Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Culture
Deep forum
Discussion on the necessity of the Atomic Bombs(And general Strategic Bombing) on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="infowarrior1" data-source="post: 1494159" data-attributes="member: 6516"><p>Could be. But if the precision bombing and things like it was tried first in order to obtain victory. Which apparently the USA actually contemplated by US Veterans of WWI. Which Dan Carlin's guest goes into detail about:</p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]KKRWk060_6w[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>Then it would be less of a problem if firebombing is just something that had to be done as a result. Inferior more horrific alternatives being considered and implemented.</p><p></p><p>In this regard I regard superior Strategem as less morally hazardous than using Arms given how it can and does turn out.</p><p></p><p>One of the general principles of Sun Tzu. That is the economy of resource and manpower expenditure to achieve maximum results.</p><p></p><p>Although Dan Carlin does make the observation that as time went on. There probably was a tendency towards more callousness.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="infowarrior1, post: 1494159, member: 6516"] Could be. But if the precision bombing and things like it was tried first in order to obtain victory. Which apparently the USA actually contemplated by US Veterans of WWI. Which Dan Carlin's guest goes into detail about: [MEDIA=youtube]KKRWk060_6w[/MEDIA] Then it would be less of a problem if firebombing is just something that had to be done as a result. Inferior more horrific alternatives being considered and implemented. In this regard I regard superior Strategem as less morally hazardous than using Arms given how it can and does turn out. One of the general principles of Sun Tzu. That is the economy of resource and manpower expenditure to achieve maximum results. Although Dan Carlin does make the observation that as time went on. There probably was a tendency towards more callousness. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Culture
Deep forum
Discussion on the necessity of the Atomic Bombs(And general Strategic Bombing) on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Top
