encode the speed-of-light, Pi, and the Euler constant. Why?

Did you know that the speed-of-light gives you the GPS coordinates of the Great Pyramid? The modern GPS coordinates of the Great Pyramid encode the speed of light (c), as well as Pi (π), and the Eu…

thedebate.org

 

[paternos]

Anytime you hear something with numbers that range in the gazillion, billion, million, trillion years/miles/light years/whatever distance or metric away, you know it's a scam which they pollute with seeming difficulty to groom you into believing they're right, because it's so difficult and you can't understand it, so they must know what they're talking about. It's a complete and utter scam. All astronomy and similar stuff are just modernist lies to make you think we're insignificant in the universe and we don't matter, while we're the center of Creation. They don't want you to know that, so they have to come up with a bunch of lies and theories about space, the origins of life and earth, the planets, and the shape of our planet. It's all irrevocably, unassailably and unequivocally made up to counter the Biblical narrative.

• Very true on the "because it's so difficult and you can't understand it".
• The mystical names: Dark matter, dark energy, black holes.
• Same with the huge numbers: gazillion, billion, million, trillion years/miles/light years
• And then: Real smart scientists

Total red flags.

This combo:
Scientists found a new planet 8000 light years away with a circumference of 50300 miles similar to Uranus and we call it Edwardimaginos named to the famous scientist Edward Cohen who did groundbreaking work on the discovery of black holes. Cohen studied in Harvard and got his PhD on 20 years old solving the Equotranstrional equation on which was already addressed in the Byzantine kingdom and which was unsolved for 3000 years.

 

[Viktor Zeegelaar]

• Very true on the "because it's so difficult and you can't understand it".
• The mystical names: Dark matter, dark energy, black holes.
• Same with the huge numbers: gazillion, billion, million, trillion years/miles/light years
• And then: Real smart scientists

Total red flags.

This combo:
Scientists found a new planet 8000 light years away with a circumference of 50300 miles similar to Uranus and we call it Edwardimaginos named to the famous scientist Edward Cohen who did groundbreaking work on the discovery of black holes. Cohen studied in Harvard and got his PhD on 20 years old solving the Equotranstrional equation on which was already addressed in the Byzantine kingdom and which was unsolved for 3000 years.

Let me add this, and this is literally from Google:

The first cells consisted of little more than an organic molecule such as RNA inside a lipid membrane. One cell (or group of cells), called the last universal common ancestor (LUCA), gave rise to all subsequent life on Earth. Photosynthesis evolved by 3 billion years ago and released oxygen into the atmosphere.

 

[paternos]

Let me add this, and this is literally from Google:

The first cells consisted of little more than an organic molecule such as RNA inside a lipid membrane. One cell (or group of cells), called the last universal common ancestor (LUCA), gave rise to all subsequent life on Earth. Photosynthesis evolved by 3 billion years ago and released oxygen into the atmosphere.

hahaha THIS

They must have a BS generator for this.

 

[Viktor Zeegelaar]

hahaha THIS

They must have a BS generator for this.

This venerable ancestor was a single-cell, bacterium-like organism. But it has a grand name, or at least an acronym. It is known as Luca, the Last Universal Common Ancestor, and is estimated to have lived some four billion years ago, when Earth was a mere 560 million years old.

--

All life came from a single-cell, bacterium-like organism guys. All life! The trees, humans, plants, animals. Everything! When earth was ''a mere'' 560 million years old.

Ok enough rant

 

[doodydota]

“I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view.”​

―Nikola Tesla

Another good argument is this:
Space is akin to a shadow. Space is the absence of matter, like a shadow is the absence of light. "Space" is not a thing. It is not a fundamental entity. All talk about "bending" and "curving" space is high-IQ mathematicians' poppycock in the category of "sounds awesome, but you are too stupid to comprehend how it works".​

 

[Острог]

Just like cold can only be the absence of warmth and not a thing in and of itself. There is no such thing as cold.

You could connect this even with evolution - this is all Jewish meddling designed for the sole purpose of denying the existence of God.

 

[Papaya]

• Very true on the "because it's so difficult and you can't understand it".
• The mystical names: Dark matter, dark energy, black holes.
• Same with the huge numbers: gazillion, billion, million, trillion years/miles/light years
• And then: Real smart scientists

Total red flags.

This combo:
Scientists found a new planet 8000 light years away with a circumference of 50300 miles similar to Uranus and we call it Edwardimaginos named to the famous scientist Edward Cohen who did groundbreaking work on the discovery of black holes. Cohen studied in Harvard and got his PhD on 20 years old solving the Equotranstrional equation on which was already addressed in the Byzantine kingdom and which was unsolved for 3000 years.

Its true. Goodwill Hunting was the documentary

 

[Thomas More]

Its true. Goodwill Hunting was the documentary

My boy's wicked smart!

 

[RedLagoon]

I haven't done a deep dive on the topic & I don't have any more knowledge than to say that I am a moon landing & NASA skeptic, & I totally understand and agree with ~space~ being a spiritual attack on Christianity, but these guys make themselves sound really silly when they try to make an argument based on the notion that it's just ~way too crazy~ to believe that the Earth could be spinning rapidly or moving through space at a high velocity without us being able to perceive that from our point of view. If you're in a high-end car traveling at high speeds on a well-paved road, you will feel the same as if you're standing still. If you're in a heavy airplane traveling through smooth air, the only clue that you are traveling at high speed is the vibration from the engines. I don't see why this principle couldn't be extrapolated to a huge body moving through space.

Not to say they're right or wrong but it's the opposite of convincing. Any possible cosmology is crazy and hard to swallow if you're only judging based on the testimony of what you can directly perceive with your eyes.

Speed doesn't kill, it it"s the sudden deceleration that will.

I know what you mean re these kind of podcasts, we are still living in a material world which has material rules. To dismiss is just uh... not smart.

 

[KomnenAl]

Conrad Franz (a based Orthodox podcaster) dismantles the modern secular cosmology cult on the premier episode of this new podcast:

Ep. 1: Biblical Cosmology, NASA and the Space Religion

Listen now | The NASA deception, "spacetheism", mainstream cosmology as a pseudoscience, and more with guest Conrad Franz

thereversion.substack.com

I listened for 20 minutes.
This is one of the stupidest podcasts I've ever I listened to.
To clarify, I don't believe "we" went to the moon, but these guys claim that the earth is flat, space doesn't exist and (get this) the earth is still because they can't feel the speed

 

[donovan]

I listened for 20 minutes.
This is one of the stupidest podcasts I've ever I listened to.
To clarify, I don't believe "we" went to the moon, but these guys claim that the earth is flat, space doesn't exist and (get this) the earth is still because they can't feel the speed

I think it's an excellent podcast. They are asking the right questions.

Let me tell you what IS stupid: believing the official narrative. The last 3 years has proven to all of us that the "Science"/Scientism is politics, and that includes the space textbooks you read in school.

 

[Pontmercy]

Question at 30:16

Nice Buzz Aldrin interview - his handlers were quick to pounce.

There are arguments that he misheard the question etc etc, but my standpoint here is that conscience cannot be brushed aside wholesale, in the man with a soul, without outbursts here and there.

Probably posted before on here, apologies for a repeat if so.