Fantastic article: Why women shouldn't work

The fact is that men want women to work. Double income = double fun. More money for a bigger house, more gadgets, more vacations, less economic stress on the man. How many men today will want a stay at home wife? Such a woman will be considered lazy by most men.


This is circular...

A woman working is quite an expensive proposition... A second car, insurance, expensive clothing/wardrobe for her to work, children being raised in day care, mental health services for the woman as she slowly burns out, criminal defense attorneys and rehab for the kids as they become teenagers and get into the juvenile correction system and the prison-industrial complex.

If you want your wife to work and your children to be raised by public schools and day cares then you should accept that you will one day talk to your children through a plexiglass partition using a phone anchored to the wall.

If you consider the extreme expenses associated with a woman working, most people cannot actually afford it if they crunch the numbers and weigh the costs. Most of the revenue generated by a woman working is almost immediately consumed covering the short-term expenses and ongoing expenses associated with her working.

Suppose your woman makes $40,000 per year, but now you need to spend $400 per month on a car payment for a second car, $200 per month in gasoline on that car, $150 per month on insurance for that car, $1500 per month on daycare, we're already at $2,250 per month in expenses associated with her working. See where this is going?

For most couples, a woman working is an absolute and complete waste and is actually a detriment to the family. She works to earn the money to finance her ability to get to work and work and have her children raised by strangers while she works.
 

JNick

Pigeon
Orthodox
The fact is that men want women to work. Double income = double fun. More money for a bigger house, more gadgets, more vacations, less economic stress on the man. How many men today will want a stay at home wife? Such a woman will be considered lazy by most men.
Not all men want women to work outside the home. She can work as a homemaker. Wouldn't you want a to come home to a freshly prepared meal every day after work? She can take care of the laundry, cleaning, and homeschooling the children. The children will be able to resist the lies of public education. There's nothing lazy about being a good stay-at-home wife.

What good are those worldly things anyway? After a certain wealth threshold, those things only give temporary satisfaction and feed your vanity. There's more to life than stuff.
 

GWYW2015

Woodpecker
Orthodox
When I married my wife I ran through those things about where money tends to go when she is working. She is from the Philippines. I gave her the option of not working but she wants to work to support her family (she doesn't expect me to) back home. If we had a child I would want her at home even if neither of us was working, although I would try if I had to, as I am currently not able to.
She has always maintained she wanted a job and has worked since she LEGALLY immigrated. I wish we could have had children but that's not how it worked out.
 

Towgunner

Kingfisher
The fact is that men want women to work. Double income = double fun. More money for a bigger house, more gadgets, more vacations, less economic stress on the man. How many men today will want a stay at home wife? Such a woman will be considered lazy by most men.

No, disagree with this. The fact is that in order for a family to get by both the man and the woman are required to work because the cost of living is so high. In the not so distant past only one person was needed to work in order to generate sufficient income to take care of a family.

From an economic perspective its not so much that stay at home women are rarer today because of social convention, rather, out of necessity. But, herein things get messy. Because it did start with a revolt against social convention by feminists that insisted women should work, this flooded the labor market with excess labor, which reduced wages. So, since for every man there's a woman, you can say proportionally, the labor force effectively doubled creating 2 laborers when there used to be one, ergo, the need to have 2 wage earners today in order to get by.

More than anything, that is the driving force. But, like every other time, when we start to manipulate otherwise self-operating systems, i.e. "the invisible hand" - Adam Smith, there are consequences. My generation, GenX, is saddled by the whole 2 wage earners needed to support a family. Millennials can't even do that and they're constrained by a worsen effect of a variety of progressive policies that attempted to manipulate otherwise natural forces. For instance, student loans, have been devastating to household formation. But, the student loan crisis is a crisis created from ill-conceived social programs that insisted all people should go to college. And that is an attempt to manipulate nature.
 

Towgunner

Kingfisher
Something to consider. As this woke thing slimes its way into corporations, what I think will happen quite soon is the promotion, literally, of non-white women over white women. Up until this point, white women have benefitted the most from socialist policies. This is undisputable in my opinion. Go anywhere and you'll see this effect. White women rode this wave of quotas and affirmative action. But, just like the impressionable white women who were told that fulfillment only comes from a nifty title and corner office, this kind of vanity is desired by minority women too. And, the diversity bean-counters will have a lot of fresh meat to work on.

The major investment banks, like Goldman Sachs, caved to feminist pressure in the late 80s and early 90s. This is exactly when the term "sexual harassment" came into vogue. Scores of women sued these banks for millions and cost them a lot of bad publicity. The banks, being what they are, hired women but hired the kinds of women that, per the spirit of social justice, didn't really need a leg-up. All of the females I've seen on trading desks and hedge funds came from well-to-do backgrounds. Also, you'll find a high representation of Asians and Indian females. But, as we're seeing, Asians are being discriminated against because they're just too smart.

What we do not have is a lot of diverse representation of black of Latin or Indigenous American etc women. The number 1 demand for sjws is to hire and promote more diverse people, which translates to black people, homosexuals, crossdressers and as a distant fourth latinX folk. I expect to see this displacement occur in earnest soon.
 
Something to consider. As this woke thing slimes its way into corporations, what I think will happen quite soon is the promotion, literally, of non-white women over white women. Up until this point, white women have benefitted the most from socialist policies. This is undisputable in my opinion. Go anywhere and you'll see this effect. White women rode this wave of quotas and affirmative action. But, just like the impressionable white women who were told that fulfillment only comes from a nifty title and corner office, this kind of vanity is desired by minority women too. And, the diversity bean-counters will have a lot of fresh meat to work on.

The major investment banks, like Goldman Sachs, caved to feminist pressure in the late 80s and early 90s. This is exactly when the term "sexual harassment" came into vogue. Scores of women sued these banks for millions and cost them a lot of bad publicity. The banks, being what they are, hired women but hired the kinds of women that, per the spirit of social justice, didn't really need a leg-up. All of the females I've seen on trading desks and hedge funds came from well-to-do backgrounds. Also, you'll find a high representation of Asians and Indian females. But, as we're seeing, Asians are being discriminated against because they're just too smart.

What we do not have is a lot of diverse representation of black of Latin or Indigenous American etc women. The number 1 demand for sjws is to hire and promote more diverse people, which translates to black people, homosexuals, crossdressers and as a distant fourth latinX folk. I expect to see this displacement occur in earnest soon.


If feminism is throwing white women under the bus it means that white women are in for a rude-awakening and it also means that they are no longer needed as a part of the base to undermine the Western world. The subversion and demoralization is basically completed, over, and done.

In Western Europe the white women feminists are being thrown under the bus for the benefit of Islam, "refugees," and Sharia advocates.

In the USA the white women feminists will be thrown under the bus for the benefit of Central American, Asian, and Black-American women.

White women are no longer relevant to the power base of the elite powers that have relied on upper middle class white female feminists for the last 3-4 decades.

Feminism is sort of like pre-millenial dispensationalism, it did its job, the damage was done, the damage is permanent, and now it no longer matters. I was talking to a Baptist friend about dispensationalism and the Dallas Theological Seminary and he said "Dallas is in steep decline" and I said, "it doesn't matter, it served its purpose, it helped mislead a generation of conservative Christians with a pro-Zionist viewpoint from the 1950s to the 1990s, now it is okay if Dallas is in steep decline and folds, it is no longer useful in a post-Christian post-Modern world where most young people not only don't get into dispensationalism or know about dispensationalism, they don't get into Christianity period."


By the 2030s openly Sharia politicians will hold incredible power in places such as Netherlands, France, and Belgium, and white women in those countries will either be legally required to wear the veil and the hijab via changes to the laws which require them to wear those garments, or they will be wearing them out of fear due to the extreme street violence [i.e. acid attacks] that gangs will inflict upon women [including white western women] who do not comply with their demands. The authorities in places such as France and Belgium will become increasingly neutered, weak, ineffective, to the point that they will not even do much except attempt to enforce laws against docile white people who are still willing to accept the authority of the central governments from Paris, Brussels, etc. Islamists will be openly defiant of what little semblance remains of French authority and French law, only a handful of timid white French will still obey the dictates and demands of French police who will mostly be there to make sure the French don't organize to try to defend their borders.

Most of the tyranny will be done to Europeans by their fellow Europeans, who will be ordered by the state to keep their countrymen in line while the borders remain open and the change, displacement, replacement, continues without interruption.


Imagine the Barbarian Goths massing on the Danube and the Roman Emperor sends in the legions not to curtail and crush the Goths but to hold the local Roman populations in check and make sure they don't hinder the Goths from crossing the Danube. This is what will happen in Europe.


If you are a European under the age of 50, unless you die young, you will live to experience Sharia in Europe, whether it is imposed with the weight and force of law or the weight and force of the mob.

Feminism in the West was only ever intended [and necessary] for the purpose of destabilizing the demographics and causing Western nations to implode. That is over and done, it has been fulfilled, it is complete. The elites who used feminism don't care if Western women aged 20-45 wind up single, childless, victims of acid attacks, and opt to get medically assisted suicide in their 50s as they wallow in misery and realize they threw their lives away and supported demonic politicians who led them into hell.

As an aside, I predict that there will be a massive surge in female suicide in Western nations over the next 30 years.
 
Last edited:

Nukie

Sparrow
Orthodox
Something to consider. As this woke thing slimes its way into corporations, what I think will happen quite soon is the promotion, literally, of non-white women over white women. Up until this point, white women have benefitted the most from socialist policies. This is undisputable in my opinion. Go anywhere and you'll see this effect. White women rode this wave of quotas and affirmative action. But, just like the impressionable white women who were told that fulfillment only comes from a nifty title and corner office, this kind of vanity is desired by minority women too. And, the diversity bean-counters will have a lot of fresh meat to work on.

The major investment banks, like Goldman Sachs, caved to feminist pressure in the late 80s and early 90s. This is exactly when the term "sexual harassment" came into vogue. Scores of women sued these banks for millions and cost them a lot of bad publicity. The banks, being what they are, hired women but hired the kinds of women that, per the spirit of social justice, didn't really need a leg-up. All of the females I've seen on trading desks and hedge funds came from well-to-do backgrounds. Also, you'll find a high representation of Asians and Indian females. But, as we're seeing, Asians are being discriminated against because they're just too smart.

What we do not have is a lot of diverse representation of black of Latin or Indigenous American etc women. The number 1 demand for sjws is to hire and promote more diverse people, which translates to black people, homosexuals, crossdressers and as a distant fourth latinX folk. I expect to see this displacement occur in earnest soon
A female Swedish party ledare recently said "White women must step down in favour of foreign born women" (approximate translation)

This made me laugh.

Use Chrome to translate directly on the page.

Miljöpartiets kvinnliga språkrör Märta Stenevi avslöjar i en intervju med Aftonbladets Anders Lindberg att hon tycker det är dags att vita kvinnor kliver av sina positioner till förmån för invandrade kvinnor.

https://www.nordfront.se/marta-stenevi-vita-kvinnor-maste-lamna-over-till-de-utlandsfodda.smr
 
A female Swedish party ledare recently said "White women must step down in favour of foreign born women" (approximate translation)

This made me laugh.

Use Chrome to translate directly on the page.



https://www.nordfront.se/marta-stenevi-vita-kvinnor-maste-lamna-over-till-de-utlandsfodda.smr

White women are being thrown under the bus as we speak and because of their behavior and the general characteristics they have adopted [as a general group/class] over the last 20-40 years, most of them are going to be left high and dry because most Western white men implicitly understand Western white women are damaged goods and straight-up wrecks/messes. The men have seen their fathers, brothers, uncles, friends, be subjected to horrible high maintenance relationship drama, divorces, false accusations, etc., or they have been directly subjected to the same themselves.

I think when the system finally boots white women off the diversity bus, the women will be left to shrivel up and grow old alone, single and childless. Seeing as how they served their role in crashing demographics and destabilizing society they are no longer needed by the New World Order and they can be discarded at any time. This seems to be that time, we are witnessing the discarding on an ongoing basis.
 

Towgunner

Kingfisher
White women are being thrown under the bus as we speak and because of their behavior and the general characteristics they have adopted [as a general group/class] over the last 20-40 years, most of them are going to be left high and dry because most Western white men implicitly understand Western white women are damaged goods and straight-up wrecks/messes. The men have seen their fathers, brothers, uncles, friends, be subjected to horrible high maintenance relationship drama, divorces, false accusations, etc., or they have been directly subjected to the same themselves.

I think when the system finally boots white women off the diversity bus, the women will be left to shrivel up and grow old alone, single and childless. Seeing as how they served their role in crashing demographics and destabilizing society they are no longer needed by the New World Order and they can be discarded at any time. This seems to be that time, we are witnessing the discarding on an ongoing basis.

Good post. I agree with this. I'll admit, part of me says white women deserve what's coming to them. Its very hard to stomach a relatively good looking female that has been given everything to her. Meanwhile when she feels like it will parrot some inane feminist party line going on about oppression or bicycles or wage gaps etc and in the next moment she'll be degrading of all men and boastful of her greatly inflated and largely unearned accolades if any. And they wonder why no one wants to be around them. All this coming from a suburbanite who enjoyed all the pleasantries of life.

Christianity is not an eye for an eye morality. Matter of fact Christ is the only genuine person to ever walk this Earth and offer the other cheek to strike. But, Christianity also is reveals the truth of human nature. It is not moral to desire retribution or, gasp, revenge, but, since men have endured a great deal of suffering under feminism, what more can we expect. Once more, it will not be men enacting their revenge, rather, it will be other females. The temptation to see white over-privileged females get a does of more of their own medicine is compelling. Therefore, I'll concede my sin in this instance, because, I welcome such a thing.

In the end I think there will be good that comes from all this. In that, the story of women today is a cautionary tale, and so, it is a tale of what not to do.
 

Nukie

Sparrow
Orthodox
Good post. I agree with this. I'll admit, part of me says white women deserve what's coming to them. Its very hard to stomach a relatively good looking female that has been given everything to her. Meanwhile when she feels like it will parrot some inane feminist party line going on about oppression or bicycles or wage gaps etc and in the next moment she'll be degrading of all men and boastful of her greatly inflated and largely unearned accolades if any. And they wonder why no one wants to be around them. All this coming from a suburbanite who enjoyed all the pleasantries of life.

Christianity is not an eye for an eye morality. Matter of fact Christ is the only genuine person to ever walk this Earth and offer the other cheek to strike. But, Christianity also is reveals the truth of human nature. It is not moral to desire retribution or, gasp, revenge, but, since men have endured a great deal of suffering under feminism, what more can we expect. Once more, it will not be men enacting their revenge, rather, it will be other females. The temptation to see white over-privileged females get a does of more of their own medicine is compelling. Therefore, I'll concede my sin in this instance, because, I welcome such a thing.

In the end I think there will be good that comes from all this. In that, the story of women today is a cautionary tale, and so, it is a tale of what not to do.
Yea, I laughed at the cultural Marxists latest bizare power move, not due to revenge of wanting white women to be replaced by immigrant women, I want them replaced by white men lol and the immigrants repatriated.
 

Anomaly

Sparrow
If I recall correctly Martin Luther said women women should be wives or prostitutes. I believe prostitution is a detestable practice and that he was generalizing and speaking with emotion, but I actually would take those designations considering it would end the social pathologies we see in this modern hellscape.
 
Proverbs 31:10-31

10 Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies.


11 The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil.


12 She will do him good and not evil all the days of her life.


13 She seeketh wool, and flax, and worketh willingly with her hands.


14 She is like the merchants' ships; she bringeth her food from afar.


15 She riseth also while it is yet night, and giveth meat to her household, and a portion to her maidens.


16 She considereth a field, and buyeth it: with the fruit of her hands she planteth a vineyard.


17 She girdeth her loins with strength, and strengtheneth her arms.


18 She perceiveth that her merchandise is good: her candle goeth not out by night.


19 She layeth her hands to the spindle, and her hands hold the distaff.


20 She stretcheth out her hand to the poor; yea, she reacheth forth her hands to the needy.


21 She is not afraid of the snow for her household: for all her household are clothed with scarlet.


22 She maketh herself coverings of tapestry; her clothing is silk and purple.


23 Her husband is known in the gates, when he sitteth among the elders of the land.


24 She maketh fine linen, and selleth it; and delivereth girdles unto the merchant.


25 Strength and honour are her clothing; and she shall rejoice in time to come.


26 She openeth her mouth with wisdom; and in her tongue is the law of kindness.


27 She looketh well to the ways of her household, and eateth not the bread of idleness.


28 Her children arise up, and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praiseth her.


29 Many daughters have done virtuously, but thou excellest them all.


30 Favour is deceitful, and beauty is vain: but a woman that feareth the Lord, she shall be praised.


31 Give her of the fruit of her hands; and let her own works praise her in the gates.

Yet in other parts of Holy Writ women are to be keepers at home(Titus 2:5)

So why the apparent contradiction.

Actually it is not. All this is an example of a Home Run Business.

Of spinning wool which is a traditional woman's work and of buying and planting Vineyards. It goes to show that she can be a manager of a Household economy and employ maidens to help her.
 

eradicator

Peacock
Gold Member

GWYW2015

Woodpecker
Orthodox
Since I had to retire early, I am very glad my wife is working and even advancing. We'd have no insurance without her. That wasn't my plan but things happen. We also don't have children. A working wife doesn't have to be seen as a threat. She wants a job and wants responsibility. I am proud of her. She doesn't complain, steady as a rock.
 
Since I had to retire early, I am very glad my wife is working and even advancing. We'd have no insurance without her. That wasn't my plan but things happen. We also don't have children. A working wife doesn't have to be seen as a threat. She wants a job and wants responsibility. I am proud of her. She doesn't complain, steady as a rock.
I hope it will work out well for you and your wife.
 
Top