It would probably make sense to create another thread on the question of general and special relativity. I only recently started reading Einstein's papers and some criticisms of it, and it seems to me like a kind of crazy rebranding of the Doppler effect.
People frequently make the argument that relativity has been proven in experiments, but I think precisely the relativity part is what can't be proven. As with philosophy, introducing relativism doesn't really do anything to a conversation but destroying its context. Relativity is a nonsense postulation, as Tesla and Charles Steinmetz (and many others back then) pointed out. Relativity just destroys the notion of absolute movement, something that would be patently absurd for any scientific investigation a normal person on earth would come up with.
It's a strikingly talmudic feat to suddenly destroy all thus far reasonable assumptions about space and movement simply by introducing a "maybe there are no fixed points and movement isn't real" dialectic. It's very similar to what they did with dialectics in political dialogue, where no ideological debate ever goes anywhere because there is no fixed philosophical standard for ethics.
I am by no means an expert and I don't view myself as mathematically minded, but looking at it from the outside it seems like a hoax. It just has too many parallels with hoaxes these people introduced in other aspects of society. Also the fact that Einstein's Nobel prize was pretty much forced in with the crowbar and after that Jews just started taking over universities with whacky theories that no one can understand or explain.
This.
Well said, I think you put the finger on the sore spot here.
I was yesterday speaking to a lawyer friend of mine who is a Christian. He said I can always argue every case, always. Every side. I can make it look as if it is the logical thing in the world. That the other side is complete nonsense. Logically flawed.
Any lawyer will tell you this. You can argue any direction. But that doesn't mean it's Truth.
Debating is a great example of this. The pretense is, it's bring up all arguments, the reality is both become agents of their falsehood. It's just words. Logical structures. It's fake.
It's not the the truth lies in the middle as they always say. NO. Truth is truth. Christ is the living truth. And there is closer and further away.
We need to discern what is truth we need to do it together
That's why I think politics is fake. It's a fake conflict. As if truth is the middle of anti-BLM and BLM. It denies the Christ. And hence centrist is just a weird point just as far from the truth. As the other 2 options.
The relativity theory is typical Jewish quackery. Everyone repeats it like parrots, ooh Einstein is so smart, but who gets it, what does he say? What is this? What is actually at hand? Why is this relevant for the civilian? How does this improve his life? Why does he need to honor a "scientist"? Let's zoom out.
It's a replacement of Christ. Einstein needs to symbolize the pinnacle of human enlightenment. He is soooo smart that nobody gets it. If we just follow these scientists heaven on earth will be there for us. With unlimited energy and fuel and warmth.
That we put faith in wormholes as the big unknown.
The more I learn the more visible it gets.
If you control the frame (of left right and middle), deny Christ, the people never find truth and freedom in it, and this hiding of the truth leads to all the mental problems we see today. Blue haired girls with tattoos are automutilation, it's acts that kids do that are in severe mental distress.
Anyhow the Nobel prize is a Jewish political prize that is used a lot in propaganda. I mean why would and should we care what some elites say what is good. It's similar to the oscars, same weird spectacle giving each other prizes for how good they find eachother.
I think I'm so passionate about it because it took me so long to get out of it. And all these works of fiction lead us from the real truth.
