This is for aggregating publicly available items of evidence that would be admissible in court, not general election news stories or updates.
Shared it with some "moderates" and they are going insane trying to say that anyone can make spreadsheets and videos. Good way to get publicity
Look at the hard data and tell me if any of these states make sense to you
And Biden was a great candidate with a plan who spent a lot of time in Wisconsin?Here's one theory: Hillary Clinton was a really bad candidate. She wasn't inspiring, she had no plan, and she acted entitled to the job. I think even all but the most left-wing Democrats would agree she was just a bad overall candidate. Democrats were so uninspired by her that they didn't turn out to vote at all. Another group didn't vote as they assumed she would be the winner so no use in voting.
Clinton never visited Wisconsin at all during the 2016 election season. She assumed she would win. Is it surprising she did so poorly in voter turnout, given she ignored the state? Trump was the first Republican to win Wisconsin since Reagan in 1984.
Obama was a much stronger candidate, and you can see that in your graphs. Then came Clinton and Democrats didn't bother to vote. Then in 2020 they decided to vote again, after seeing what happened in 2016.
But did anyone actually look at voter records and signatures in NH? Just recounting fraudulent votes will always yield the same result.Well, I know that in NH the increased Dem turnout was due to relaxed rules about absentee ballots. Many hand-recounts were done there and the votes did not look skewed at all, and voter fraud is very low there because in 2016 they had an investigation to look at potential fraud. About a dozen people got caught and were seriously fined or jailed, but no other problems were found. NH is a secure state that got a huge boost from the mail-in voting schemes, which removes all effort from the process of voting and really lets turnout reach near-maximum levels.
Mail-in voting is a serious problem that lets normally lazy voters actually get out and vote, and lazy people always vote Dem.
But did anyone actually look at voter records and signatures in NH? Just recounting fraudulent votes will always yield the same result.