Alpha_Romeo
Kingfisher
This is the headline from the article posted by BBC News (mainstream news outlet).
I have to ask, why is using the word "gay" relevant? It is not even known or confirmed that the attack was a hate crime against gays. It could have been a jilted (gay) lover taking his or her revenge. No one really knows at this point.
When a tragedy occurs at a normal nightclub, does the media report, "Fire at heterosexual nightclub"? No, because it's irrelevant, and what's more ridiculous.
Don't get me wrong, the loss of life is tragic under these type of circumstances, but media does a disservice to such events and the victims when it tries to play on public emotions, fears, and resentment. This is just irresponsible, in my opinion.
Link to article: http://www.bbc.com/news/36510272
I have to ask, why is using the word "gay" relevant? It is not even known or confirmed that the attack was a hate crime against gays. It could have been a jilted (gay) lover taking his or her revenge. No one really knows at this point.
When a tragedy occurs at a normal nightclub, does the media report, "Fire at heterosexual nightclub"? No, because it's irrelevant, and what's more ridiculous.
Don't get me wrong, the loss of life is tragic under these type of circumstances, but media does a disservice to such events and the victims when it tries to play on public emotions, fears, and resentment. This is just irresponsible, in my opinion.
Link to article: http://www.bbc.com/news/36510272