Gatekeepers - who they are and what their role is
- Thread starter PixelFree
- Start date
1) Milo Yiannopolis
Came out and admitted he's actively working with the feds to bust up right wing groups and from what I've heard helping them with the whole Charlottesville fiasco.
2) Alex Jones, talking about the CHICOMMS constantly.
Yeah China is a threat, but i don't believe their financial backing is pushing these BLM/antifa (((bolshevik))) losers.
Came out and admitted he's actively working with the feds to bust up right wing groups and from what I've heard helping them with the whole Charlottesville fiasco.
2) Alex Jones, talking about the CHICOMMS constantly.
Yeah China is a threat, but i don't believe their financial backing is pushing these BLM/antifa (((bolshevik))) losers.
1. The entire HR department at any large corporation
2. Purpose - to hire visible minorities and socialists
3. What they don't seem to talk about - IQ, agreeableness, productivity, profit and social cohesion
The thing is, the HR department isn't a conscious gatekeeper and neither were the people that put them there in the first place. The HR department was put there originally to comply with new laws and deal with unions. At the time when it was new, many of the higher ups didn't really know what to do with it, so they originally just hired hot white women and diversity quotas into the positions because they couldn't actually hurt the company in the beginning. However, as laws grew stronger, HR grew like a cancer inside these corporations until it now defacto runs them.
2. Purpose - to hire visible minorities and socialists
3. What they don't seem to talk about - IQ, agreeableness, productivity, profit and social cohesion
The thing is, the HR department isn't a conscious gatekeeper and neither were the people that put them there in the first place. The HR department was put there originally to comply with new laws and deal with unions. At the time when it was new, many of the higher ups didn't really know what to do with it, so they originally just hired hot white women and diversity quotas into the positions because they couldn't actually hurt the company in the beginning. However, as laws grew stronger, HR grew like a cancer inside these corporations until it now defacto runs them.
- Universities
- Credentialing cartel
- How the banks empowered them to control the employment landscape
I don't think there are many gatekeepers.
People have disagreements on the forum. They don't typically seem to think the person they disagree with is a disinfo agent.
Yet if they can get 10-20K Youtube views per video they might be thought of as a gatekeeper/disinfo agent.
The most likely reason why someone doesn't talk about the Jews, for example, is out of fear or thinking it's crazy talk. Other than blacks, there are probably not many people who believe in JQ. So it's no surprise few people promote it.
I was thinking about this in relation to what @Dr. Howard mentions. There are a lot of people who think major corporations are part of the far-left. A more likely situation is they are primarily paralysed by fear of HR and SJW mobs. Imagine you are on $5 million a year and angry Shaniqua and DeShawn from HR are up telling you you need to do a campaign on how fat, black trans people are being killed. For the average person the security of the $5 million is a huge weight on not doing nothing. Leftists have created that corporate Achilles' heel. To a considerable extent corporates have fluffed diversity by stuffing their internships full of muh victims. That was the Trojan horse.
But with that said, if there were people that were specific gatekeepers my best bets would be Laruen Southern and Glen Beck. And Charlie Kirk and Ben Shapiro, but their nature is slightly different.
It's not difficult to go out and find people who believe what Don Lemon or Charles Krauthammer think. It's more difficult to find JQ people.
People have disagreements on the forum. They don't typically seem to think the person they disagree with is a disinfo agent.
Yet if they can get 10-20K Youtube views per video they might be thought of as a gatekeeper/disinfo agent.
The most likely reason why someone doesn't talk about the Jews, for example, is out of fear or thinking it's crazy talk. Other than blacks, there are probably not many people who believe in JQ. So it's no surprise few people promote it.
I was thinking about this in relation to what @Dr. Howard mentions. There are a lot of people who think major corporations are part of the far-left. A more likely situation is they are primarily paralysed by fear of HR and SJW mobs. Imagine you are on $5 million a year and angry Shaniqua and DeShawn from HR are up telling you you need to do a campaign on how fat, black trans people are being killed. For the average person the security of the $5 million is a huge weight on not doing nothing. Leftists have created that corporate Achilles' heel. To a considerable extent corporates have fluffed diversity by stuffing their internships full of muh victims. That was the Trojan horse.
But with that said, if there were people that were specific gatekeepers my best bets would be Laruen Southern and Glen Beck. And Charlie Kirk and Ben Shapiro, but their nature is slightly different.
It's not difficult to go out and find people who believe what Don Lemon or Charles Krauthammer think. It's more difficult to find JQ people.
I too was unsure exactly if they existed.
People just avoiding certain topics because that's the wise thing to do OR they had no interest/expertise in them.
That was, until I saw a speech by some British MP (Brian someone from Britain First, I believe?). He basically came right out, said he was approached and offered funding, to whip everyone up all about Islam, but not mention the financal system. He was somehow associated with Tommy Robinson. This MP guy was then de-personed into oblivion and Tommy Robinson rose to fame again. Makes you wonder if one took the deal and the other didn't.
People just avoiding certain topics because that's the wise thing to do OR they had no interest/expertise in them.
That was, until I saw a speech by some British MP (Brian someone from Britain First, I believe?). He basically came right out, said he was approached and offered funding, to whip everyone up all about Islam, but not mention the financal system. He was somehow associated with Tommy Robinson. This MP guy was then de-personed into oblivion and Tommy Robinson rose to fame again. Makes you wonder if one took the deal and the other didn't.
Well said, and insanely true for government. Imagine you are 20 years into your career and 5 away from retirement (most higher ups). If you get terminated, you lose that entire 20 years of employer contributions to your pension and just get your contributions back.
This was my experience when I worked for state government. I had a whopping 5 years of pension when I would sit at meetings with the 'senior leadership team'. The discussions were essentially a dance of identifying who would sue the agency, and who would get pissed off (including unions) if they did anything.
It usually took 2-3 days to identify all the things they couldn't do without pissing anyone off an risking their jobs, and by that point they were all exhausted and out of time and so did nothing.
At the time, I couldn't understand why they were so afraid of everything and so afraid to act. I had most of my working life and earning years ahead of me and nothing to lose, they were all looking at retirement and had all of their pensions on the line.
I think you mean Paul Golding, who has never been an MP. I think he is most noted for putting out a video of him and his people marching through the streets of Luton (terrorist hotbed and Tommy's hometown) with Muslims coming up to him saying things like, "Muslims will take over, you watch." It got something like 23M views in 1-2 days on FB alone.
Tommy also said he had this same offer from military intelligence guys. He says it somewhere in this video:
https://altcensored.com/watch?v=Xevva59cBtM
That when he was having his various legal troubles he was offered a role to 'unite the right. But he didn't go into it much and I don't know exactly what that means. But I would guess they wanted to set him up.
Again, I think TR is likely some guy who doesn't agree with XYZ.
(1) Name: Jordan B Peterson
(2) Purpose: Acknowledge Marxism, Cultural Rot, Leftism, Western History , Spirituality, provide white men with coping mechanisms/ cultural context
(3) What they dont talk about: Jews, True Christianity, Immigration, Daughters Instagram account
(2) Purpose: Acknowledge Marxism, Cultural Rot, Leftism, Western History , Spirituality, provide white men with coping mechanisms/ cultural context
(3) What they dont talk about: Jews, True Christianity, Immigration, Daughters Instagram account
Ironside
Robin
Nick Griffin
Nick Griffin on the Kalergi plan
When the godfather of the European Union, Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, published the plan for a united Europe and the ethnocide of the peoples of Europe, the encouragement of mass non-white immigration was central to the plot. Since then, an unholy alliance of leftists, capitalists and Zionist...
Last edited:
That's the guy.
A gatekeeper is someone who punches weakly to his left and hard to his right. A refusal to tackle tough subjects doesn't necessarily make you a gatekeeper. Some people just want to have their focus on certain issues and don't want to steer into rougher waters -- Colin Flaherty focuses on 'the hoax of black victimization,' Jones on anti-globalism, Dice makes fun of the left, etc. Gatekeepers are those who push hard to cancel people to the right and steer nationalists and conservative concerns down safe channels. They are often grifters in the employ of big money globalist sponsors pushing open borders, degeneracy, big tech, or Jewish interests.
Below is a good recent example of a gatekeeping column.
www.denverpost.com
Examples of gatekeepers are Ben Shapiro, Charlie Kirk, and National Review. There are countless hacks in and associated with the Republican party as well (e.g. Rove). TPUSA tries to blunt real movements by co-opting their language, by ineffective, fake-tough rhetoric that accomplishes nothing but fundraising, and by steering things into safer waters (e.g. instead of banning immigration, let's encourage legal immigration and staple green cards to diplomas). The Groypers amusingly exposed this last year.
If someone asks you if you will disavow Mr. ABC who supports white nationalism or whatever other bogeyman they come up with, the way a non-gatekeeper would answer this is to say that Mr. ABC isn't try to destroy Christianity and freedom of speech. Soros, big tech, the MSM, the ADL, the SPLC, and the left are. Mr. ABC isn't working to destroy my country through mass immigration, but the Chamber, Soros, the left, and most Republican and Democrat officials sure are!
Below is a good recent example of a gatekeeping column.
Guest commentary: Conservatives have moral duty to disown Michelle Malkin, Alt-Right
The rally was, however, a painful reminder that Malkin remains a part of the conservative movement in Colorado. It is morally unconscionable that she has a platform within conservative circles, inc…
www.denverpost.com
Examples of gatekeepers are Ben Shapiro, Charlie Kirk, and National Review. There are countless hacks in and associated with the Republican party as well (e.g. Rove). TPUSA tries to blunt real movements by co-opting their language, by ineffective, fake-tough rhetoric that accomplishes nothing but fundraising, and by steering things into safer waters (e.g. instead of banning immigration, let's encourage legal immigration and staple green cards to diplomas). The Groypers amusingly exposed this last year.
If someone asks you if you will disavow Mr. ABC who supports white nationalism or whatever other bogeyman they come up with, the way a non-gatekeeper would answer this is to say that Mr. ABC isn't try to destroy Christianity and freedom of speech. Soros, big tech, the MSM, the ADL, the SPLC, and the left are. Mr. ABC isn't working to destroy my country through mass immigration, but the Chamber, Soros, the left, and most Republican and Democrat officials sure are!
Last edited:
Even though he’s no longer alive…
Person: Joseph Campbell
Purpose: To conflate mythology with egalitarianism: i.e. all cultures and heroes are essentially the same.
What he didn't seem to talk about: the JQ, race and/or gender differences, and what made some civilizations superior (and/or inferior) to others.
In short, Campbell’s work seems to be an attempt to “correct” the mythological viewpoints of people like Alfred Rosenberg (NSDAP philosopher who believed that mythologies were a driving force behind why some cultures rose, while others failed).
Person: Joseph Campbell
Purpose: To conflate mythology with egalitarianism: i.e. all cultures and heroes are essentially the same.
What he didn't seem to talk about: the JQ, race and/or gender differences, and what made some civilizations superior (and/or inferior) to others.
In short, Campbell’s work seems to be an attempt to “correct” the mythological viewpoints of people like Alfred Rosenberg (NSDAP philosopher who believed that mythologies were a driving force behind why some cultures rose, while others failed).