Forbes article: Drunk Female Guests Are The Gravest Threat To Fraternities

Status
Not open for further replies.

alexdagr81

Woodpecker
Switch said:
We should all write to forbes and try to get them to re-instate Frezza. I wonder what his response will be.

And even though the guy already sounds pretty red-pill, getting removed as a contributor might push him over whatever edges he hasn't already gone over. Hell, let's get him on the forum

Edit:

From Jezebel's response to the article, one of the top comments

"This whole article is absurd in its fixation on drunk women, as if that has anything to do with the problem of sexual assualt on college campuses. It simply does not."

:mindblown:

http://jezebel.com/frat-alumni-president-blames-drunk-female-guests-for-ru-1638524129/all

Read the comments section if you feel like a good dose of illogical hamstering.

from the same broad:

However, his reasoning behind his ideas is beyond fucked. Don't take a drunk woman into your bedroom because she might falsely accuse you of rape? Don't even let drunk women into your party because they have tempting boobs of satan designed to torture your pure soul?

Can we please step away from the "MEN CAN'T CONTROL THEIR WILD ERECTIONS SO IF THEY ASSAULT YOU IT'S NOT THEIR FAULT" theory? Guys. You aren't 3 month old puppy dogs. You can control your actions. I promise! Women aren't that powerful.

She started off kind of good, until she came with this ironically serious statement. God forbid she hold women to the same standards of self-control.
 

Kabal

Pelican
Gold Member
Sp5 said:
An absolutely true piece, and I wonder why it was taken off the site.

samsamsam said:
In our age of sexual equality, why drunk female students are almost never characterized as irresponsible jerks is a question I leave to the feminists.

cfckg.jpg

handle-the-truth.gif
 

Mentavious

Hummingbird
Gold Member
As I said in the other thread, females cannot handle alcohol at fraternity parties or any other social event. When given for free (which happens many times at fraternity parties) they completely lose control and become belligerently drunk. Having to pick up girls from floors, toilets, tap them out, having to look after them, call a can and make sure they get home is a every night event when a sorority comes over. These girls can't hold their liquor as they try to keep up with the boys so they end up puking everywhere. Not only that but the disrespect they show for the venue that they are invite to is downright pathetic.

As a former risk manager one of the largest fraternities in the U.S. I can't tell you how many times I've seen incidents of fines, suspensions, or reprimand from the university on fraternities due to the ratchetness these sorority girl exume. You can't let these girls get to drunk because if something happens to them (getting sick or passing out and hitting her head) then it's on you. These white knights are out for blood.

Don't even get me started on the looseness and drug use of these girls also. If you marry a former sorority girl from a southern school then I will be waiting for you in the courts with no sympathy.
 

AnonymousBosch

 
Banned
Gold Member
Sp5 said:
An absolutely true piece, and I wonder why it was taken off the site.

It's about men putting their own interests and future before that of a woman and her feeeeeelings.

The reaction is predictable. There is no pleasing a woman. Giving in to her demands is a waste of your time because she will always find a way to complain about getting exactly what she said she wanted.
 

Kabal

Pelican
Gold Member
Mentavious said:
Don't even get me started on the looseness and drug use of these girls also. If you marry a former sorority girl from a southern school then I will be waiting for you in the courts with no sympathy.

I am a former fraternity member and I generally disagree on the sorority girl stereotype of being incredibly slutty and whatnot.

Sorority girls may be slightly sluttier than GDI's on average... but the sluttiest chicks and the biggest groupies were always GDI's.
 

Slim Shady

 
Banned
Gold Member
One of the white knight/ male feminist kids I know posted the Jezebel response to this on his FB. I just responded saying that the original article was spot on. The short haired outrage has already started...
 

MdWanderer

Pelican
Gold Member
iop890 said:
I get out all my partying in other countries. Then switch exclusively to day and online game and only get drunk around friends.

I can truly say that my biggest regret in life was not traveling enough during college, and beating my head against the wall trying to crack the American social code. Even back then I knew foreign women were superior in every way and had a blast the few times I left the country, but was more focused on climbing the ladder in my frat and gaming sorority sluts than traveling and stacking paper.

I joined a house during my college years and while I will always look back fondly on my time there, I must say it was risky from a female standpoint. You had to know what you were doing when it came to girls, because you had suddenly hundreds of people knowing your business if you didnt. I took far more risks game wise and was much bolder out of the Greek system than inside of it.
 

xpatplayer

Kingfisher
That article was too honest. Nobody can handle the truth nowadays. I had a discussion with my chapter brothers - they said it was brilliant. We want to drink, party and bang sluts and kicking drunk whores out is the best way to ensure we don't get in deep shit.

I may do a post/ submit an article to RoK on why the attack on fraternities indicates the death of American values. Fraternities are essentially a breeding ground for future leaders and prove that synergy works wonders. The person I was as a pledge and the person I am now are completely different. Take away Greek Life and you take away many men's chance of becoming better versions of themselves.

But feminists do tend to attack men deemed attractive, because they hate masculinity with a strong vigor. Even if colleges do ban fraternities, they will continue to exist as secret organizations. No way in hell a lot of them are selling/ renting out houses to GDIs. And they will maintain chapters even when fraternities are banned, it'll just be without letters outside the house or on clothes.
 

Mentavious

Hummingbird
Gold Member
Kabal said:
Mentavious said:
Don't even get me started on the looseness and drug use of these girls also. If you marry a former sorority girl from a southern school then I will be waiting for you in the courts with no sympathy.

I am a former fraternity member and I generally disagree on the sorority girl stereotype of being incredibly slutty and whatnot.

Sorority girls may be slightly sluttier than GDI's on average... but the sluttiest chicks and the biggest groupies were always GDI's.

I'll say this....I know of several girls that were passed around from guy to guy during my time. Girls that were called president slayers, etc etc. Independents slut it up with everyone but many sorority girls would only fuck guys in fraternities and even certain fraternities for some of them.
 

Hades

 
Banned
Kabal said:
Mentavious said:
Don't even get me started on the looseness and drug use of these girls also. If you marry a former sorority girl from a southern school then I will be waiting for you in the courts with no sympathy.

I am a former fraternity member and I generally disagree on the sorority girl stereotype of being incredibly slutty and whatnot.

Sorority girls may be slightly sluttier than GDI's on average... but the sluttiest chicks and the biggest groupies were always GDI's.

I'm inclined to agree. Sororities are hesitant to invite a serious power slut into their fold.

xpatplayer said:
Even if colleges do ban fraternities, they will continue to exist as secret organizations. No way in hell a lot of them are selling/ renting out houses to GDIs. And they will maintain chapters even when fraternities are banned, it'll just be without letters outside the house or on clothes.

My college had a lot of bullshit rules about drinking that drove nearly all the good parties off campus anyway. Campus security in general were bigger assholes than even cops.
 

Handsome Creepy Eel

Owl
Catholic
Gold Member
It's incredible that the reaction to this article was so sudden and violent. This is one of the most polite and reasoned articles that I have ever read! It treads extremely carefully not to offend anyone and always insists on not judging anyone, but even so the author was sacked. It's ludicrous. Our society is truly fucked up...
 

bojangles

Crow
Gold Member
This guy needs our support. I'm going to email Forbes asking why they had deleted an honest article and fired a writer for his honest thoughts, where is their integrity, are they journalists or click baiting whores
 

It_is_my_time

Crow
Protestant
There is certainly some larger players behind all of this. I think this goes above the feminists we all know and hate, if such a well respected journalist gets fired for something so well written and so well thought out.
 

Ziltoid

Pelican
Will there ever be any mainstream pushback to this pseudo-Orwellian bullshit? Seriously, fucking Forbes? Who falls next, Wall Street Journal, National Review?

I'm beginning to think that conservatives, libertarians, and even moderates will not get their shit together and start elbowing for their rhetoric and viewpoints to be respected, and the door will simply close forever.

R.I.P. freedom of speech and journalist integrity, 1791 - 20??
 

It_is_my_time

Crow
Protestant
Ziltoid said:
Will there ever be any mainstream pushback to this pseudo-Orwellian bullshit? Seriously, fucking Forbes? Who falls next, Wall Street Journal, National Review?

I'm beginning to think that conservatives, libertarians, and even moderates will not get their shit together and start elbowing for their rhetoric and viewpoints to be respected, and the door will simply close forever.

R.I.P. freedom of speech and journalist integrity, 1791 - 20??

The major media outlets are all owned by a small few select corporations.

So while some have a left spin or a right spin, they all answer to th same boss.

And for whatever reason, the same boss is pushing this anti-family/anti-male rhetoric and an alarming pace. I think there are bigger players at the table, and they are hidden from view and let the feminists do their dirty work. What is their purpose is the real question.

To destroy the family and stop the world from being over populated? Then just be honest about it and give men a sexual outlet in the form of prostitution so kids are not born but men are less violent and desperate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top