Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
Female F-16 pilot recounts her role on 911
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="911" data-source="post: 1130951" data-attributes="member: 11221"><p>Just out of curiosity Repo (and others fully on board with official 9/11 narrative), do you also believe in the official version for the JFK assassination too (Lee Oswald single gun theory)?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Muddying the waters is a very good way to put it Len. They would usually combine elements of truth with some outrageous features that "poison the well", see Icke's exposing the Saville story, the private/Rothschild-owned fractional reserve debt system and slapping the reptilian shape-shifting crap on top of it...poison pill. </p><p></p><p>Along the same lines, the "no plane" thing is partially true too, because there was no plane hitting the Pentagon (unless you believe a Boeing could pull 5gs on a tight 270 turn and fly 6m off the ground at 800km/hr smack into the first floor, where the entire plane, wings, engines and tail, collapsed into a small hole leaving nearby glass windows unscathed). And there was no plane on the Shankville dirt pile either, so "no plane" is exactly half right, 2 out of 4. You take that base of truth, then slap that "no plane hit the WTC" poison pill on top of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="911, post: 1130951, member: 11221"] Just out of curiosity Repo (and others fully on board with official 9/11 narrative), do you also believe in the official version for the JFK assassination too (Lee Oswald single gun theory)? Muddying the waters is a very good way to put it Len. They would usually combine elements of truth with some outrageous features that "poison the well", see Icke's exposing the Saville story, the private/Rothschild-owned fractional reserve debt system and slapping the reptilian shape-shifting crap on top of it...poison pill. Along the same lines, the "no plane" thing is partially true too, because there was no plane hitting the Pentagon (unless you believe a Boeing could pull 5gs on a tight 270 turn and fly 6m off the ground at 800km/hr smack into the first floor, where the entire plane, wings, engines and tail, collapsed into a small hole leaving nearby glass windows unscathed). And there was no plane on the Shankville dirt pile either, so "no plane" is exactly half right, 2 out of 4. You take that base of truth, then slap that "no plane hit the WTC" poison pill on top of it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
Female F-16 pilot recounts her role on 911
Top