That's the reason that was given. I see no reason to disbelieve it.
Forum "Lounge" - Everything goes!
- Thread starter Vicious
- Start date
It's unfortunate that he's turned to Islam rather that Christianity, I think it has more to do with that. But he seems to be a truth seeker, so he might come around eventually.
It is NOT the Assange thing. Can you tell me one relevant thing Tate has said that would be "anti-establishment", outside of women being inferior to men?
The MSM also complained about Jordan Peterson, who is a confirmed ZOG shill. They pumped him up because he was a good caricature of the opposing side, without actually contributing anything of substance. Tate literally didn't want to associate with Nick Fuentes, because that would have been "too hot" for him, according to Sneako (who is way more based). People hate him because he's obnoxious and forces his face into everybody's sight, and produces regular, run-of-the-mill, luxury tiktoks. The man is not counter culture at all. Even his women thing still basically promotes the idea that men should do everything to shoot for female approval, basically very stale PUA stuff that Roosh was known for 7 years ago. I'm not aware of him having broken any stories, given out any valuable inside knowledge about anything.
E. Michael Jones, Ryan Dawson and Andrew Anglin have basically been scrubbed from the mainstream internet, why wouldn't that have happened to him? When will Anglin be featured on Piers Morgan? He created a site that became one of the most viewed on the right within less than 2 years, certainly worth an invitation. But he's basically been turned into a non-person. Exactly the opposite with Tate. You cannot even google Romania without his inbred-looking head being plastered all over the display. Exactly the same with Jordan Peterson. Search for Logos and you'll see him on a stage crying because Jews are so awesome. They pump up average and controllable figures in order to shift the Overton window in their direction. And the love Pick-Up-Artist content because sex sells, and women and children will get exited about it and click the link and watch the commercials. Not everybody who gets attacked is "on our side". The media apparatus frequently ostracizes people just for the heck of it, because they are pharisees and love to do that.
Tate has had legal problems because of weird sex stuff for 10 years, because he has an obsession and gets himself into murky situations.
That was a lot to unpack, but let's not mix JP into this, I never liked him anyway. I think you're a bit biased though. AT has been censored to a large extent and if the Romanians were just tired of being associated with him, they could easily have expelled him and not have this major trial. Weird sex stuff 10 years ago, then why do they bring it up now?
They (MSM) don't like him mainly due to the gender relations thing as you mentioned, but that is not a small issue either. It's integral to their plans in relation to depopulation and so on. He has also spoken up on vaccine mandates etc. (1) The people who tend to get banned full stop and for all time are the one's the go after our friends from the holy land.
Highly recommend this clip from an interview with 90s rapper 'Krayzie Bone' who lays out the truth of HipHop and why it was pushed.
Hint: there's a lot of (((money))) to be made by owning shares in private prisons.
Last edited:
Ok this is my last AT related comment I'll make so pay attention:
No, it's been weird sex stuff constantly. He got kicked out of Big Brother (which only hardcore attention-addicted degenerate e-celebs do, by the way) because he had some weird hardcore sex vid going on where he appeared to hit a woman. Afterwards it was claimed that the whole thing was consensual, but who even knows afterwards and the general rule is, if you get into ambiguous situations enough, several people will develop serious hatred for you. If you make that your whole personality, cheers. It's the same with women who whore around and then get raped or beat up and nobody even knows what's up. He definitely had those girls at his house, which is inappropriate, and who knows under which circumstances they made statements after that. Like, it's a good way to get plenty of people legitimately pissed at you.
Something you might not know is that the Romanian Police doesn't really interfere in Political Correctness stuff. There is corruption, definitely, but to the degree that it's easier to imagine the Politia as a separate clan ruling the country. During Covid, they barely enforced the rules in most areas of the country. Culturally, they are a lot closer to the people than for example British police. They will beat up gypsy cliques who make fun of them, they will act blind if they feel sympathy for someone or play nice when they get bribed. Basically, the standard model in most countries. Arresting people for chauvinistic attitudes simply isn't a thing in Romania (yet), and whenever the Western media tries to cook up outrage, basically none of the male citizens buy into it. AT's attitude regarding jabs was tailored to his Western audience, because in Romania it would hardly have been an outstanding move, since barely even half of the people got the jab.
Again: Tate has played it safe, always . He is not "daring" in any way to anyone who isn't deeply infected with normie culture. Maybe you are unfamiliar with the manosphere, but if you check out Kevin Samuels or fresh & fit, they said the exact same stuff for years and with great success, unbanned. He just emulated what they said word for word with no new info, but with a different media strategy. He has never, not a single time, gone against the tribe. I repeat myself, but he paid careful attention not to associate with "toxic people" such as Nick Fuentes and some others, none of his viral clips contain any relevant redpills. Mohammed Hijab, who appearently converted him or at least was instrumental in that process, is very careful to use anti-white "anticolonial" rhetoric and works with Jews who can even join his CS Dawah team (it's all good as long as you go against Christians), who do fun stuff like threatening to rape the wives of Christian apologists after they lose their debates. I do not see even a single indicator of him being counter anything in any meaningful way. When he first got attacked by media outlets, he even went as far as to pound on his "mixed race" heritage and that he was being treated in a racist manner, a 180 of what he usually claims to think about the matter.
Regarding my bias, yeah, I'm not crazy about him and his brother living like leaches off the country of my ancestors and deflowering virgins who then become e-thots and then bragging about it. But I think I have the maturity to separate that from my other insights.
And my core insight: This dude is an NPC and a normie and he has exactly(!) zero genuine insights into anything. He knows nothing about the Religion he joined, having done so very publicly, he has spent most of his life trying to force people to pay attention to him, and only recently had actually success with it. He is a supposedly heterosexual version of Milo, only that Milo said some actually funny stuff.
What especially grinds my gears about him is that he his like a whorish woman, that is, a time sponge. He forces attention, he creates ten narratives at once so that people will have something to debate, while he is probably one of the least interesting people on the planet once you cut out the social media mirage. The man is smoke and mirrors, and his online image suggests that there is more to him, but in reality, there is nothing to him. Nothing about him is more interesting than the embellished stories he spreads online. A guy like Tate is the best "counter position" the elites can imagine, because it's impractical and cartoonish and based entirely on hypersexuality.
I saw a video of him once where he walked next to MMA fighter Sean O'Malley, trying to convince him to travel with him around Romania and checking out the ladies and partying, and then when Sean didn't react, he mentioned that, of course, they would also visit Churches, because they are "men of God". He looked like a 13 year old gay grade schooler trying to impress older kids, despite him being middle aged at this point. Just to illustrate how pathetic and overall cringe he is as a person. As a rule of thumb, anyone who has moved beyond his 30s and is still trying to impress strangers is untrustworthy, especially if he tries to do so by material means, which are the first things that can be taken away from you. Truly upstanding people do not feel that need, because they understand that luxury is a hindrance to growth.
Taking him serious is like taking Caitlyn Jenner serious. Maybe the next time he gets arrested for drunk driving we should alert the public as to the matrix trying to get him. He's "a traditional girl" after all, and totally a conservative republican.
I'd dare you to show me a single thought or idea he has ever presented that isn't either stale or meaningless or destructive, but again, I will not even once again engage in anything with his name attached to it because he's the bottom of the barrel trash and on a highway to hell and dragging others with him.
Last edited:
I'm not interested enough in this matter to bother reading all of that man. You seem overly emotional in relation to this subject. All I know is that he's spoken, and still speaks the truth on some vital subjects, like covid, feminism etc. I also think he's someone that could turn to Christianity in time, unlike for example Trump, who I find to be 100 percent hedonistic and unlikeable. But that's just my personal feeling on the matter!
Well, you came on advertising him, I told you why that's bad, you don't want to know and keep going. Case closed.
The "weird sex stuff" was MSM fake news which Tate's partner at the time admitted was consensual. Whenever the woke media bring it up they are immediaetly fact checked on twitter & made to look like idiots in the process.
Personally I am in two minds about Tate. I am 100% against his unjust arrest & cancellation, and he says some great things, but he does seem to be a gatekeeper of sorts & is linked with some questionable characters which includes a far eastern inspired hypnotist.
That being said I will always stand against a persons cancellation by the woke feminist lefty crowd even If I dont fully agree with them.
I don't understand the "he says some great things" take. The Steve Martin fake evangelist character in the movie Leap of Faith says some great things as part of his "preaching", but he's a charlatan, and anything he happens to say that is true is completely outweighed by the ways in which he is false. The things he says that are true are just a grift to get away with the fake stuff.
Tate is like this.
Agreed.
It's not easy fighting against the immense globalist control systems in our own ways (like staying V-free, suffering job loss etc) while staying upbeat and positive. I know this for myself and many others. Things have been tough.
That said, most of the Christians I know in real life tend to carry a spirit of hope and goodwill. And we need that lighter touch to carry us through the best and worst of times. Too much stress and negativity makes us physically unwell and in the longer-term contributes to disease, while hopefulness, smiling and laughter is great for our soul, health and relationships.
So for now, of the remaining threads 'post-cleanse', I gotchu fam:
Positivity / Good News Only Lounge
Just like a man needs a positive environment to thrive - not just survive - RVF needs this thread. P.S. to survive in Clown World I recommend some laughter therapy on a daily basis. Some comedy routines curated for RVF members can be found here...
Last edited:
What about personality? Is it real? I've found that as my information and hence views have shifted drastically I'm also becoming a drastically different person behavior wise. This makes me think is personality even real? Is someone introverted or extraverted, is someone hardworking or not, is someone agreeable or not, or do all of these things purely depend on what info you have in your head leading to certain behavioral patterns? For example I grew up without much masculine influence so I developed towards a more agreeable, extraverted and not conscientious kind of guy, which essentially are feminine traits. Now after 7 years of seeking and finding truth I feel like I'm developing exactly towards the opposite of the spectrum, because I now know different info and therefore see the holes in my previous behavior and trying to fix 'm. I'm strongly getting the impression that this whole emphasis of modern psychology on personality is just to keep you in a weak fixed state that you allegedly have no impact on. So yeah you're not conscientious because that's just who you are, not because of your thoughts and/or circumstances which can change with new input. It's also a very feminine paradigm thinking "you ARE someone" and "you're just the way you are". It's a mother to little son frame, but the masculine frame is to develop, break boundaries, transform, move on etc, therefore not being fixed. Love to hear ye lads perspective on this.
Personality is fluid. You are the sum of everything both you and your ancestors ever went through. Ever hear the saying " (blank) will change you"? When you get used to reacting to certain social stimuli, it becomes your default expectation. Then say you end up where people do or do not engage in some custom you're used to, and over time you get used to that. It's a shift in your personality, but you're still you. Maybe you find a different interest, start hanging with different people, and they affect you. It's a shift in your personality, some old friends may even say "you've changed," but you're still you. Still born from the same parents. Still with the memories you have, your beating heart, etc. Say you go through enough of these changes in life. You've become a "different person" in many ways, but you've always maintained certain qualities. Those qualities are what make up your basic personality.
In short, it's real, it's just not that big a deal.
So basically he is a horrible person, but he's really close to changing every single thing in his life, and then he would awesome?
I'm obviously not seeing the appeal in this guy that some people do, and yes, I have listened to some clips of him doing his schtick.
He's right about women at least. I haven't listened to any of the clips I've run into because I couldn't be bothered to, but if he got banned so much and has a fame for being a misogynist, he's probably doing something right.
That's also the only thing muslims are right about.
His song is also goyslop. The woman is singing in French, but sounds like an Arab? Then again, the average French is now an Arab or African.
What does the G stand for?
Right about women is dime a dozen. Some aren't even recent Moslem converts.
That's weak sauce.
Well, that's kind of his appeal I guess. Most Tik Tok zoomers are used to being plugged to e-girls and trannies 24/7, so he's probably the only redpilled person some of them have seen or heard of.