Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
Female F-16 pilot recounts her role on 911
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="911" data-source="post: 1130930" data-attributes="member: 11221"><p>Curtains, Occam's Razor should be about science, statistics and reality, not emotion. Good propaganda like the kind used in the OP's article uses a strong emotional pull to sidestep objectivity and build up its hero narrative:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, either you believe in Freedom, The Constitution of the United States, Our way of life. Mom, baseball, apple pie, or you're "a conspiracy nut" *. </p><p></p><p>If you really wanted to apply Occam's Razor on an objective plane, you'd have realized that the odds of placing a single cellphone call in 2001 from a commercial flight are virtually nil. Yet the official reports claimed that 10 cellphone calls were placed from Flight 93, including the "let's roll" Todd Beamer call.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.globalresearch.ca/phone-calls-from-the-9-11-airliners/16924" target="_blank">https://www.globalresearch.ca/phone-calls-from-the-9-11-airliners/16924</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>So what Occam's Razor should really tell you here is that the "Let's Roll" cellphone story is most likely fake. Your emotions on the other hand compel you to believe the patriotic hero narrative at face value. You didn't buy the F16 lady hero narrative here, because your rational feminism BS filter made you skeptical. There was no such filter with the bigger picture of Flight 93 and other 9/11 facts though...</p><p></p><p></p><p>*"Conspiracy theory" btw is <a href="https://www.globalresearch.ca/conspiracy-theory-foundations-of-a-weaponized-term/5319708" target="_blank">a weaponized NLP tool developed by the CIA in the 1960s to keep the masses in line after the groundswell of disbelief that came with the Warren Commission</a>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="911, post: 1130930, member: 11221"] Curtains, Occam's Razor should be about science, statistics and reality, not emotion. Good propaganda like the kind used in the OP's article uses a strong emotional pull to sidestep objectivity and build up its hero narrative: So, either you believe in Freedom, The Constitution of the United States, Our way of life. Mom, baseball, apple pie, or you're "a conspiracy nut" *. If you really wanted to apply Occam's Razor on an objective plane, you'd have realized that the odds of placing a single cellphone call in 2001 from a commercial flight are virtually nil. Yet the official reports claimed that 10 cellphone calls were placed from Flight 93, including the "let's roll" Todd Beamer call. [URL]https://www.globalresearch.ca/phone-calls-from-the-9-11-airliners/16924[/URL] So what Occam's Razor should really tell you here is that the "Let's Roll" cellphone story is most likely fake. Your emotions on the other hand compel you to believe the patriotic hero narrative at face value. You didn't buy the F16 lady hero narrative here, because your rational feminism BS filter made you skeptical. There was no such filter with the bigger picture of Flight 93 and other 9/11 facts though... *"Conspiracy theory" btw is [url=https://www.globalresearch.ca/conspiracy-theory-foundations-of-a-weaponized-term/5319708]a weaponized NLP tool developed by the CIA in the 1960s to keep the masses in line after the groundswell of disbelief that came with the Warren Commission[/url]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
Female F-16 pilot recounts her role on 911
Top