Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Father" data-source="post: 1182946" data-attributes="member: 6911">Hmmm...let's see: &quot;28 commercially and sexually exploited children ...were rescued&quot;.&nbsp; What does that&nbsp; mean, exactly?&nbsp; &quot;Commercially exploited&quot;? Did someone use them to get more food stamps?&nbsp; The biggest &quot;commercial exploitation&quot; of children is child support payments!&nbsp; Women use kids as cash crops.&nbsp; Even &quot;sexually exploited&quot; stops short of saying the kids were used as prostitutes; maybe nude photos were taken.&nbsp; The next article (&quot;128 human traffickers&quot;) names one case of someone trying to sell kids for sex, and is silent about what the rest of the &quot;trafficking&quot; is.&nbsp; Coyote's smuggling people across the border?&nbsp; Arranging work for illegals?&nbsp; We have no idea, because like most of these stories, they carry sensationalized headlines and not much detail.&nbsp; How about details of the actual charges, something like &quot;Jason O'Pimp was charged with 184 counts of child prostitution&quot;.&nbsp; Why do we never see that?Look, i'm as much against kids being sexually abused as the next guy.&nbsp; I just don't think backpage or The Erotic Review has much to do with it.&nbsp; The BIGGEST purveyors of kiddie-diddling are groups that the law goes out of its way to protect - trannies, homo's, etc.&nbsp; Most of the action on those sites is willing women renting themselves out to willing men, as happens all over the world and all throughout history.&nbsp; Are there bad actors out there? Sure.&nbsp; Some.&nbsp; Let's arrest them!&nbsp; But you can't shut down the internet because someone once did a drug deal over it, or ban cars because 37K americans a year are killed in them (a tiny fraction far outweighed by the benefits to society of automobiles).&nbsp; Likewise, shutting down sites (which just happen to be favored among men) because somewhere in the world, some kid got touched by a pedophile is silly.&nbsp; Did we shut the catholic church down?&nbsp; They are FAR bigger abusers - and they didn't use the internet.&nbsp; Neither did Sandusky.And why do i rarely hear about little GIRLS being raped?&nbsp; You do hear about it, but maybe 1/100th as much as you hear little boys being fucked by men.&nbsp; Sorry, but that says to me that pedo's are much more of a problem in the gay community than society is allowed to discuss.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Father, post: 1182946, member: 6911"] Hmmm...let's see: "28 commercially and sexually exploited children ...were rescued". What does that mean, exactly? "Commercially exploited"? Did someone use them to get more food stamps? The biggest "commercial exploitation" of children is child support payments! Women use kids as cash crops. Even "sexually exploited" stops short of saying the kids were used as prostitutes; maybe nude photos were taken. The next article ("128 human traffickers") names one case of someone trying to sell kids for sex, and is silent about what the rest of the "trafficking" is. Coyote's smuggling people across the border? Arranging work for illegals? We have no idea, because like most of these stories, they carry sensationalized headlines and not much detail. How about details of the actual charges, something like "Jason O'Pimp was charged with 184 counts of child prostitution". Why do we never see that? Look, i'm as much against kids being sexually abused as the next guy. I just don't think backpage or The Erotic Review has much to do with it. The BIGGEST purveyors of kiddie-diddling are groups that the law goes out of its way to protect - trannies, homo's, etc. Most of the action on those sites is willing women renting themselves out to willing men, as happens all over the world and all throughout history. Are there bad actors out there? Sure. Some. Let's arrest them! But you can't shut down the internet because someone once did a drug deal over it, or ban cars because 37K americans a year are killed in them (a tiny fraction far outweighed by the benefits to society of automobiles). Likewise, shutting down sites (which just happen to be favored among men) because somewhere in the world, some kid got touched by a pedophile is silly. Did we shut the catholic church down? They are FAR bigger abusers - and they didn't use the internet. Neither did Sandusky. And why do i rarely hear about little GIRLS being raped? You do hear about it, but maybe 1/100th as much as you hear little boys being fucked by men. Sorry, but that says to me that pedo's are much more of a problem in the gay community than society is allowed to discuss. [/QUOTE]

Verification