Georgia Colour Revolution
- Thread starter paternos
- Start date
Georgians chose freely to align with the gay disco so this is happening by their own commission. They may have thought they can make only half a deal with satan and be just partially gay but no, no, no, now globo-homo wants to clear up shop completely, perhaps to open another front with Russia. EU flags in Georgia are so goofy and stupid it just reaffirms it's an entity with ulterior motives. One look at a map says all, where is EU and where is Georgia. Ridiculous.
It's a real pity that Russians and Georgians can't get along, instead Orthodox Georgia is siding with ZOG against Orthodox Russia. It's a sad and disappointing lack of charity that won't go unnoticed by God.
It's a real pity that Russians and Georgians can't get along, instead Orthodox Georgia is siding with ZOG against Orthodox Russia. It's a sad and disappointing lack of charity that won't go unnoticed by God.
Last edited:
KEK, I thought this would be something related to the American Georgia, and colour as in the leftist definition of "people of colour".
Georgia: Whose Country Is It Anyway?
Parliamentary majority wants closer regulation of foreign-funded NGOs. Washington and Brussels object. A second Color Revolution in the offing?
In the country of Georgia, Parliament is considering a bill that would require NGOs that get over 20 percent of their funding from abroad to register as foreign agents. The bill passed today, over a threatened presidential veto. There were protests on the streets. And lo, a top Color Revolutionary herself weighed in last week:
If you follow the link to the news story, you’ll see that the Georgian president opposes the bill because it would hurt European integration. But what business is it of Europe or the US as to whether or not Georgia wants to regulate the activities of foreign-funded NGOs in its own sovereign territory? This bill might not be wise — I don’t know enough about the details to say — but it’s not at all surprising that countries see how Washington and Brussels use soft power through NGOs to manipulate the political processes in those countries, and want to protect themselves from it. I wrote at TAC the other day about how the aptly named Power showed up in Budapest last month to announce a $20 million commitment to fund initiatives in Hungary clearly aimed at undermining the democratically elected government of Viktor Orban.
From another story:
The US Embassy in Georgia called the legislation "Kremlin-inspired" and said it was incompatible with the country's desire to join the European Union. "Today is a dark day for Georgia's democracy," the embassy said in a statement, adding that the legislation raised questions about "the ruling party's commitment to Euro-Atlantic integration".
US State Department spokesman Ned Price said the draft legislation would be a tremendous setback and "would strike at some of the very rights that are central to the aspirations of the people of Georgia", BBC reported.
European Union foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said the draft law was a "very bad development" for the country and could seriously affect its ties with the EU.
Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have said the legislation would impede rights to freedom of expression and association in the country with onerous financial reporting requirements.
“The 'foreign agent' bills seek to marginalize and discredit independent, foreign-funded groups and media that serve the wider public interest in Georgia," said Hugh Williamson, Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch.
Who defines “the wider public interest in Georgia”? The bill is backed by the majority party in the Georgian parliament, which has enough support to override a presidential veto. Who is more representative of the “wider public interest” there: lawmakers democratically elected by the public, or foreign governments and NGOs? These people think they have the right to go into a country and work to undermine its democratically elected governments, its laws, and its cultural traditions -- and anybody who tries to stop it is a stooge of Putin. Are we looking at the beginning of a Second Rose Revolution?
Here is a map of the region. Notice where Georgia is — on the far right, below Russia:
Georgia wants to join the EU and NATO. The new proposed law would make that more difficult, it is claimed by the US and EU, who want Georgia to join the EU and NATO. I have no strong opinion about Georgia and the EU, except to warn the devoutly Orthodox Christian nation -- one that I am very eager to visit as a religious pilgrim -- that Brussels will try to eradicate laws and policies based on Christian faith convictions. (Ask Hungarians and Poles about LGBT and family matters.)
As for NATO, one certainly sympathizes with Georgia’s fear of Russian imperialist power, but how can it possibly be a vital national security interest of the United States to be committed to fighting World War III on behalf of a Caucasus nation whose capital, Tbilisi, is slightly farther east than — wait for it — Baghdad?
Georgia: Whose Country Is It Anyway? - The American Conservative
Parliamentary majority wants closer regulation of foreign-funded NGOs. Washington and Brussels object. A second Color Revolution in the offing?
www.theamericanconservative.com
"A top Color Revolutionary", speaking of Samantha Powers.Georgia: Whose Country Is It Anyway?
Georgia: Whose Country Is It Anyway? - The American Conservative
Parliamentary majority wants closer regulation of foreign-funded NGOs. Washington and Brussels object. A second Color Revolution in the offing?
This just goes to show, as I'm sure was intended, that all these so-called "Color Revolutions" are really attempted CIA coups. The CIA tried it in Kazakhstan last January just before the Russian SMO started in Ukraine. This is just another front in WWIII between the US/EU/NATO and BRICS+.
Hopefully Georgia can put it down as firmly as Kazakhstan did. It's amazing that there are so many people in Georgia and all these other countries that come out for these protests at the CIA's beckon call.
It's not amazing, it's predictable - there will never be a shortage of stupid people.
The funds are crazy.
The EU is literally spending billions on neighbourhood englargement.
Georgia
Based on the Commission’s opinion on the country’s application for EU membership, Georgia was given a European perspective on 23 June 2022 by unanimous agreement between the leaders of all 27 EU Member States...
Hundreds of millions for Georgia alone:
Home - EU for Georgia
EU is the largest development partner of Georgia Find out about EU assistance on this website EU stories near you: FEATURESTORIES see all OUR FOCUS PARTNERSHIP THAT CREATES PARTNERSHIP THAT PROTECTS PARTNERSHIP THAT GREENS PARTNERSHIP THAT CONNECTS PARTNERSHIP THAT EMPOWERS NEWS see all...
eu4georgia.eu
E.g. Support to Gender Equality and Women Political Participation in Georgia
EU Project page - EU for Georgia
eu4georgia.eu
And this is just direct EU money, we are not speaking yet on individual member states and the whole network of NGOs,
For many people this is their very well paid salary. Under the disguise of NGOs and these "helping" projects the empire has thousands of people on their pay roll in Georgia that are trained in political activism. As they have in Ukraine, Kazakhstan.
Pay attention to Hungary too due to Samantha Power's presence in that country.
I can't believe Samantha Powers uses that fright mask picture on her twitter profile, but I suppose she probably likes that look.
Right after the fall of the Soviet Union, the Georgian Ossetian War and the Georgian Abkhazian War broke out. These regions wanted to align with Russia but Georgians saw the land as theirs. Nasty fighting including ethnic cleansing occurred on both sides. Peace was brokered and Russia was sent into the regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia as peacekeepers. I'm an American and this isn't taught over in the west. I only found out about how gruesome the wars were while I was killing time looking up the 2008 Russo-Georgian war.
The 2008 war is similar to the Ukraine situation. Georgia was getting teased by the west with promises of receiving NATO and EU status so they would align with the west against Russia. They received military training and economic asistance from the west. The leader, Mikheil Saakashvili, believe NATO would support him if he made a move reclaiming the region of South Ossetia, which became an autonomous region protected by Russian troops after the Georgian Ossetian War. He was wrong.
'You can always hire one half of the poor to kill the other half.'
Not really
Most Russians couldnt care less about S Osettia & Abkhazia. The only reason why Russian goverment intervened in 2008 is because it fits their interest in the Caucasus. Whereas in Ukraine most Russians see it as an exisitential conflict.
In fact last year the Russian government told the S Ossetian leader to Not hold an independence referendum.
The Abkhazian war was a very strange & sad one. In fact eveb the notorious Chechen terrorist Shamil Basayev fought on the side of the Abkhazians. A mere 3 years later he would be taking over whole hospital buildings with those inside held hostage within Russia itself.
Last edited: