Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Culture
Deep forum
Discussion on the necessity of the Atomic Bombs(And general Strategic Bombing) on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="911" data-source="post: 1496439" data-attributes="member: 11221"><p>That's the official version that has been recirculated ad nauseum, in truth you don't have to dig very deep to find the testimony of high level American military commanders and foreign policy analysts involved in that process in 1945 who have unequivocally stated that Japan was ready for an unconditional surrender well before Hiroshima:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Halsey is right, for one thing, the Nagasaki bombing was about the live testing of a type of nuclear bomb design than was different from the Hiroshima "Little Boy" uranium. Nagasaki was a plutonium-based "Fat Man" design. You can debate whether Hiroshima was necessary, but not Nagasaki, it was the most egregious case of overkill, figuratively and literally.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Most historians that dominate academia and the publishing industry are shills, you don't have to dig very deep to discover the truth on important historical facts and events, provided that you have the capacity to look past common propaganda.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="911, post: 1496439, member: 11221"] That's the official version that has been recirculated ad nauseum, in truth you don't have to dig very deep to find the testimony of high level American military commanders and foreign policy analysts involved in that process in 1945 who have unequivocally stated that Japan was ready for an unconditional surrender well before Hiroshima: Halsey is right, for one thing, the Nagasaki bombing was about the live testing of a type of nuclear bomb design than was different from the Hiroshima "Little Boy" uranium. Nagasaki was a plutonium-based "Fat Man" design. You can debate whether Hiroshima was necessary, but not Nagasaki, it was the most egregious case of overkill, figuratively and literally. Most historians that dominate academia and the publishing industry are shills, you don't have to dig very deep to discover the truth on important historical facts and events, provided that you have the capacity to look past common propaganda. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Culture
Deep forum
Discussion on the necessity of the Atomic Bombs(And general Strategic Bombing) on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Top