Female CEO Email Meltdown

[Duke Castile]

Actually, what we have here is a case of older jealous spinster vs young entitled bitch trying to get things for free.

It's funny when females nasty nature collides.

Tuthmosis wrote a piece about women being obsessed with getting things for free if I recall correctly.

I actually agree with the older woman. This girl offers zero but expects to waltz in and get contacts without having done anything.

 

[R Smoov]

This is a great Pokemon battle.

 

[samsamsam]

The girl who blasted Kelly Blazek on social media, Diana Mekota, is just as bad or worse. Blazek was providing a free service to the public. But Mekota just destroyed that service for everyone else to satisfy her need to be coddled and pampered like a princess.

Lots of us in the professional world have been treated rudely. When it happens, you learn from it and move on. A person who publicly seeks revenge is a terrible employee. Period.

Would you hire Mekota? You know that the first time that little princess feels mistreated, she will start drama. She is worse than Kelly Blazek (who isn't exactly admirable).

Very good point, if you hired her, you would be worried about her blasting internal company info on the internet.

Life has been made too easy (in some respects) because of the internet. Old school networking would have been a formal letter introducing oneself and asking for maybe an informational interview/questions etc, and gradually earn some points from the senior person who may then want to help.

Networking is important, no doubt, but it isn't just inviting someone to join their linkedin network.

I have spoken among friends about how the younger generation deals with people in power. Generally, older people don't like slang in business (or any) conversations. Many have a preference for a little formality/humility when dealing with them. For the most part, this does not exist with young people. They are not taught protocol and worse yet they have the "the way I see the world, is the way the world is" mentality. I never grew up that way, I knew there was always something to learn and that I might be missing some data. It was a way of keeping me hungry and focused.

Makes me think of the "who you know thread" http://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-32865.html.

 

[jamaicabound]

So who's gonna troll her?

Lol, I was just thinking about sending her a linked in request and encouraging everyone I know to do the same. Hopefully people she works with sees how she behaves and decides that is not someone they want to do business with.

 

[AnonymousBosch]

I have spoken among friends about how the younger generation deals with people in power. Generally, older people don't like slang in business (or any) conversations. Many have a preference for a little formality/humility when dealing with them. For the most part, this does not exist with young people. They are not taught protocol and worse yet they have the "the way I see the world, is the way the world is" mentality. I never grew up that way, I knew there was always something to learn and that I might be missing some data. It was a way of keeping me hungry and focused.

I was reading interesting research a couple of weeks back on the degradation of IQ: the theory being formed from the results wasn't that IQ degrades with age, as previously-thought, but that it degrades when we stop learning and accumulating new knowledge.

Now think of the uncurious nature of your average 20 year old, who thinks they know everything there is to know, and refuses to challenge their beliefs through investigation and experience.

It could also possibly explain why so many women lack mental maturity, and stay in a high-school mindset forever, particularly if they go into university fields that require blind acceptance of dogmatic thought, rather than critical thinking, such as Women's Studies. Look at the moronic nature of Buzzfeed, the dominant user group being university-educated women, and ask yourself what they're learning in their downtime. Women of moderately-above-average intelligence, actively making themselves dumber.

To my mind, IQ is simply a measure of potential horsepower anyway, and not, as too many people think, concrete intelligence. Use it or lose it.

 

[Suits]

The bitch female CEO's behaviour is very unprofessional, but the larger problem here is young people hearing "networking is important" and believing that they can approach it like a school assignment.

The academic world has taught our young people to approach everything like a check list.

This one and done approach, perpetrated by the semester system, rather than an emphasis on on-going learning and skills improvement, means that university graduates don't have a proper understanding about how real life happens, how meaningful business relations are formed and how to grow value.

Students graduate and think that networking should be like searching for books to reference in their next essay.

 

[samsamsam]

To my mind, IQ is simply a measure of potential horsepower anyway, and not, as too many people think, concrete intelligence. Use it or lose it.

Agreed.

Makes me think of something I heard, "the day you stop learning is the day you start dying."

 

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

To my mind, IQ is simply a measure of potential horsepower anyway, and not, as too many people think, concrete intelligence. Use it or lose it.

Agreed.

Makes me think of something I heard, "the day you stop learning is the day you start dying."

Something like that, yes. IQ (as in intelligence) is heavily modified by other factors, the main being wisdom.

 

[eradicator]

Actually, what we have here is a case of older jealous spinster vs young entitled bitch trying to get things for free.

It's funny when females nasty nature collides.

Tuthmosis wrote a piece about women being obsessed with getting things for free if I recall correctly.

I actually agree with the older woman. This girl offers zero but expects to waltz in and get contacts without having done anything.

Yeah, it isn't even a question of 'which one would win' because they both lose

 

[Suits]

Actually, what we have here is a case of older jealous spinster vs young entitled bitch trying to get things for free.

It's funny when females nasty nature collides.

Tuthmosis wrote a piece about women being obsessed with getting things for free if I recall correctly.

I actually agree with the older woman. This girl offers zero but expects to waltz in and get contacts without having done anything.

Yeah, it isn't even a question of 'which one would win' because they both lose

Ultimately, this is how equality will play out in the workforce for women. As soon as they stop having to stay on their toes to compete with men, they'll be their own undoing.

Women aren't made for the public sphere.

Without the risk of discipline at the hands of a man or men, they'll do whatever their childish minds tell them to.

 

[MikeCF]

Actually, what we have here is a case of older jealous spinster vs young entitled bitch trying to get things for free.

It's funny when females nasty nature collides.

Tuthmosis wrote a piece about women being obsessed with getting things for free if I recall correctly.

I actually agree with the older woman. This girl offers zero but expects to waltz in and get contacts without having done anything.

This. The old woman wasn't very cool to send that email.

But her email is true.

The girl is trying to get something for nothing.

 

[Don Juan Tenorio]

What [Gloria] Steinem and many of her peers in the Second Wave feminist movement preached was that women were innately, intuitively opposed to war. At the height of the Vietnam era, the women’s liberation movement and the antiwar movement were cross-pollinating, forming hybrid ideologies. The idea that grew from this period and gained ascendency in popular media representations of feminism and 'women's lib' - the versions of feminist zeitgeist I saw on TV as a girl - was that women were natural pacifists. If women had been running the world, the argument went, the war would have never happened.

http://beamsandstruts.com/articles/...omen-leaders-and-the-cult-of-the-goddess-pt-1

 

[Ziltoid]

Another article I found.
http://www.cleveland.com/business/i...h_an_apology_and_the_hashtag_letcitydown.html

She literally ends all her emails with the same line, "Go join the other job bank in town, oh yeah, there isn't another one. Don't ever email me again."

"Don't contact me again", the basic template of a text a lot of us have received from women, women that get off on the little power trip being on the giving end of rejection gives them.

This is a perfect case study in why women should never be allowed to hold positions of power. This dumb bitch managed to secure a little niche for herself that gives her some power, and she loves every minute of lording it over people and exercising needless, harsh rejections.
I can't even imagine what it must be like to work under a female boss...

That Web page you linked doesn't come up anymore. But good research anyway. I did a search on the Cleveland.com site and it looks like they've done a bunch of articles on her: http://search.cleveland.com/kelly+blazek/

The most recent story has an account of a guy she wrote the same thing to. At least she's an equal opportunity bitch. (Link removed because their direct links don't work, for some reason, but you can access all the stories clicking on that search link above.)

I was once going to propose writing a ROK article saying the reason women don't succeed in business is they can't let go of their high school "mean girl" bitchiness, so both men and women learn to avoid women in business. If I decide to write that, this will be Exhibit A.

By the way, men usually can't behave like this in the business world for the same reason they can't get away with it in high school: when the day ends, you wind up with Max from the football team putting his fist in your face (an actual example from high school -- luckily I was not on the receiving end of that fist).

Here's another potential source for you, saw this posted on reddit.

"Women In Academia Are Less Likely Than Men To Cooperate With Lower-Ranked Colleagues"

Comments on that article are refreshingly red pill, but they were predictable hamsterized on Reddit.

Several people are running with the idea that this means that women are less cooperative than men but that's only one interpretation..."

 

[PeterAndrewNolan]

I guess she does not realise that you can hide your contacts from other contacts...which is what I do.

 

[Vaun]

The job seeker may have crafted her outreach poorly, i.e. not offering any value, but this is the worst image you can project of you and your organization. She deserves all of the negative press she gets, often these 'marketing' people are the least socially aware. As if people in Cleveland can act like they are on a high horse in regards to job creation and employment, negative arrogant attitudes like this are what took that city and state down.

 

[turkishcandy]

When I first read ''"Love the sense of entitlement in your generation. And therefore I enjoy denying your invite," part, I thought the CEO was a man and we were praising him for giving a lesson to yet another self-entitled girl. It reminded me very much of the CEO's reply to pretty girl looking for rich husband https://plus.google.com/113586474616634226716/posts/81fmXSswxYr .

Then I realized the CEO is woman and is being put down for her rude manners. Sure she deserves a lot of criticism for her tone, but firstly, aren't we siding with the self-entitled girl by critisizing the CEO? and secondly, would our reaction be the same if the CEO who wrote the letter happened to be a man?

 

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

When I first read ''"Love the sense of entitlement in your generation. And therefore I enjoy denying your invite," part, I thought the CEO was a man and we were praising him for giving a lesson to yet another self-entitled girl. It reminded me very much of the CEO's reply to pretty girl looking for rich husband https://plus.google.com/113586474616634226716/posts/81fmXSswxYr .

Then I realized the CEO is woman and is being put down for her rude manners. Sure she deserves a lot of criticism for her tone, but firstly, aren't we siding with the self-entitled girl by critisizing the CEO? and secondly, would our reaction be the same if the CEO who wrote the letter happened to be a man?

Yes.

The issue here isn't the core of the reply, but the humiliating tone with which it was delivered. The CEO who responded to the gold-digging girl merely stated objective facts in a neutral way. He didn't add "your generation is full of dumb whores like you" at the end.

I admit that some bias is possible, but these two cases seem rather different.

 

[Ziltoid]

When I first read ''"Love the sense of entitlement in your generation. And therefore I enjoy denying your invite," part, I thought the CEO was a man and we were praising him for giving a lesson to yet another self-entitled girl. It reminded me very much of the CEO's reply to pretty girl looking for rich husband https://plus.google.com/113586474616634226716/posts/81fmXSswxYr .

Then I realized the CEO is woman and is being put down for her rude manners. Sure she deserves a lot of criticism for her tone, but firstly, aren't we siding with the self-entitled girl by critisizing the CEO? and secondly, would our reaction be the same if the CEO who wrote the letter happened to be a man?

What man can you picture writing what this woman wrote?
I've met some passive aggressive little bitches in my time (hell, I used to BE one) and I literally cannot imagine this email coming from a dude.

 

[Bad Hussar]

Wow. That is a very unprofessional response. Immediate termination if she were working for me. Let the lawsuits fall were they will.

Is the Cleveland Job Bank a publicly funded organisation? If so she is using public funds and is duty bound to help out jobseekers from that city. If it is a private group she operates herself she can do and say what she wants, but this response will mean she will have no more paying clients from now on.

As to her being a woman. Yes, I've seen this kind of behavior from older female professionals towards younger women. It is cringeingly embarrassing when it goes down in public. The older woman really doesn't realise that absolutely everyone watching the situation can see that her negativity is 100% due to her sexual jealousy of the younger woman. There must be some hard core chemicals flowing through their brains to make them that blind to themselves. It's unbelievable.