Frenchman claims to have impregnated 600 women in Africa

Samseau

Owl
Gold Member
Manbeline said:
Samseau said:
Manbeline said:
I honestly give him a slow clap. As men, this is what we were made to do. No matter what we say here, his biological body is probably very happy that it got to do what it was created to do.

But why? His children have to suffer for what he did here.

I'd be indifferent if he banged that many and didn't get anyone pregnant. I would ask if he had any standards or what his methods were, but I would not say it is something to be proud of.
I'm just coming at this from a scientific point of view. He sowed his seeds. He's the tomcat that hits and quits it. He's the lion that impregnates the female of his tribe, then goes off to do whatever, likely another one of his harem lioness. Putting aside ethics for one moment, I find it respectful what he did. It's everyman's ideal dream to do a lot of women. He likely didn't do a lot of pretty women, and that's the crime we most likely give him here, but that simply highlights that our own interpretation of it is what we're discussing here, not the ethics of it.

If he had banged a lot of attractive women, he would be considered a celebrity. But since it was just a lot of low tier Africans, he's being bashed.

What is "scientific" about having your children be raised by a single mom? How are you loving them by giving them that existence?
 

VNvet

Kingfisher
Manbeline said:
I honestly give him a slow clap. As men, this is what we were made to do. No matter what we say here, his biological body is probably very happy that it got to do what it was created to do.

Not really.

Humans aren't an r-selected species and we aren't animals. The biggest difference between a human and an animal is rising above our animal urge to fornicate with everything in sight.
 

infowarrior1

Hummingbird
@VNvet

Indeed. The only reason there is so many of us is that we stopped dying so often as we used to. And even back before industrialization our mortality is comparatively much lower than many r-selected organisms.

The reason that many r-selected organisms seem not to overpopulate is predation alongside their general proneness to dying in general. Ensuing continued resource glut that never runs out as they never reach carrying capacity.
 

El Chinito loco

Crow
Gold Member
Do you know what you get when you mix a white Frenchman with blacks?

Haiti.

There's nothing good about this sort of degeneracy. No, Africa won't be improved if you ship in lots of non black dudes with hard dicks who go to town on the women there and produce lots of bastard children.

All you're doing is seeding the country with more despair and on top of that those mulatto kids will just get ruthlessly exploited by the natives with sexual abuse and other ways. I'm a father and the idea of any of my progeny being subjected to this sort of abuse is horrific to me. If you think having lots of kids without being around as a father is "based" then you are a degenerate. Full stop.

Africa as a continent is a wasteland in many ways. It reflects the beginning of humanity and the end of humanity. It's a cesspool of wasted potential and human detritus.

The best thing to do is to just cease all aid and any pretense of supporting any of the corrupt leaders there. Just let them handle their own problems for a few centuries and maybe whatever comes out of the ashes will be better than what it is now. There will be lots of death and destruction for sure but at least through the fire they might be able to forge something new and civilized.

Even if it's not better it can't be much worse. Africa as a continent is just a breeding pool for despair and exotic diseases which gets exported elsewhere in the form of refugees and viral transmission from animals and humans alike.

Barring some apocalyptic event like a giant meteor hitting Africa right square in the center it will not change anytime soon.
 
It seems mathematically unlikely. Having sex with 2 or more women every day for a year would be physically demanding. Finding 1400 pretty women in Africa at a continuous rate of 2 a day also seems difficult. What about lost days due to travel, holidays, power outages, food sickness and other minor illness, etc. And the amount of money spending $40,000 in three months in Togo how??? I think cost wise if you had the stamina to have sex with all these women, you could accomplish it rather inexpensively. Seems pretty obvious this story is not true.
 

eradicator

Peacock
Gold Member
“It’s physically impossible to bang 1400 girls in 2 years”

Ok first off, some of them are going to be pigs. I didn’t read that as having sex with 1400 pretty women. It’s 1400 women.

Could it be done physically? Maybe. Is this dude under the age of 25? Or in his 30s/40s but on trt?

Let’s say we were talking about a female on vacation mode who took a 2 year vacation. And kept moving around some third world shithole, would she be able to have sex with over 1400 men in 2 years? Absolutely, especially if she kept moving around to find new men.

Could a man do it in Africa? It’s a little different for men, I mean biologically. You have to actually get erect 1400 times in 2 years and find 1400 new women across a half dozen African countries .

Dude was a Frenchman with a centrally located apartment in African countries. I’d say definitely possible logistically but physically? I’m in my 40s now and I’d say when I was 20, sure I could do it physically (have that much sex)

Dude was living a lavish lifestyle. I assume he was buying a lot of starving girls meals then banging them and that is why he was spending so much money? He didn’t elaborate on where the money went in the article.

Definitely possible logistically but physically? I doubt the notch count was that high.

I don’t see getting up to 600 girls pregnant as something positive. He isn’t going to be helping to raise them, just having a one night stands using no condoms .

He flat out says he was tricking the girls, I doubt it, they likely knew the score and saw he was a wealthy Frenchman and went along with all of it willingly with little to no trickery
 

infowarrior1

Hummingbird
@El Chinito loco

Its too bad I cannot live centuries or Millennia in my current body. But I would like to see what impact Christianity would have on those places.

The genuine article will promote healthy intact families and many pro-civilization behaviors. Over generations perhaps they will uplift the 3rd world just like Europe was uplifted.
 
El Chinito loco said:
Do you know what you get when you mix a white Frenchman with blacks?

Haiti.

There's nothing good about this sort of degeneracy. No, Africa won't be improved if you ship in lots of non black dudes with hard dicks who go to town on the women there and produce lots of bastard children.

All you're doing is seeding the country with more despair and on top of that those mulatto kids will just get ruthlessly exploited by the natives with sexual abuse and other ways. I'm a father and the idea of any of my progeny being subjected to this sort of abuse is horrific to me. If you think having lots of kids without being around as a father is "based" then you are a degenerate. Full stop.

Africa as a continent is a wasteland in many ways. It reflects the beginning of humanity and the end of humanity. It's a cesspool of wasted potential and human detritus.

The best thing to do is to just cease all aid and any pretense of supporting any of the corrupt leaders there. Just let them handle their own problems for a few centuries and maybe whatever comes out of the ashes will be better than what it is now. There will be lots of death and destruction for sure but at least through the fire they might be able to forge something new and civilized.

Even if it's not better it can't be much worse. Africa as a continent is just a breeding pool for despair and exotic diseases which gets exported elsewhere in the form of refugees and viral transmission from animals and humans alike.

Barring some apocalyptic event like a giant meteor hitting Africa right square in the center it will not change anytime soon.

Haiti was some 0,1% White at the time of the rebellion. The few surviving women would hardly put a dent - even though the lighter skinned Haitians ruled to this day being the mixed progeny of the former Frenchmen.

As for eugenics - you don't even have to go into race. 1 mio. 120+ IQ black men will do the job too - if they impregnate 200 mio. women, then this would have a massive influence even if that model is hardly optimal vs single stable families. But many countries don't even have that in Africa, so in reality it would be an upgrade to the status quo.

Now no one should be advocating for any such thing. Positive eugenics can be done with much more benign tools, but so far no country and certainly not the globalist elite is interested in that. I listened once to the Red Pill guy Renegade of Funk - a black guy with a tested IQ of 160 - he himself said that such a positive intelligence centered eugenic model would be beneficial - to any country, but obviously more to Africa. Though obviously the elite isn't interested in a smart efficient and potentially rebellious African population, so you are not going to get that.

As for the likelihood of that guy. I knew rich men who even took hormones in order to have more sex during the day. The number is possible in Africa if you spend a lot of cash, have some modicum of Game and throw the cash around on top of that. As for the impregnation level - if he did 10% of what he claims then it's still some result.

If the story is real, then it's at best some bizarre oddity and nothing more. He could have done it also in SEA, though that might have cost him there as they would be able sometimes to ferret out the papas.

Oh - and that model is being done by black Alphas all across the West - 90% of Western women are single mothers afterwards. Even a buddy of mine has one of those dads who fucked off to the Caribbean on a Swedish pension (he faked a mental illness and got a pension in his 40s) as soon as having sired two sons.
 

JiggyLordJr

Kingfisher
Wow, this guy clearly must have not cared much for quality. I'm sure that through his abundance mentality he was able to snag a few 7s plus, but overall he must have been fucking some serious warthog stank puss. Can't imagine being in his shoes and doing this - that money could have been put to way better use elsewhere. I suppose some guys are so thirsty they they would literally fuck anything. Weird that.
 

AntoniusofEfa

Woodpecker
As of 2019, the average young African women in Germany (quite a few of them in big cities) is fitter and dressed in a more feminine style than the typical same aged German women. This is my observation from my daily commute.
 

Handsome Creepy Eel

Owl
Gold Member
What are the odds the next time he lands in Nigeria there's a couple of enterprising gangsta types waiting for him at the airport ready to drug him and force him to hand over the remaining €350,000.00?
 
Personally I wouldnt want my offspring to be raised in a third world facing all sorts of horror.
We shouldn't just bang and make babies carelessly with irresponsible women
Come on guys ,that's animal behaviour.
 

kosko

Peacock
Gold Member
Samseau said:
African women are less concerned with pregnancy than nearly any other type of woman on the planet. Single-motherhood is the norm in Africa, and I guess these women figure, "Hey, if I'm gonna be pregnant and raise a child by myself with my mothers, aunts, and sisters, it may as well be an exotic child!" Naturally being White or Asian = unlimited women in Africa.

This guy sounds quite stupid though; wasting money always makes me disgusted.

It is frowned upon culturally to be a deadbeat father in many parts of Africa. If you get a girl pregnant and she is young her parents will demand you marry her.

In some parts of Africa though there is more "Liberal" views to this. In francophone Africa culturally it is not viewed negatively to have many baby mothers.

Only if the father is evil (causing the girl to leave) or runs off can get him our of the responsibility of rasing the child.
 

El Chinito loco

Crow
Gold Member
kosko said:
Samseau said:
African women are less concerned with pregnancy than nearly any other type of woman on the planet. Single-motherhood is the norm in Africa, and I guess these women figure, "Hey, if I'm gonna be pregnant and raise a child by myself with my mothers, aunts, and sisters, it may as well be an exotic child!" Naturally being White or Asian = unlimited women in Africa.

This guy sounds quite stupid though; wasting money always makes me disgusted.

It is frowned upon culturally to be a deadbeat father in many parts of Africa. If you get a girl pregnant and she is young her parents will demand you marry her.

Frowned upon so much that it is in fact the norm in most of North America and Europe with Africans or even slightly melanin enhanced right? :razz:
 

Samseau

Owl
Gold Member
Yeah, from what I've seen, Christian Black cultures where marriage is far more common, such as Jamaica or Oromo Ethiopians, are not the norm in the Black universe. The huge numbers of Blacks migrating into Europe I figure are all raised by single mothers. They had no father and therefore no opportunity where they grew up, so they left for greener pastures.
 
I don't see how it's statistically possible to have unprotected sex with that many women and not get an STD, especially in one of the most STD-heavy parts of the planet. So yeah I'm calling foul on this story.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
Samseau said:
Yeah, from what I've seen, Christian Black cultures where marriage is far more common, such as Jamaica or Oromo Ethiopians, are not the norm in the Black universe. The huge numbers of Blacks migrating into Europe I figure are all raised by single mothers. They had no father and therefore no opportunity where they grew up, so they left for greener pastures.

Jamaica has the world's highest rate of out of wedlock births, at 86%. That's pretty much the norm across Back Caribbean islands. A young guy from Trinidad I've recently met has a grandmother who had 13 kids from 11 different fathers...

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/columns/Marriage-matters_52111

Countries in which slavery existed have the highest rate of children being born out of wedlock. In Jamaica, more children are born out of wedlock than anywhere else in the world. Fourteen per cent are born to parents who are married to each other, while 86 per cent are not.

This is according to renowned family psychologist and chief executive officer of Family Life Ministries, Dr Barry Davidson, who says the only places that can be compared to Jamaica are places like Barbados, Antigua, St Kitts and other countries with a similar background. Dr Davidson says if you also look at black Americans you will find that they too have a very high rate of children being born out of wedlock when compared with Hispanics or white Americans.

This is because slaves were never socialised to be good fathers and mothers, wives and husbands. Slavery was not about people getting married. Rather, it was about a man impregnating a woman with male slaves socialised to be studs. The aim was to produce as many slaves as possible, just as a farmer hopes to have as many head of cattle as possible.

During slavery, the only person who had the opportunity to practise any kind of parenting was the female.

Interestingly, despite their slavery experience, Trinidad and Guyana have a very low rate of children born outside of marriage, due to the large number of East Indians who later came as indentured servants.


That out of wedlock rate is probably lower among Caribbean immigrants in N. America, it would be interesting to compare it to the rest of the Black population here. The article above is wrong about historic out of wedlock rates in Black America, they used to be very low as late as the 1950s, when their societies were deeply Christian.

That is also the case for Ethiopians, who have more traditional family values and over a millennium of home grown Orthodox Christian culture, unlike in West Africa where Christianity is a relatively recent imported religion. It's also true in Black African Muslim countries, which have more traditional family values and also have much lower AIDS rates than their southern sub-Saharian animist/recently Christian neighbors.
 

Captainstabbin

Hummingbird
Roosh said:
He said he slept with 1400 women and impregnated 600 of them. That is a 43% impregnation rate, suggesting he has super sperm. He has not provided evidence of even one pregnancy that is confirmed to be his doing, but why would he lie?

“I began having sex with girls every day. Sometimes, I would sleep with three girls at the same time. It was a marvelous experience.


“Since I returned to France, I have had more than 600 of them who told me they got pregnant for me. Some committed abortion, and I do not know exactly how many finally gave birth.




eradicator said:
“It’s physically impossible to bang 1400 girls in 2 years”

Ok first off, some of them are going to be pigs. I didn’t read that as having sex with 1400 pretty women. It’s 1400 women.

Could it be done physically? Maybe. Is this dude under the age of 25? Or in his 30s/40s but on trt?

It's possible. He says he was banging several women at a time. But that would mean the pregnancy rate, crazy high even if it's one girl at a time, should be much lower.

The part I find disturbing is that he gave these women his real contact information. So, inevitably they contacted him trying to shake him down.

"Since I returned to France, I have had more than 600 of them who told me they got pregnant for me."

If he's telling the truth, the 600 women contacting him were pregnant from someone else and looking for a payday...if they were pregnant at all.
 
< Black America up to the 1950s was more stable even than White America with marriage rates of over 90%, but it wasn't due to Christianity. It was due to the strict control imposed by White society - they pulled together, stayed married for simple survival and worked hard adhering to the laws better than White folks did because the punishments would also be more extreme. All of that became unravelled as they were given the freedom to do as they pleased. Sure - it was also partly elite-guided as the welfare model and the initial search-parties to not have a man in the household was designed to rip apart families, but all ethnicities are touched by that.

As Jared Taylor put it - black Americans were essentially forced to accept the White man model - civil rights brought them closer to more natural behavior patterns. Chrsitianity helps, but is no all-cure-tool.

Christianity is Africa's biggest religion at least in Central Africa, but it did not produce the same results as in Europe just as South America being deeply Christian does not stem the violence or generate a more efficient system. Meanwhile the virtually non-believing Japanese or Chinese have no issue with creating prosperous, stable and safe societies.

[img=400x600]http://i.imgur.com/tr4jweq.png[/img]
 
Top