No, but similar to that I could see psych evals being required for gun purchases.
Future Progressivism
- Thread starter TCOCBR18
- Start date
The future of progressivism? Well, its not what you think. Conditions are misleading right now because progressivism is in power. However, things will change, because things always change. But with progressivism...honestly, in its current incarnation i.e. extremely radicalized, woke, and intersectional, this is doomed. Bold statement; I know. However, its literally denying reality itself. That plus, it created the conditions for systematic pedophilia and sexualizing and mutilating children. For this reason, it is untenable as an ideology and totally and completely evil.
Progressivism has "pivoted" and changed before. It was once a party for the working class. It will change again. Some of its underlying tenets such as relying on centralized state control will remain vs. dispersed and checked small government. Progressivism's last pivot was at the behest of the "Frankfurt school" and all of the well-known villains within.
That's the point - the entire "Frankfurt school" contingent is nothing more than a bunch of pederasts and pedophiles. And this is being revealed as we speak. They will go down in history as nothing less than extreme degenerates that sought to abuse children.
The signals are growing by the day. I'm no fan of the Kennedy's but RFK has a lot of momentum mostly because he's anti-woke and against the deep state (because it killed his brother). Corruption notwithstanding, his popularity and potential in the primaries show you that even among the democrat rank and file, the woke incarnation of progressivism is, in fact, not all that popular.
That said, what's stopping these radicals to do to RFK what they did to bernie sanders? A likely outcome, but, to see the momentum, from the democrat side no less, is reassuring.
Because at the end of all this is pedophilia and the current manifestation of progressivism has its hands all over this. pedophilia will not be "normalized" it will be the undoing of this horrible cult.
progressivism will undoubtedly resurface as it always does but in a different form exploiting different people. Probably the immigrant class.
Progressivism has "pivoted" and changed before. It was once a party for the working class. It will change again. Some of its underlying tenets such as relying on centralized state control will remain vs. dispersed and checked small government. Progressivism's last pivot was at the behest of the "Frankfurt school" and all of the well-known villains within.
That's the point - the entire "Frankfurt school" contingent is nothing more than a bunch of pederasts and pedophiles. And this is being revealed as we speak. They will go down in history as nothing less than extreme degenerates that sought to abuse children.
The signals are growing by the day. I'm no fan of the Kennedy's but RFK has a lot of momentum mostly because he's anti-woke and against the deep state (because it killed his brother). Corruption notwithstanding, his popularity and potential in the primaries show you that even among the democrat rank and file, the woke incarnation of progressivism is, in fact, not all that popular.
That said, what's stopping these radicals to do to RFK what they did to bernie sanders? A likely outcome, but, to see the momentum, from the democrat side no less, is reassuring.
Because at the end of all this is pedophilia and the current manifestation of progressivism has its hands all over this. pedophilia will not be "normalized" it will be the undoing of this horrible cult.
progressivism will undoubtedly resurface as it always does but in a different form exploiting different people. Probably the immigrant class.
I think you're underestimating the power of status quo when also combined with money that hasn't run out yet. I don't think we have any capacity to suggest RFK has anywhere near this kind of appeal or ultimate power to change anyone in that demonic side/cesspool, but I do share your hope in a sense.
This I agree with. It is a confusing thing, and one that the forum hinges on all the time, why God allows these macro things to persist for so long. One of the proper responses to this is likely, "actually Blade Runner, it's not that long, to be honest." You just look at your life in a different way. Yes, it's likely my own desires. Some of which are corrupted, indeed, but some of which aren't, which cause more of the suffering of this nonsense. But I know the lesson, nevertheless.
In which regards precisely?
Not as such, however I can see the trend to pathologise every little mood/ behavioural quirk accelerating - big bucks to be made. The trend is desirable to them as people on meds are blunted, less feeling and ultimately less questioning.
People seemingly can't handle the normal range of human emotions properly - no one is happy and contented all of the time or calm nor should they be as that is unnatural. Meds are a salve, which stop people dwelling on the often painful and disturbed reality they live in.
I have heard progressives talk about right-wing thought as a mental illness requiring institutionalization. And one went as far as to propose mandatory psychological treatment for it.
This is extremely fringe, but I'm just be wondering if this could gain traction in the future; they could trot out some experts to agree with it and start getting recommendations to view right-wing sentiments classified as mental disorder pushed through medical institutions.
Easy_C
Peacock
It's all laid out in the writings of the early technocrats such as (most famously) brave new world. If left unchecked, the goal is to "hive" humanity: to turn everyone into a sterile slave species that is genetically engineered to perform the tasks assigned to them. That's part of why the beehive is a prominent symbol in various talmudic-associated secret societies.
Yes. Test tube babies which have been introduced in the last decades are a very by design thing which indeed you can read in brave new world from the 30s. Eventually their plan is to have no natural born babies. Full control so the system can quantify the amount of children being born. And we're on that path with the anti children rhetoric we see. Couple of decades and this idea will be introduced slowly but surely to the masses: good for climate change, good for your individualistic lifestyle, good for the world, good for yourself.
We have been seeing decreasing birth rates for years now, but recently it seems to be getting worse much faster than before. And the majority rhetoric does certainly now seem to be against large families; they are getting stigmatized at worst, and at best looked on like you must be insane to want that. And the most remarkable thing of all is that the rapidly decreasing birth rates are no longer just in the Western world; it is taking root all over the world. That's the biggest change in this decade, before it was just the West but now all over. With a renewed propaganda push to talk about childbirth as the "most environmentally unfriendly thing you could possibly do", and of course with increased propaganda targeting the career setbacks for women with children, I am quite confident that we will at least see further disappearance of large families from our culture, and I might even go as far as to suggest that they will be proposing legal limits on the number of children people can have.
Here's another prediction: They are going to be pushing really hard to transition to a national popular vote for the presidency and either abolish the electoral college or effectively neutralize. We already know they are against the electoral college, but I can easily see that ramping up significantly.