Perhaps why the whole sorry drama has taken so long.How likely is it that Barry gets an impartial judge/jury, if this even goes to trial?
He would be entitled to a jury of his peers, some will just vote not guilty just because "orange man bad"
It wasn't just that he wasn't a deep state swamp creature, or that he wanted radical changes over at DIA, or that he (very likely) had or could get evidence of all sorts of political malfeasance within the intelligence community, as you describe. He also served under General McChrystal, who was effectively fired by Obama (resigned), and was at odds with then-Director of National Intelligence, James "least most untruthful response" Clapper. Once he was fired from DIA, everyone thought that was the end of him.My understanding is that as head of DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) under Obama from 2012-2014, he had dirt on the IC's/Obama admin actions with regards to spying on political opposition and other illegal activities. Once Trump won and he became National Security Advisor, he became an immediate threat to everyone connected to all the dirty work done under Obama.
It's kind of like divorce in modern America. Doesn't matter if you're innocent; once your wife/ex-wife claims you slapped the hell out of her and sexually molested the kids to gain the upper hand in the courts, your credibility is severely damage and it can take years to un-screw; assuming you even have the money/resources to fight off the bogus claim.
Before Flynn could make his move, they took him out of play and in addition, put the Trump administration on defense within the first month of the Trump's term.
Just like false allegations in a divorce rape case, sometimes the good guy wins in the end after a very painful battle. Hopefully, this is the case with regards to all the Spygate/Flynn/Russiagate/Fake Impeachment stuff and the day of reckoning is coming very soon.
Certain people need to get life in prison and perhaps even the death penalty for what has occurred with regards to the all the aforementioned. If we don't see the counter-punch soon from either Trump and/or Durham, this country is finished.
A U.S. judge put on hold the Justice Department’s move to drop charges against Michael Flynn, saying he expects independent groups and legal experts to argue against the bid to exonerate President Trump’s former national security adviser of lying to the FBI.
U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan said in an order Tuesday that he expects individuals and organizations will seek to intervene in the politically charged case. Having others weigh in could preface more aggressive steps that the federal judge in Washington could take, including — as many outside observers have called for — holding a hearing to consider what to do.
Sullivan’s order came after the government took the highly irregular step Thursday of reversing its stance on upholding Flynn’s guilty plea.
The article did mention “individuals and organizations.” Hmm.I read this as him wanting some Jews to get in some last hits before finally dismissing the case.
After AG Barr directed prosecutors to drop the case against the former Trump aide who admits lying to the FBI, the judge invited briefs from third parties.www.aol.com
Does anybody know what the justification is for granting access of this resource to Ambassadors, Deputy Chiefs of Mission, and Deputy Secretaries of Treasury and Energy? I remember being baffled that Susan Power even had the ability to use this when she claimed others did in her name. It seems like the kind of thing only The President, NSA, Need To Know Intelligence Officials, and Need to Know Defense officials should have.
Oohhhhh look-y here..."Vice President of the United States - Joesph R. Biden".
Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton is trying to deflect everyone's attention to something else. She's clearly nervous about the unmasking list.