Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
Feds seize Backpage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="debeguiled" data-source="post: 1182919" data-attributes="member: 7867"><p>Terminology creep always comes first.</p><p></p><p>And so trafficking means any man anywhere near a skank or in her address book.</p><p></p><p>And if you point this out in polite company you will be accused of being pro sex slavery.</p><p></p><p>It started with feminism, and to paraphrase the old line about antisemitism:</p><p></p><p>A misogynist used to be someone who doesn't like women. Now it's someone who women don't like.</p><p></p><p>Rape used to have specific a legal definition. Now it seems to encompass female dissatisfaction on any level.</p><p></p><p>Domestic Violence can now mean disagreeing with women (gaslighting) or failing to give them money when so directed.</p><p></p><p>No need to elaborate on what hate speech now means. Just pick any thread in certain forums.</p><p></p><p>Tangential but related.</p><p></p><p>Got a new one for you guys. We all know that grooming started off as a useful term to describe the way pedos manipulate children.</p><p></p><p>By the law of terminology creep, that means any adult male talking to anyone under 18 for any reason.</p><p></p><p>Saw in the Daily Mail they took it to the next level.</p><p></p><p>Psych Professor is accused publicly of grooming an adult. The short end of the wedge is that the person had cancer, so, to question this new bit of anti-moral sophistry is to be in favor of abusing the ill.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5589321/Psychology-professor-43-groomed-recovering-cancer-patient-sex.html" target="_blank">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5589321/Psychology-professor-43-groomed-recovering-cancer-patient-sex.html</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It won't be long until grooming can apply to any conversation between consenting adults, and it will still have the pedo stink to it. </p><p></p><p>Soon there will be no necessary connection between a word and a reality at all. All that will matter is who is saying it.</p><p></p><p>And Lauren Hill will be right. Inadvertently, retroactively, but if it works for rape, it will work for songs. Everything will be everything.</p><p></p><p>If you have the social credentials, whatever you say goes, and asking whether or not it makes sense will be [pick your accusation.]</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]i3_dOWYHS7I[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="debeguiled, post: 1182919, member: 7867"] Terminology creep always comes first. And so trafficking means any man anywhere near a skank or in her address book. And if you point this out in polite company you will be accused of being pro sex slavery. It started with feminism, and to paraphrase the old line about antisemitism: A misogynist used to be someone who doesn't like women. Now it's someone who women don't like. Rape used to have specific a legal definition. Now it seems to encompass female dissatisfaction on any level. Domestic Violence can now mean disagreeing with women (gaslighting) or failing to give them money when so directed. No need to elaborate on what hate speech now means. Just pick any thread in certain forums. Tangential but related. Got a new one for you guys. We all know that grooming started off as a useful term to describe the way pedos manipulate children. By the law of terminology creep, that means any adult male talking to anyone under 18 for any reason. Saw in the Daily Mail they took it to the next level. Psych Professor is accused publicly of grooming an adult. The short end of the wedge is that the person had cancer, so, to question this new bit of anti-moral sophistry is to be in favor of abusing the ill. [url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5589321/Psychology-professor-43-groomed-recovering-cancer-patient-sex.html[/url] It won't be long until grooming can apply to any conversation between consenting adults, and it will still have the pedo stink to it. Soon there will be no necessary connection between a word and a reality at all. All that will matter is who is saying it. And Lauren Hill will be right. Inadvertently, retroactively, but if it works for rape, it will work for songs. Everything will be everything. If you have the social credentials, whatever you say goes, and asking whether or not it makes sense will be [pick your accusation.] [MEDIA=youtube]i3_dOWYHS7I[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
Feds seize Backpage
Top
