Weird sex stuff 10 years ago, then why do they bring it up now?
Ok this is my last AT related comment I'll make so pay attention:
No, it's been weird sex stuff constantly. He got kicked out of Big Brother (which only hardcore attention-addicted degenerate e-celebs do, by the way) because he had some weird hardcore sex vid going on where he appeared to hit a woman. Afterwards it was claimed that the whole thing was consensual, but who even knows afterwards and the general rule is, if you get into ambiguous situations enough, several people will develop serious hatred for you. If you make that your whole personality, cheers. It's the same with women who whore around and then get raped or beat up and nobody even knows what's up. He definitely had those girls at his house, which is inappropriate, and who knows under which circumstances they made statements after that. Like, it's a good way to get plenty of people legitimately pissed at you.
Something you might not know is that the Romanian Police doesn't really interfere in Political Correctness stuff. There is corruption, definitely, but to the degree that it's easier to imagine the Politia as a separate clan ruling the country. During Covid, they barely enforced the rules in most areas of the country. Culturally, they are a lot closer to the people than for example British police. They will beat up gypsy cliques who make fun of them, they will act blind if they feel sympathy for someone or play nice when they get bribed. Basically, the standard model in most countries. Arresting people for chauvinistic attitudes simply isn't a thing in Romania (yet), and whenever the Western media tries to cook up outrage, basically none of the male citizens buy into it. AT's attitude regarding jabs was tailored to his Western audience, because in Romania it would hardly have been an outstanding move, since barely even half of the people got the jab.
Again: Tate has played it safe, always
. He is not "daring" in any way to anyone who isn't deeply infected with normie culture. Maybe you are unfamiliar with the manosphere, but if you check out Kevin Samuels or fresh & fit, they said the exact same stuff for years and with great success, unbanned. He just emulated what they said word for word with no new info, but with a different media strategy. He has never, not a single time, gone against the tribe. I repeat myself, but he paid careful attention not to associate with "toxic people" such as Nick Fuentes and some others, none of his viral clips contain any relevant redpills. Mohammed Hijab, who appearently converted him or at least was instrumental in that process, is very careful to use anti-white "anticolonial" rhetoric and works with Jews who can even join his CS Dawah team (it's all good as long as you go against Christians), who do fun stuff like threatening to rape the wives of Christian apologists after they lose their debates. I do not see even a single indicator of him being counter anything in any meaningful way. When he first got attacked by media outlets, he even went as far as to pound on his "mixed race" heritage and that he was being treated in a racist manner, a 180 of what he usually claims to think about the matter.
Regarding my bias, yeah, I'm not crazy about him and his brother living like leaches off the country of my ancestors and deflowering virgins who then become e-thots and then bragging about it. But I think I have the maturity to separate that from my other insights.
And my core insight: This dude is an NPC and a normie and he has exactly(!
) zero genuine insights into anything. He knows nothing about the Religion he joined, having done so very publicly, he has spent most of his life trying to force people to pay attention to him, and only recently had actually success with it. He is a supposedly heterosexual version of Milo, only that Milo said some actually funny stuff.
What especially grinds my gears about him is that he his like a whorish woman, that is, a time sponge. He forces attention, he creates ten narratives at once so that people will have something to debate, while he is probably one of the least interesting people on the planet once you cut out the social media mirage. The man is smoke and mirrors, and his online image suggests that there is more to him, but in reality, there is nothing to him. Nothing about him is more interesting than the embellished stories he spreads online. A guy like Tate is the best "counter position" the elites can imagine, because it's impractical and cartoonish and based entirely on hypersexuality.
I saw a video of him once where he walked next to MMA fighter Sean O'Malley, trying to convince him to travel with him around Romania and checking out the ladies and partying, and then when Sean didn't react, he mentioned that, of course, they would also visit Churches, because they are "men of God". He looked like a 13 year old gay grade schooler trying to impress older kids, despite him being middle aged at this point. Just to illustrate how pathetic and overall cringe he is as a person. As a rule of thumb, anyone who has moved beyond his 30s and is still trying to impress strangers is untrustworthy, especially if he tries to do so by material means, which are the first things that can be taken away from you. Truly upstanding people do not feel that need, because they understand that luxury is a hindrance to growth.
Taking him serious is like taking Caitlyn Jenner serious. Maybe the next time he gets arrested for drunk driving we should alert the public as to the matrix trying to get him. He's "a traditional girl" after all, and totally a conservative republican.
I'd dare you to show me a single thought or idea he has ever presented that isn't either stale or meaningless or destructive, but again, I will not even once again engage in anything with his name attached to it because he's the bottom of the barrel trash and on a highway to hell and dragging others with him.