It_is_my_time said:
And for whatever reason, the same boss is pushing this anti-family/anti-male rhetoric and an alarming pace. I think there are bigger players at the table, and they are hidden from view and let the feminists do their dirty work. What is their purpose is the real question.
To destroy the family and stop the world from being over populated? Then just be honest about it and give men a sexual outlet in the form of prostitution so kids are not born but men are less violent and desperate.
It's based much more in practical rather than ideological reasons. Women are mass consumers of cosmetics, luxury handbags, cars, homes, etc.. Men are consumers too but single men as a demographic tend to pale in comparison to single women when it comes to mass consumerism. Traditional print media is all about advertising and the online model is still about advertising for the most part. Single women are a significant growing consumer demographic for nonsense shit coming from huffington post, Times, etc.. Thus anything that alienates this important goose laying the golden eggs also risks alienating dozens of corporate sponsors who keep the lights on.
Maybe one or more of the forum posters who has worked in mainstream print media can comment more on this. This is the main cause I see.
The other is that english speaking countries have an excess of SWPL female liberal arts majors. All these people are incapable of dealing with the real world and are always "literally shaking" so they wash out of the productive labor force. So they end up in academia or they reinvent themselves and get hired into mainstream media as "journalists" where they get to spew diarrhea to the masses from their pieholes.
