^The auto manufacturers love this, planned obsolescence on steroids... Big oil also is in the loop, companies like BP are heavily invested into biofuel production.
The automakers love this less than you think.
Planned obsolescence has been built into the modern automobile since General Motors introduced automotive styling and subsequently annual styling changes in the late-20s.
Like any large industry, automakers invest and tool based on future predictions and value stability over constantly moving targets. They already went though this in the 1970s/80s and don't want to do it again.
After the first oil shocks of 1973, General Motors and Ford both invested billions in downsizing platforms giving birth to the '77 B-bodies and '79 Panther cars respectively. This was pre-CAFE, btw, so this was a genuine response to market concerns. The cars were immediate runaway successes, combining more advanced engineering, small-block V8s and large-displacement V6s, with chassis that both weighed hundreds of pounds less than before, were trimmed by at least a foot, and yet boasted greater space efficiency and excellent highway fuel economy with sacrificing any real performance.
GM, however, felt another oil shock was coming in the mid/late-80s with an accompanying recession and further downsized most of the lines in the FWD E- and C/D-bodies ('85 DeVilles/Fleetwood , Ninety-Eight, '86 Electra/LeSabre/Eighty-Eighty). The personal luxury coupes (Eldorado/Toronado/Riviera) suffered the most, hemorrhaging sales year after year from '86-90 when they finally grew in exterior dimensions.
Ford chose to stick it out and mopped the floor with Cadillac as traditional buyers loved the still full-sized Town Car and Continental offerings of the time.
Automakers benefit from consumer-driven obsolescence, not government meddling. 5MPH bumpers, roof strength standards, and now CAFE is the bane of the industry as a modern car is usually designed 3-5 years ahead of its introduction.
Also, on the retail side, service and maintenance are the main profit centers for a an automobile retailer - remember that in the US, manufacturers do not sell to end-users directly, rather to dealers who then resell to the ultimate buyer. Dealerships are loathe to abandon their largest source of consistent revenue along with their platform through which a customer is retained and eventually makes another purchase.
In any case, I see no more than 50-65% total penetration of the new light passenger car/truck market by full electric vehicles at least in our lifetimes, this number of course fluctuating regionally.
I'm not against EVs at all as a matter of consumer choice, just against the thought of forced purchasing along with the connectivity and surveillance that comes with a modern EV. They actually make a lot of sense for certain applications, like vehicles that operate consistent patterned routes with little deviation and lots of stop-and-go driving, like garbage collection, transit buses, and school buses in urban/suburban areas.