Do You Deserve A Good Woman?

Roosh

Cardinal
Originally posted on RooshV.com


An endless refrain I hear from men is that there are no good women. The assumption is that these men are themselves “good,” but a quick look at their anemic faith and unbridled passions shows that they are far from it.

What can we assume about a woman who cries out that there are no good men? She’s older, probably in her 30s. She’s certainly not a virgin, and probably has racked up numerous sexual partners from at least a decade of dating. She’s entitled, thinking she deserves happiness or success. We also know she has placed many worldly objects above God, and thinks a good man should be given to her because of her intelligence, beauty, career, or tattoos.

A man who cries out for a good woman is often not that much different. Just like her, he’s older, probably in his 30s, with many women notched on his belt. He’s cynical from having his heart abused so many times, and is less capable of love than a younger man with less experience. He’s entitled, thinking that because he has some money in his bank account and can hold a job, he is deserving of a good woman, and like his analog, he has put faith in the world before God.

If I had a daughter of marriageable age, and she was strong in the faith, the only man suitable for her would be a man whose faith is stronger than hers, not a man who thinks he can seamlessly transition from a life of partying, fornication, and secularism to one of family without repenting of his sins and accepting Jesus Christ as his King. I wouldn’t care about his experience, worldly wisdom, or money. I wouldn’t care about how many countries he has been to or how many languages he speaks, and I certainly wouldn’t care about the power or fame he has in this world. I would only care about how close he is to God, because when it comes to my daughter, her salvation is my top priority, and I would forbid her to marry a man who could risk it.

Therefore do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ For after all these things the Gentiles seek. For your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added to you. Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about its own things. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble. —Matthew 6:31-34

I don’t encounter many who have noticed the word “first” from the above. To them, God is for later, after intensely pursuing all manner of worldly gain, and even family for the sake of creating a family, when disconnected from God, is a worldly pursuit. Attaining a wife and children, in most people’s minds, is no different than attaining a job, just another checkmark in the bucket list of life. Game, confidence, and effort are used in this attainment, but it would be unlikely for it to lead to good unless ordained by God. Your own efforts will yield a woman who is as worldly as you, who whines about the state of affairs of gender relationships like you, who is scared of dying alone like you, and who wants to put a few checkmarks on her bucket list just like you.

I have no will but God’s will. I aim to serve God fully and completely, and through this faith, if He suits it, I will meet a wife, not through secular effort or confidence. In the process of honoring God, whether in my church, participating in fellowship with other Christians, or serving my neighbor will a God-sent woman appear, as if out of thin air. Women of this country don’t have to change themselves to please me or be more attractive to me. They only need to serve God, and if He sends me a match, we will serve Him together in the little church of our home.

Truth is most men don’t deserve a good woman. Their faith is weak. They don’t have a consistent prayer rule. They come up with the flimsiest of excuses not to attend church. They watch porn and masturbate. They ache to fornicate and see a woman’s body as a source of pleasure and amusement. They can’t control their passions, and allow pride to seduce them into all manner of harmful behaviors. God keeps his good women away from men like them, just like how He kept them away from me. You can travel to the ends of the earth to meet your “good” wife, interact with thousands of the most exotic women, but in the end you’ll merely find one who is as worldly as you.

When your faith becomes so strong that you are serving God out of love instead of for material rewards, your entitlement will fade. Your distress about finding a woman will cease, because you will come to the understanding that “His will be done” means His will be done, not your will be done. You will serve God in whatever state he wants you to be in, whether single or married, and not murmur against Him. I don’t worry about finding a woman or any other worldly desire—I worry only about loving the One God.

Read Next: Most Relationships Built Using Game Will Fail


Permalink
 
Truth is most men don’t deserve a good woman.
This is true, but it's not a societal problem.

The supply of good, marriage-worthy men (small though it may be) far, far outstrips the supply of marriage-worthy women. That's the problem.

Good women have plenty of good men to choose from. Good men don't have many (some have zero) good women to choose from.

Imagine you could convert every single man on Earth into exactly your ideal of what a good man should be. How many more successful families would you create? I argue: zero. It's the lack of good women that's the problem.

Now, I get that increasing the number of good men would have positive societal effects, and would spur more women to give up their degeneracy, but that was a hypothetical just to illustrate where the problem lies. You can't actually convert every single man into your ideal. Through your work, you will undoubtedly help a few, but not enough to change the society that corrupts women.

Fundamentally, the situation with men is zero-sum. Any man who you help, who then manages to find a good woman and start a family, necessarily prevents some other man from getting married - because the limiting factor are the women. So if you want to increase the number of healthy families, you have to get women to change.
 

mubs100

Sparrow
If you want to get a good women you need to be able to talk good about life. It's just love of life that translates into love from women. She don't love you she loves the things you are about. So it is not about confidence or insecurity, because it's not about you, it's about what you personify.

Too many men dont realise this. They think the women care about them. This is social conditioning. On dating apps everyone has to mention facts about them like hobbies and interests. But Hobbies and Interests have nothing to do with love.

You have to take life seriously and think about stuff. Then you talk about those things and they watch you and get affected. But if they are looking at you you cant be looking at them, you have to look at the prize.
 

EndlessGravity

Kingfisher
Good women have plenty of good men to choose from. Good men don't have many (some have zero) good women to choose from.

Is this really true? Apply your thinking to male relationships. I've seen articles with men reporting increasing feelings of isolation, with many reporting ZERO friends. ZERO.

Personally, I look around the men I know...and I'm unimpressed. Lazy, entitled, fat, uninformed, unambitious, and controlled by their wives or girlfriends when they have one.
 

Elipe

Woodpecker
I agree with the general thrust of Roosh's article, but I also agree with prophet60091. Roosh is speaking on a spiritual level, and he's not wrong, many of us really don't deserve good women. I am married to a wonderful woman who absolutely fits the Biblical description of a good woman, and I would go as far as to say I don't, spiritually, deserve a woman like this.

But if we were to start talking about "deserve" like this, then the fact is: almost every human being deserves to burn in hell. But the Lord, in His infinite wisdom, mercy, and love, thankfully didn't just leave it at that. He could have just thrown us all in hell and then walked away, and He wouldn't have the problem of having our sinful filth ruining His perfect world. But He apparently thought that would be useless, and it would be pointless for Him to do something like that. He created us to love us, for better or worse, and so He continued to allow us to exist in this world, even with all the problems that arose with us. Apparently, He decided that it was better that we should continue to live in this world and make something of it, even with the sad state we find ourselves in.

And so this brings me in agreement with prophet's point: we may be sinful, unfaithful men that don't deserve a good woman, but, who can throw the first stone? Shall we drive humanity to extinction because no man is truly worthy of a good wife?

The fact is, even with how spiritually slovenly many of us are, I would prefer that my daughter married a man like one of you folks here, because as dirty, as downtrodden, as immature as many of us here are, I look around beyond this forum and see something much, much worse. At least here, we acknowledge our unworthiness, and that is the essence of Christianity: a repentant heart.

Jesus taught this:
Luke 18:9-14 said:
To some who were confident of their own righteousness and looked down on everyone else, Jesus told this parable: “Two men went up to the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee stood by himself and prayed: ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other people—robbers, evildoers, adulterers—or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week and give a tenth of all I get.’

“But the tax collector stood at a distance. He would not even look up to heaven, but beat his breast and said, ‘God, have mercy on me, a sinner.’

“I tell you that this man, rather than the other, went home justified before God. For all those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.”
Shall we send our daughters off to marry the proud, whitewashed Pharisees, or the tax collector who would not even look up to heaven on account of the burden of his sins? Who truly is the good man here?

Roosh would probably never entrust his daughter to me, but I will assert that I am one of the "good men" that women ought to marry, not out of any sense of self-righteousness, but because the reality of the situation is that a man like me with a church attendance problem is still one of the best men out there you could possibly want to be the father of your grandchildren, because I acknowledge that the church attendance problem is a problem, and that my future children will need a good church home.
 

third_eldest

Sparrow
Great post, thanks for the spiritual encouragement.

I'm a young man (Almost 21) who has never been in a long term relationship, and I can count the amount of dates I've been on with my two hands. But in all honesty, I thank God for it. When I look back and see who I was two or three years ago its very clear to me that I was in no position to get into a relationship. God was using this time in my life to undo the heart of selfishness, and learning to abide in him and become a vessel of HIS will, not mine. He's still using this time, I'm in no way a finished product. There are still aspects of my character that need refining. But now I operate with the mindset of final victory, because I have victory in Christ. As I've focused my efforts away from pursuit of women in the worldly sense, and instead choosing to follow Christ and be a good brother in Christ to both my brothers and sisters, I've found my relationships and ability to connect far greater and more fulfilling.

Does it necessarily mean that I will find someone to start the next chapter of my life? No. But I have a reformed Church that has adopted me into their community, nurturing my soul, a family that has blessed me with spiritual wisdom, and physical wealth so that I need not worry about tomorrow. I have placed my desire for a wife and kids, something I have wanted my whole life, on the altar. God will do with it as he pleases.
 

Blade Runner

Kingfisher
This is true, but it's not a societal problem.

The supply of good, marriage-worthy men (small though it may be) far, far outstrips the supply of marriage-worthy women. That's the problem.

Good women have plenty of good men to choose from. Good men don't have many (some have zero) good women to choose from.

Imagine you could convert every single man on Earth into exactly your ideal of what a good man should be. How many more successful families would you create? I argue: zero. It's the lack of good women that's the problem.

Now, I get that increasing the number of good men would have positive societal effects, and would spur more women to give up their degeneracy, but that was a hypothetical just to illustrate where the problem lies. You can't actually convert every single man into your ideal. Through your work, you will undoubtedly help a few, but not enough to change the society that corrupts women.

Fundamentally, the situation with men is zero-sum. Any man who you help, who then manages to find a good woman and start a family, necessarily prevents some other man from getting married - because the limiting factor are the women. So if you want to increase the number of healthy families, you have to get women to change.

Indeed. The only thing I would make a point to correct is your first statement. It's absolutely a societal problem. It is that by definition.

Similarly, if you attack the women side of the equation (marxism/feminism) you get ... precisely what we see today. It's a remarkable support of prophet60091's thesis - but it was done societally/culturally/economically. It is actually a gatekeeper idea, a macro version of the gatekeeping of the micro issue of sex (women are the gatekeepers). Now, it is a conundrum in that you have to have bad men to corrupt or ruin the control the previous good men had in running the country - but it turns out that, from a power point of view, that only requires a small number of men to start the domino effect, have others go along with it, and allow the corruption of the women. Sad but true, and slowly but surely.

ps - I think for most, not for all - and case by case is the only way to analyze this - most men don't focus on "deserving" anything. At least I can speak for myself: I find it frustrating how people (men) with a lot going for them can have such a go at it and looked at with distaste for yearning for youth, fertility, beauty, etc. Then insulted by suggestions that they should bail a girl out who doesn't have those characteristics anymore. It's a joke for most - even those who desire to be traditional and want to commit to someone worthwhile.
 
Last edited:
It's absolutely a societal problem. It is that by definition.
Fair enough. A better way to express what I mean would have been, "the number of good men isn't the limiting factor"

One thing I wonder about, is the extent to which "loser" men would better themselves if they had the possibility of wedding a good woman.

Take for example a typical 19 or 20 year old young man who is generally disillusioned and directionless. His life is a kind of dull hedonism. He plays video games, watches porn, and masturbates all day. He doesn't read or work out or go to school (or if he does go to school, he doesn't apply himself) because he is without hope. He can get laid sometimes, but the girls available to him don't show him love. He knows they are also having sex with many other men, and he knows they all have at least one alpha guy they are hung up on. Women don't offer him anything more than temporary pleasure, and they don't demand anything from him.

I wonder if he would/could get his life together if there was a girl who sat him down and said, "here's the deal: I have not bonded with any other man, but I will bond with you - I will love you with all my heart for all my days - I will give you exclusive sexual access and I will give you children - I will respect your authority over our family, and will cooperate with you to raise our children to be according to our shared values - but, you have to give me 100% of your productive effort - you have to provide for us, even if it breaks your back - you have to protect us, even if it means sacrificing your life - you have to be dedicated to us, giving up your hedonistic pursuits (no more video games, no more porn, no more alcohol) - you have to get educated, you have to get in shape, you have to be competent and useful (for example, knowing how to build/fix things)."

I wonder how many men would rise to that challenge. They're "losers" in part because that deal isn't available to them.

I'm confident that no woman in that age range (who is currently on the carousel) would give up her life of attention and promiscuity to a man who offered that to her. And frankly, it wouldn't matter if she did, because she's likely already an alpha widow, which means even if she really tries to make a marriage work, the shadow of that past alpha will loom over it.

Young men may be losers, but they could improve if there was a reward for improvement. Young women are basically ruined once they get a taste for "bad boys"
 

Elipe

Woodpecker
I wonder if he would/could get his life together if there was a girl who sat him down and said, "here's the deal: I have not bonded with any other man, but I will bond with you - I will love you with all my heart for all my days - I will give you exclusive sexual access and I will give you children - I will respect your authority over our family, and will cooperate with you to raise our children to be according to our shared values - but, you have to give me 100% of your productive effort - you have to provide for us, even if it breaks your back - you have to protect us, even if it means sacrificing your life - you have to be dedicated to us, giving up your hedonistic pursuits (no more video games, no more porn, no more alcohol) - you have to get educated, you have to get in shape, you have to be competent and useful (for example, knowing how to build/fix things)."
That would not attract those men. Women are supposed to be submissive toward men, not domineering. The woman you described here sounds like she would be extremely obnoxious and difficult to put up with for a few years, let alone a full lifespan. When I imagine a woman that speaks like this to a man, I imagine a woman that looks like this:

Unlike say:

The latter is what gets these men up out of bed and out to the fields, not the former. The former lectures and scolds, the latter inspires men to be their best, simply because of the way she smiles at them.

Women don't smile at men like they used to. They don't look down at the ground when their eyes meet a man's. They don't speak with a gentle voice. They don't thank men when they hold the doors open for them. They don't giggle in a very endearing manner at a man's jokes. They don't carry themselves with grace or elegance. Whenever a man they're not attracted to does them a favor, that man is a "creep".

The men you describe are, precisely, the men that hold the doors open for women. They are the men that do the girl's homework because they like the girl. They are the men that buy flowers for girls they like. They are the men that lay their coats out on the muddy puddle for the woman to walk over. And they were rejected and spurned, repeatedly, and called creepy, weird, ugly, sexist, deplorable, etc.

Are those not the men you want your daughter to marry? A man that will take care of your daughter, a man that puts her needs before his own? A man who sees a woman as more than a vagina with a pair of legs?

It's easy to see why men just turned to video games and stopped trying to do their best for women. They did try their best when they were younger, and it got them nowhere. Sure, they should've learned Game and how to apply charisma with women, but, we're talking about a tool that is designed to get a woman to think with her vagina, not with the Holy Spirit.

I don't intend this to be some kind of gamma/omega whine, but I'm just pointing out that I've seen the gammas and omegas' dead, surrendered eyes suddenly light up when they see a sweet and graceful "girl from next door" like the second woman pictured above that is not just yet another fat, angry hambeast. That's what you need to get them going, not a scolding. Men need inspiration, not beatings.

And all our society does with men, especially the 'loser' men, is give them beatings.
 
Last edited:
When I imagine a woman that speaks like this to a man, I imagine a woman that looks like this:
lol well okay yeah, if they said it out loud, it would seem odd.

But note that men don't say out loud the man's side of the deal either. I mentioned respect, authority, sexual access, children - it would sound strange if a man walked up to a woman and laid it all out like that. A woman might respond, "if a man came up to me and said this, I imagine him looking like [insert unappealing pic here]"

all our society does with men, especially the 'loser' men, is give them beatings.
Oh yeah, I've got a link that illustrates that: https://freenortherner.com/2013/10/18/one-more-condom-in-the-landfill/

The tl;dr is that a man writes to an advice column about a girl that dumped him for a "bad boy" - the advice he gets is to just accept it and wait until she's older (read: post-wall) and then she'll date him.

The best part is the comment on the advice column website by the girl who says she dumped a nice guy, and he turned into a jerk and had sex with a bunch of girls. She says, "don't be like him!" Yeah, definitely don't change yourself into the kind of man who gets sex - not that! Anything but that!
 

STG

Robin
lol well okay yeah, if they said it out loud, it would seem odd.

But note that men don't say out loud the man's side of the deal either. I mentioned respect, authority, sexual access, children - it would sound strange if a man walked up to a woman and laid it all out like that. A woman might respond, "if a man came up to me and said this, I imagine him looking like [insert unappealing pic here]"


Oh yeah, I've got a link that illustrates that: https://freenortherner.com/2013/10/18/one-more-condom-in-the-landfill/

The tl;dr is that a man writes to an advice column about a girl that dumped him for a "bad boy" - the advice he gets is to just accept it and wait until she's older (read: post-wall) and then she'll date him.

The best part is the comment on the advice column website by the girl who says she dumped a nice guy, and he turned into a jerk and had sex with a bunch of girls. She says, "don't be like him!" Yeah, definitely don't change yourself into the kind of man who gets sex - not that! Anything but that!

Solid article thanks for sharing.

Just another overlooked story of a once-great civilization dying, tiny, unnoticed piece by tiny, unnoticed piece.

When the last, violent, death throes of whatever is left of our civilization come, I’m going to revel in their suffering, for it will be well-deserved.

Let it burn.

100% agree.
 

STG

Robin
From viewing marriage through the lens of civilization, marriage is an economic contract.

The government is fulfilling the male's economic role in marriage by subsidizing single mothers through forced taxation on males.

All male taxpayers are being cucked to a certain extent by the government. The government through legalized theft (taxation) from men takes the man's surplus labor and redistributes it to women (welfare, food aid, gov housing, maternity leave from work). Women then are allowed to use their reproductive surplus as they please while men have no choice regarding the surplus of their labor.

If the situation were reversed, the government would force women to become the personal property of men, even if the men did not work.

The Fraud of Modern Marriage (Women as Chattel)

You see, all throughout the animal kingdom, motherhood is a pretty common theme. It is positively everywhere! What is not common in the animal kingdom however, is fatherhood. Nope, not too many baby deer know who their fathers are. Fatherhood is a foreign concept in most of the animal kingdom.

Female mammals often find themselves living in a herd filled with many other females, all being bred by one dominant alpha male. The females congregate in herds because it is the only way they and their offspring can safely survive. Yes, herd living is true Communism where all is shared and they all get fat or starve together. Ever wonder why women tend to all think the same way and why they desire big, Socialist government over individualism and freedom? Ever wonder why women will stick up for another woman even when they know that woman is obviously in the wrong? It’s because of their allegiance to the herd. The herd comes first. Now you know.

But, one must wonder, what happens to the males that don’t become the alpha male who breeds the whole lot of women?

Well, when a male reaches sexual maturity, he must challenge for breeding rights within the herd. Those males who fail to successfully challenge the alpha males become beta males, and get forced to leave the herd by the alpha. The beta males generally end up living on the fringes of the herd/society where they fend for themselves individually.

Now, interestingly, the beta males living outside the herd seem to manage to survive individually just fine without the need to be part of a herd like the females do. This is because the male is not saddled with children and, also, he is stronger than a female. The male has a surplus of labour which enables him to live individually apart from the herd. In fact, a male has so much surplus labour, that if he lives individually he needs only to expend about 20-30% of it to ensure his survival.

When one stands back and observes the whole lot, we see that both males and females have a surplus and a shortage:

Males have a surplus of labour but a shortage of reproductive ability.

Females have a surplus of reproductive ability but a shortage of labour.

Now, perhaps, you can see why marriage is an economic contract.

The male “sells” his surplus labour to the female in exchange for her reproductive ability.

The female “sells” her reproductive ability to the male in exchange for his surplus labour.

In order to “sell” something, you first must “own it” yourself, and upon “selling it,” you are agreeing to transfer ownership of it to the buyer. This is the basis of economics, and as you can see, it is based on property rights.

In the economic contract of marriage, the female agrees to transfer the ownership of her sexual reproductive ability to the male, and she takes ownership of his surplus labour as payment for it.

You see, the feminists always leave out that the woman sold her sexuality and took something in exchange for it: The man's surplus labour.

And benefit from a man’s surplus labour the wives of the past most surely did!
.
She benefited by no longer having to rely on the Communist lifestyle of the herd for her survival. When in need of protection she pushed the man out the door first to deal with the danger, rather than rely on the size of the herd, hoping it would hide her from harm when the weak stragglers get taken down by the wolves.

She benefited enormously by increasing the amount of labour available to her, giving her the ability to live in a wooden house with a real roof, rather than sharing a grass hut with a bunch of other women.

Women took something very real in exchange for selling their sexuality. They took a man’s labour as their own, and they benefited from this in almost every way imaginable.

So did the children she mothered benefit a great deal, and so did society in general.

Remember all those beta males who were existing outside of the herd, living on the fringes of society? They were only exerting 20-30% of their potential labour to survive.

Once married and attached to their own children, these beta males were suddenly yoked like an ox and working at 100% capacity. This utilization of the full capacity of male labour is what pulled mankind into a civilization. It is what built our houses and planted our corn. It built our roads and our bridges. It created our literature and our art. It created, well, pretty much everything that we have. Men, women and children all obviously benefited from this.

Have a look around the room you are in.

Everything within it involving more than two moving parts was invented by a man.

Welcome to the Patriarchy! (Sometimes it is simply known as civilization, but also, occasionally, as fatherhood).

Thus, when you hear that “marriage is the foundational building block of society,” you are hearing the exact truth. And society, or rather, advanced society, is based on the economic contract of marriage. The economic contract of marriage is based on property rights. Property rights are the basis for Capitalism, and Capitalism is the basis for an advanced society which upholds the ideals of individualism, personal responsibility and Liberty.

Now, whether you wish to agree or disagree with the way society has existed for millennia, as outlined above, is entirely irrelevant. What is relevant is that the above description is what the contract of marriage was based on throughout history. Your personal feelings are irrelevant to history.
 
This is true, but it's not a societal problem.

The supply of good, marriage-worthy men (small though it may be) far, far outstrips the supply of marriage-worthy women. That's the problem.

Good women have plenty of good men to choose from. Good men don't have many (some have zero) good women to choose from.

Imagine you could convert every single man on Earth into exactly your ideal of what a good man should be. How many more successful families would you create? I argue: zero. It's the lack of good women that's the problem.

Brother, I respectfully disagree with you. Have you ever been in a church? Have you gotten active in that church, aside from Sunday morning rituals? There are too many women looking for a good, God-fearing, church attending man. If you dress well and act respectfully, you will get no shortage of interest from women looking to intentionally pair up, and they tend to move fast (I've heard cases of courting starting within a month of initially meeting in the church social setup, followed by an engagement around the 3rd month, and marriage within a year, though 6 months is more usual than not). The older they are, the faster they move (a lot of the good girls tend to be committed, if not married, by 22 years, but not all).

What's the point of waiting for several years if you're both not having sex and both of you know you're only getting older? And as long as you end the courting respectfully if she is not for you, you can continue to remain in church community with limited issues stemming from the "break-up", and a pool of girls who would still date you, aside from her close friends (assuming things didn't get ugly). (I say date, but I really mean courting, because it's "get-to-know each other phase" to see if this can lead to marriage).

The key here is to be involved in the youth/young adults/singles group that the church may offer, NOT with the intent of wife-hunting, but just to be present and available and bond with the church community. And to gently and respectfully reject or pursue the options that may present themselves to you. Another key is to remember being intentional: if you can't see a future with her, don't waste her time, and be upfront about it. Women talk, and being candid gets you a lot of points in the long run, even if it hurts in the moment for her.
 

Elipe

Woodpecker
From viewing marriage through the lens of civilization, marriage is an economic contract.

The government is fulfilling the male's economic role in marriage by subsidizing single mothers through forced taxation on males.

All male taxpayers are being cucked to a certain extent by the government. The government through legalized theft (taxation) from men takes the man's surplus labor and redistributes it to women (welfare, food aid, gov housing, maternity leave from work). Women then are allowed to use their reproductive surplus as they please while men have no choice regarding the surplus of their labor.

If the situation were reversed, the government would force women to become the personal property of men, even if the men did not work.

The Fraud of Modern Marriage (Women as Chattel)
This is a really good article that explains the institution of marriage from a civilizational point of view, that is, the forest's, rather than the tree's. This is indeed one of the reasons marriage exists, and it even dovetails nicely with what God said of Adam with respect to Eve:

"It is not good for the man to be alone."

What is the right to sexual reproduction, but God's solution to man being alone? With it, man can do something deeply intimate with a woman, and have children to surround him as a result. Adam had a family, and that family grew so large that it split into tribes, and those tribes grew large enough to become nations. Civilization comes from this institution that exists so that man would not be alone. Marriage truly is a big piece of the foundation of civilization.
 
Top